<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jackbecommspeednet's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Continue after New Physical Constancy's JLD Edit WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:55:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Jackbecommspeednet&#039;s Weblog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Jack L. Doan&#8217;s Political (decision making process)</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/jack-l-doans-political-decision-making-process/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/jack-l-doans-political-decision-making-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Jack L. Doan Analogies on COREL WP8 rewrite of 11/18/2000   JLD Analogy of Political Science rewrite of 11/16/2000 WordPerfect 8 lost PAGE 1 My definition of politics is decision making process. On this particular date, 11/16/00, the science of politics is of paramount importance. The politics of the democrats is the same as it has [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=120&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span lang="EN-CA"> </span><strong>Jack L. Doan Analogies on COREL WP8 rewrite of 11/18/2000</strong><span lang="EN-CA"> </span></p>
<p> JLD Analogy of Political Science rewrite of 11/16/2000 WordPerfect 8 lost</p>
<p>PAGE 1</p>
<p>My definition of politics is decision making process. On this particular date, 11/16/00, the science of politics is of paramount importance. The politics of the democrats is the same as it has been for the last eight years under the Clinton administration. The politics of the Republicans is being even more politically influenced by corporate special interests. Science definition from Webster: Science 1 a: possession of knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding b: knowledge obtained through the study or practice 2 a: a department of systemized knowledge as an object of study (the ~ of theology) b: something (as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned by systematized knowledge c: one of the natural sciences 3. a: knowledge of converting general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific methods b: such knowledge concerned with the physical world based or purporting to be based on scientific principles 5. cap: CHRISTIAN SCIENCE</p>
<p>Page 2</p>
<p>Scientific Method from Webster: Scientific Method n: principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypothesis</p>
<p>Politics from Webster: Politics 1 a: the art or science of government b: the art of science concerned with the guiding or influencing government policy c: the art of science concerned with winning and holding control over a government 2: political actions, practices or policies 3: a: political affairs or businesses: specif power and leadership in a government or other group b: political like esp. as a principle activity or profession c: political activities characterized by artful and often dishonest practices 4: the political opinion or sympathies of a person 5: the total complex of relations between men in society</p>
<p>Now use the above definitions from Webster’s Dictionary in evaluating the opening paragraph (5 lines of JLD Analogy of Political Science. My definition decision making process covers all of Webster’s 1979 definitions and is much simpler so basically I will use my integrated definition in this evaluation: The Bush Campaign to gain this position, the President of the United States of America, today said through their lawyer in Tallahassee, Florida that the paying clients of lawyers in court should take precedent in the court’s decision over the pro bono clients in referring to the voters, Florida Citizens, that didn’t get their votes counted in the 2000 Presidential Election 2 because of bad balloting system per the citizens of Broward County in Florida. Could this be true of a lawyer representing George W. Bush’s Campaign? If these lawyers were receiving their retainers from the money put up by corporate’s with special interest’s this would obviously be true. In my dealings with a corporation it became obvious that to win an economic advantage in the courtroom they will do anything to embellish their great amount of wealth as stating their superior position relative to that of an individual. Could it be true Katherine Harris, Florida Secretary of State, who is responsible for seeing that individual citizens votes were counted was also acting as George W. Bush’s co-campaign chairman while trying to stop the manual voterecount on which a local Florida Circuit Judge made a ruling that she couldn’t stop without good reason? Could it be true that she continued to say stop this voting and then got Florida Supreme Court to get the voting stopped and had that petition denied because of support? The Supreme Court of Florida denied Katherine Harris’s third major attempt to stop the citizens from getting their vote at 4:00 p.m. Katherine Harris, in Sarasota, Florida, after divorcing her first husband and getting a substantial amount of alimony settlement even though she was a millionaire heiress went into local theatre and played Chicken Lady Dancers that lead to her entering politics per Inside Edition, Channel 3, Phoenix, Arizona at 4:05 p.m. Could it be she was only looking for lime-light to bask in? We will have to see what she does when the Florida Supreme Court doesn’t allow her to stop the recount of the Florida citizen’s vote manually so that they get their vote which is her State job was to insure. Every time, so far, she has done the opposite of what she was being paid for by the State by at least 3 times the amount of any other State Executive. Florida Supreme Court cleared the way for recount in Broward County that started at 4:00 p.m. Katherine Harris didn’t get her way. Palm Beach County started their recount at 3:00 p.m. 5:40 p.m. &#8211; why should there be more overseas voting ballots for 2000 Presidential election coming to Republican dominated populations than to Democratic counties dominate population? Could it be possible for special interest corporations to influence the military individuals to vote one way or another? I know from my experience when I was a company man in a corporation business I was influenced to vote Republican for 28 years and remained that part affiliation until I became distrustful about what was going on after Vice-President George Bush visited my business and its demise after that. Corporate contractors have ways of influencing the minds of military individuals. 10:00 p.m. &#8211; Secretary of State Katherine Harris still says she won’t accept or certify the manual recount numbers, which two Florida counties are proceeding with per Florida Supreme Court’s go-ahead. Now, at 10:00 p.m. the first political science study of my analogy is the meme myth that Katherine Harris is getting replicated for Bush’s political machinery in modifying meme democracy that the Republicans are replicating in order to politically in this dishonesty to the citizens of the United State of America in not letting them attempt to get their fair vote in the unmodified meme democracy that they had going into this 200 Presidential Election. The meme’s judicial system represents in this strange election where George W. Bush campaign thought they would get the popular vote which Al Gore got and would have to strategize for manipulating electoral votes. Now the Republican’s using the many meme’s justice system to just start their strategy in getting the election votes they desperately need to win the Presidential position paying off all their corporate backers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> Page 3</p>
<p>November 17, 2000</p>
<p>11:15 a.m. &#8211; CBS Special Report &#8211; The judge said at 10:00 a.m. Florida time Katherine Harris, the Florida Secretary of State could exercise her discretion in not considering manual vote count that is continuing in Florida, Palm Beach and Broward Counties at her discretion. His ruling will be appealed to the Florida Supreme Court.</p>
<p>This decision sets forth meme Judicial System to influence the decision of our 2000 Presidential Election in this next step in this Florida Supreme Court. The Secretary of State doesn’t have to</p>
<p>consider the hand recount going on in two counties which are under her jurisdiction. This is because of the ruling of a Florida County local Circuit Judge. Now the question is, will the Supreme Court step in before tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. when she will certify the votes, including absentee ballots that she intends to announce the winner of the election then? The Brower and Palm Beach counties will continue the hand recount over the weekend until they are finished in case that result is needed by the Florida Supreme Court. The judge that gave it the go-ahead was Florida Circuit Court Judge Terry Lewis. He said Katherine Harris has applied her reasoning judgement in denying the manual recount certification by the local Circuit Judge who is a Democrat.</p>
<p>Evaluation of the, decision making process (politics) use in the 2000 Presidential Election:</p>
<p>1. Candidate Al Gore’s politics is a continuation of the administration that he was the Vice- President in.</p>
<p>2. Candidate George W. Bush politics is a continuation of the administration of his father President George Bush.</p>
<p>1. The decision making process politics governing the United States of America would be a refinement of those decision making process of the (politics) of the previous Administration. This would be good.</p>
<p>2. The decision making process (politics) of this Administration, if it should come into existence, would be an escalation of the out-of-date of President George Bush that was the Vice- President to President Reagan. This would be bad.</p>
<p>1. And 2. Above is the hypothesis of the two different theories that this analogy will study.</p>
<p>Page 4</p>
<p>11-17-2000 4:30 p.m. Arizona time</p>
<p>The Florida Supreme Court ruled Katherine Harris couldn’t certify Florida vote until after the weekend, after they reviewed her wanting to certify the votes without hand counted votes from the 3 counties in question. Good for Al Gore’s campaign &#8211; the recount goes on in the Broward, Palm Beach and Dade counties. Dade County is now manually recounting their ballots. The Supreme Court of Florida enjoined Katherine Harris not to certify Florida’s vote until after an executive order Monday or later. Also, the Eleventh Federal Circuit Court in Atlanta denied George Bush’s petition to stop the manual recount of ballots in these three counties. Katherine Harris was heard to say at her office, &#8220;How many things can go wrong in one day.&#8221;</p>
<p>7:40 p.m. George W. Bush leads by 377 votes including unofficial absentee ballots so far. Some of these will go to court.</p>
<p>Katherine Harris, Secretary of the State of Florida, main job before Election Duties has been international contracts. What would the citizens of Florida that didn’t get their vote think if they knew how these contracts with corporations affected their jobs and economic security? In 4 looking at these meme theories in this political science I don’t claim any illegal responsibility that the corporations she is dealing with, that have their immunity from legal judgement, because of their corporate perfection from being responsible for actions that their corporation undertakes.</p>
<p>Memes about American success icons also gives a person like Katherine Harris and her government job an incorporated position the illusion of a great individual in the replication of these memes. I want it to be noted that this JLD Political Science Analogy: the use of Florida’s Secretary of State is the meme that is being replicated by a tremendous number of United States of America citizens as well as a magnitude of people from other nations around the world and she is like Al Gore and George Bush in their corporate protection and ability to have access to corporate monies inside and outside of their governmental corporate positions and connections.</p>
<p>The political use of these positions in respect to these citizens and individuals around the world is what is important. Greg Walters, the spokesman for Florida Supreme Court, announced that Katherine Harris couldn’t stop the manual recount of these three counties that are now doing this in predominately Democratic counties. One of these counties is the poorest county in Florida. Here is our only hope for the citizen’s protection. For non-incorporated citizens the overseas absentee vote official count has given Bush at least a doubling of his lead so far and many of these outside of these three counties as well as within were manually counted. Bush is ahead by 760 votes over Gore in attempting to get the 25 Florida electoral votes. The federal government leaves this part up to the state governments. When the electoral college reports to the federal government one senator and one congressman can challenge the electoral ballot results.</p>
<p>In JLD Analogy seeing all men are not equal under the law we should incorporate each individual citizen and ensure all corporations are equal under the law.</p>
<p>Recap of today’s final tally at the end of Nightline at 11:00 p.m. Arizona time including the overseas absentee ballots counted so far but not the manual recounted votes from Broward, Palm Beach and Dade counties. At 12:00 p.m. on the east coast Bush leads Gore by 760 votes for the 25 electoral votes of Florida which will determine the next President of the United States of America &#8211; less than 1000 votes one electoral college electors stole from one state in the not too distance past.</p>
<p>11-19-2000</p>
<p>With most of the absentee votes counted in Florida George W. Bush has approximately 930 vote lead for the 25 Florida electoral votes.</p>
<p>9:30 a.m. Arizona time I recorded Face the Nation and Meet the Press and part of ABC’s This Week on my tape #5 for political science study.</p>
<p>Continuing with my Analogy of All Men Are Equal Under The Law: I understand one of these three counties, Broward, Palm Springs and Dade is the poorest county in Florida. Could this be why they don’t have good balloting equipment? Could it be the poor citizens don’t deserve their vote according to the Republican campaign? In my political science study and analogy the answer to the above questions that are coming from this unusual time in our democracy. Tomorrow the arguments in the Supreme Court by the campaign lawyers and their supporting lawyer staff, 500 plus, will be the peak of special interest corporations applying economic pressure on our</p>
<p>Page 5</p>
<p> democracy where all persons are supposed to be created equal under the law — except corporations!!</p>
<p>2:45 Arizona time &#8211; On PBS Native American singing the Indian Blues! The Indian girls are singing all American men are created equal except Indians under the law. Are they a non-special interest corporation? Should all corporations be equal under American law?</p>
<p>Recorded AZ Channels 44 &amp; 40 News on tape Recount#5 Bush now leads Gore in Florida by 877 votes @ 10:10 pm.</p>
<p>11-20-2000 @ 12:00 Record the Florida Supreme Court session on the Florida Election.</p>
<p>12-2-2000</p>
<p>Recorded Meet the Press, Channel 2 &amp; This Week ABC 44 Face the Nation</p>
<p>12-9-2000</p>
<p>Channel 3 recorded Recount Going on in Florida. Lillian Kim recount mediated Dade County. William Daly said yesterday all ballots undercounts should be counted by Judiciary 9,000 votes &#8211; 68% of the people poled approved of this. 57 votes for Gore found in 2 counties recounted so far. No new numbers at 9:00 Arizona time.</p>
<p>This is the most important Political Science event in our democracy this century in JLD Analogy of Political Science a sub-section of JLD Analogy of Sociology in conjunction with JLD Analogy of Psychology. As it is obvious on PBS Arizona Channel 42 Leherer, Paul Degout in his job as Wall Street Journal reporter (has to) to protect his job take a strict republican role in his commentary on corporate America’s intense interest in this 2000 presidential election. This meme and our other memes in our corporate commercialized culture that are trying to enslave our American democracy to further corporate goals. This election is pitting the rich citizens against the poor in general. This is being done under the meme guise of race in many cases. Miami Dade County is an example of this. I believe the recount here should make this clear. Of course, we haven’t had one yet. Seminole County where the courts wouldn’t let the democrats through out the republican tampered with absentee ballots (which Vice-President Gore didn’t want to do anyway because he wants all votes if possible to count) is another meme to be studied. 9:40 recorded Channel 3 Recount Started 3 hours ago. Judge Lewis wants recount complete by 2:00 p.m. tomorrow. Now in Jack L. Doan’s Analogy’s I place</p>
<p>JLD Analogy of Economy as a subset of JLD Analogy of Politics though it is of</p>
<p>Paramount importance in the civilization of mankind on earth and in the future of mankind in the universe. The other basic analogies come first in order to understand JLD Analogy of Economy.</p>
<p>Page 6</p>
<p>At 12:45 Channel 2 special the U.S. Supreme Court put a stay (temporarily ?) On Florida’s not counted vote recount ? The same Supreme Court Justice that wouldn’t hear my Jack L. Doan case vs. Seagate Corporation Connors, Rehnquist and Scalia &#8220;lead 5 in the movement for this stay.&#8221; The others were Thomas and Kennedy. I know these judges like the Federal judges Kelly, Baldock and McWilliams Republicans that overturned the case that I won against Seagate on appeal that are notorious for the large corporations.</p>
<p>You can check ABC.com for the following that I recorded also at 4:30. MSN.com recorded at12:45. Downloaded MSN.com message in .html and .txt. Pulled into Corel will use it in study of political science memes in 2000 Presidential election. 9:00 tonight Dade County 9,000 ballots on a path to make up difference 58 votes gained so far by Gore. When Republicans complained Judge Lewis told them to be quiet. Hillsboro County 5,050 votes sorted out the dimpled chad ballots. 224 votes counted Gore got 2 and Bush got 1. Duvall County needed special hardware and software to sort the ballots but no sooner got it and one of the wives of the Judges counting called him of the news about the stay. Now ballots are under lock and key.</p>
<p>Page 7</p>
<p>12-10-2000</p>
<p>Meet the Press Channel 2 Arizona recorded. Dick Army monologue at Chris Dodd is an example of using political memes to discredit judges and candidates for the President of the United States of America. Very unprofessional. ABC This Week Gramm used the Republican meme sell that Bush has got to sell to congress his agenda.. Commercialism is the biggest economic problem with our judicial system and must be addressed. George Wells defended the Republican position in the ABC Round Table broadcast that even as Cookie Robinson said the under votes with poor balloting devices were in the poor peoples precincts and the undercount was much lower in the rich peoples precincts that there were no non votes that the Democrats want to look at. The special interest corporate designs in commercialism and economic enslavement of our nation must be analysed with memes.. Baker on Face the Nation was recorded stressed the time restraint of December 12. David Boise said December 18 is the time restraint. Scalia is his main obstacle in the U.S. Supreme Court. November 7 is the certification of the electoral deadline Trent Lott says. Florida legislators should step in if U.S. Supreme Court rules for Gore. Tom Delay shut Dade County down. CBS News Face the Nation Channel 40 Arizona Trent Lott thinks tax cut proposed by Bush possible which is definitely corporate special interest in this 2000 Presidential election will represent the richest Americans whose names are incorporated. Senator Dassel doesn’t agree. This Democrat minority leader has a good dialogue.</p>
<p>Supreme Court of the U. S. A. : 12-11-2000 MSNBC.com quote:</p>
<p>High court divide shows in questions</p>
<p>Attorneys for</p>
<p>both Bush, Gore</p>
<p>grilled in hearing</p>
<p>David Boies, representing Al Gore, argues the Democrats&#8217; case Monday</p>
<p>before the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>
<p>MSNBC STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS Page 7</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, Dec. 11, With the presidency hanging in the balance,</p>
<p>the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday publicly displayed the divisions</p>
<p>that surfaced in private over the weekend in a 5-4 decision halting</p>
<p>manual ballot recounts in Florida’s disputed presidential election.</p>
<p>The justices at times seemed really to be arguing with each other as</p>
<p>they bombarded lawyers for George W. Bush and Al Gore with questions</p>
<p>that focused on the key question of whether the state’s high court</p>
<p>exceeded its authority by ordering the recounts.</p>
<p>Do you think the Supreme Court was wise to stop the manual recount,</p>
<p>given the Tuesday deadline?</p>
<p>Yes, the recount was illegal.</p>
<p>No, the recount was legal and time is running out.</p>
<p>Do you think the nation faces a constitutional crisis?</p>
<p>Yes, the authority of the Constitution is in jeopardy.</p>
<p>No, the U.S. government can withstand the controversy.</p>
<p>Vote to see results</p>
<p>Do you think the Supreme Court was wise to stop the manual recount,</p>
<p>given the Tuesday deadline?</p>
<p>* 214390 responses</p>
<p>Yes, the recount was illegal.</p>
<p>68%</p>
<p>No, the recount was legal and time is running out.</p>
<p>32%</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Do you think the nation faces a constitutional crisis?</p>
<p>* 215647 responses</p>
<p>Yes, the authority of the Constitution is in jeopardy.</p>
<p>37%</p>
<p> </p>
<p>No, the U.S. government can withstand the controversy.</p>
<p>63%</p>
<p>Survey results tallied every</p>
<p>60 seconds. Live Votes Page 8</p>
<p>reflect respondents&#8217; views</p>
<p>and are not scientifically</p>
<p>valid surveys.</p>
<p>IT WAS NOT known when the court would rule, but with constitutional</p>
<p>deadlines looming, the justices were expected to decide the case soon.</p>
<p>As they did last week when the election dispute first reached their</p>
<p>ornate courtroom, the justices halted prepared arguments almost as soon as</p>
<p>they began to ask searching questions of the lawyers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where’s the federal question here?&#8221; Justice Anthony M. Kennedy</p>
<p>asked Bush’s attorney, Theodore Olson, less than two minutes into the</p>
<p>legal clash over the partial manual recount that the state Supreme Court</p>
<p>ordered last Friday, and that the U.S. Supreme Court halted less than 24</p>
<p>hours later.</p>
<p>Olson responded that the Florida Supreme Court had issued &#8220;a new</p>
<p>wholesale post-election revision of Florida’s election law&#8221; in its ruling,</p>
<p>thereby trumping the state Legislature’s authority.</p>
<p> Page 8</p>
<p>CONCERN FROM POTENTIAL SWING VOTES</p>
<p>Kennedy and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, both considered potential</p>
<p>swing votes on the divided court, expressed concern during Gore attorney</p>
<p>David Boies’ arguments that the Florida Supreme Court had exceeded its</p>
<p>authority.</p>
<p>Referring to the Florida court’s decision to waive the Dec. 14 date</p>
<p>for certification of the presidential vote, Kennedy indicated that he</p>
<p>views that action to be an unconstitutional rewriting of the election</p>
<p>rules.</p>
<p>&#8220;It would seem the Legislature could not have done that by a</p>
<p>statute without it being a new law and neither can the Supreme Court</p>
<p>without it being à a new scheme, a new system,&#8221; he said during an exchange</p>
<p>with Boies.</p>
<p>Boies also sparred with O’Connor on the question of whether the</p>
<p>state court had ignored the direction the federal court gave it last week</p>
<p>when it sent back a previous challenge to the recounts for further</p>
<p>consideration.</p>
<p>&#8220;I did not find a response by the Florida Supreme Court to this</p>
<p>court’s remand in the case a week ago,&#8221; O’Connor said. &#8220;It just seemed to</p>
<p>kind of bypass us. &#8230; I found that troublesome.&#8221;</p>
<p>Boies also was asked repeatedly about why the differing standards</p>
<p>used in different counties to attempt to discern voter intent during the</p>
<p>recounts wouldn’t violate constitutional equal-protection standards.</p>
<p>At one point, Justice David Souter appeared to suggest that the</p>
<p>federal court should consider establishing a uniform standard, asking,</p>
<p>&#8220;Why shouldn’t there be one subjective rule for all counties?&#8221;</p>
<p>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who opposed the suspension of the Page 9</p>
<p>recount on Saturday, questioned why the nation’s highest court should</p>
<p>overrule the Florida Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law and &#8220;say</p>
<p>what the Florida law is.&#8221;</p>
<p> Page 9</p>
<p>NO SIGNALS OF A CHANGE</p>
<p>In their questioning, the justices raised many of the issues that</p>
<p>have swirled around the recount that holds the key to the White House.</p>
<p>None of the questions gave any indication that any of the justices were</p>
<p>considering switching the votes they cast on Saturday when they halted the</p>
<p>Florida recount on a 5-4 vote.</p>
<p>Bush has been certified the winner in Florida by 537 votes, but</p>
<p>Gore looked to the recount to let him overtake his rival. The winner of</p>
<p>Florida’s 25 electoral votes stands to gain the presidency.</p>
<p>Advertisement</p>
<p>The Presidential Election and Other Cool Facts</p>
<p>No Ordinary Time by Doris Kearns Goodwin</p>
<p>Other books by Doris Kearns Goodwin</p>
<p>In remarks outside court after the arguments, which began at 11</p>
<p>a.m. and ended at 12:33 p.m. ET, Gore’s attorney, David Boies, said the</p>
<p>justices asked some questions&#8221;I wasn’t entirely prepared for,&#8221; though he</p>
<p>declined to say what they were. Boies characterized his portion of the</p>
<p>arguments as a 45-minute interrogation’ by the justices.</p>
<p>The historic arguments focussed on about 43,000 so-called under votes</p>
<p>ballots in which voting machines read no selection for president. The</p>
<p>Florida Supreme Court ordered the ballots to be recounted by hand, but the</p>
<p>U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday halted the recount until it could rule on</p>
<p>the dispute.</p>
<p>If the U.S. Supreme Court overrules the Florida high court, it will</p>
<p>effectively mark the end of the Florida recount fight and give the White</p>
<p>House to Bush. If the justices allow the Florida ruling to stand, Gore may</p>
<p>be able to get a final accounting of the disputed Florida votes, which he</p>
<p>hopes will put the state’s 25 Electoral College votes in his column and</p>
<p>make him the 43rd president of the United States.</p>
<p> Page 9</p>
<p>OTHER CHALLENGES UNRESOLVED</p>
<p>An adverse ruling by the nation’s highest court wouldn’t quite</p>
<p>count Gore out: There still are other unresolved election challenges</p>
<p>pending before various courts.</p>
<p>But an aide to Gore, who spoke with NBC News on Monday, made it</p>
<p>clear that the vice president’s camp views Monday’s legal showdown as the</p>
<p>last chapter. &#8220;There would be no alternative&#8221; but to concede if the court</p>
<p>comes down firmly against the vice president, the aide said.</p>
<p>SUPREME COURT JUSTICES</p>
<p>Page 10</p>
<p>JusticeDate of BirthAppointed bySworn in</p>
<p>William H. Rehnquist10/1/24Nixon1/7/72</p>
<p>John Paul Stevens4/20/20Ford12/17/75</p>
<p>Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor3/26/30Reagan9/25/81</p>
<p>Antonin Scalia3/11/36Reagan8/17/82</p>
<p>Anthony Kennedy7/23/36Reagan2/18/88</p>
<p>David Souter9/17/39Bush10/9/90</p>
<p>Clarence Thomas6/23/48Bush10/23/91</p>
<p>Ruth Bader Ginsburg3/15/33Clinton8/19/93</p>
<p>Stephen Breyer8/15/38Clinton8/3/94</p>
<p>Source: Congressional Quarterly</p>
<p>Political supporters indicated they would expect a concession</p>
<p>speech if the court rules against Gore. &#8220;If the court does overturn</p>
<p>Florida, this is moment for all to come together, and that would require</p>
<p>the vice president to recognize we’ve reached the end,&#8221; Sen. John Kerry,</p>
<p>D-Mass., said after listening to Monday’s arguments.</p>
<p>Gore waited out the hearing at home in Washington with his wife,</p>
<p>Tipper. Three of their four children, Karenna, Kristin and Albert III ,</p>
<p>accompanied campaign chairman William Daley and former secretary of state</p>
<p>Warren Christopher, the head of Gore’s legal team, to the Supreme Court</p>
<p>chamber to hear the arguments.</p>
<p>Bush, after checking with his legal team for an assessment of the</p>
<p>arguments, said he was &#8220;cautiously optimistic.&#8221; Earlier, as he arrived at</p>
<p>work at the Texas state Capitol in Austin, Bush said, &#8220;I am keeping my</p>
<p>emotions in check&#8221; until the high court rules. </p>
<p>PROTESTS NOISY BUT PEACEFUL</p>
<p>While the arguments unfolded inside, hundreds of demonstrators</p>
<p>noisily advocated both sides’ positions outside the building, beneath the</p>
<p>chiselled marble inscription &#8220;Equal Justice Under Law.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>More coverage</p>
<p>&#8220;Latest news</p>
<p>&#8220;U.S. Supreme Court ruling</p>
<p>&#8220;WashPost: Justices divided</p>
<p>&#8220;WashPost: Will Congress have a role?</p>
<p>&#8220;Newsweek&#8217;s Fineman: Disorder in the courts</p>
<p>&#8220;Fund: Justices rescue election</p>
<p>&#8220;Curry: Issues to be argued</p>
<p>Page 11</p>
<p>Profiles: U.S. justices</p>
<p>&#8220;Guide to legal battles</p>
<p>&#8220;Webcast: &#8216;PoliticsOnly!&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;Commentary and analysis</p>
<p>&#8220;Quick guide: Latest facts</p>
<p>Andrew Alexander, 19, of Harrisonburg, Va., dressed as Santa, held</p>
<p>up a sign that read, &#8220;Ho, ho, ho, Gore’s got to go.&#8221; His brother Stephen,</p>
<p>11, came along with his poster: &#8220;All I want for Christmas is Bush for</p>
<p>president.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nearby, a Gore supporter shouting &#8220;Who’s afraid of the Florida</p>
<p>vote?&#8221; stood on the sidewalk with a dark brown mule. About 200 Gore</p>
<p>supporters marched with printed signs reading, &#8220;This is America. Count</p>
<p>every vote.&#8221;</p>
<p>Boies represented Gore in the case, taking over for Harvard law</p>
<p>professor Laurence Tribe, who argued before the court for Gore last week.</p>
<p>A Gore lawyer said Boies was chosen because he had represented Gore on the</p>
<p>recounts in Florida and was more familiar with the issue than Tribe.</p>
<p>Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris joined Bush’s appeal,</p>
<p>and the justices Sunday gave her lawyer, Joseph Klock, 10 of the 45</p>
<p>minutes allotted to the Bush team.</p>
<p> Page 12</p>
<p>SHARP PUBLIC DIVIDE</p>
<p>The election dispute has divided judges and the nation, a new NBC</p>
<p>News opinion poll found 53 percent of those surveyed backed the U.S.</p>
<p>Supreme CourtÆs decision to suspend the Florida recount, 43 percent</p>
<p>disapproved.</p>
<p>In addition, 46 percent felt the high court was not the proper</p>
<p>place to decide the election, compared with 44 percent who felt it was.</p>
<p>And 53 percent believed the courtÆs 5-4 decision to suspend the</p>
<p>recounts was based mostly on politics, compared to 34 percent who felt it</p>
<p>was based mostly on the law.</p>
<p>The survey of 538 people was taken Sunday by the Hart-Teeter</p>
<p>polling firm. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.3 percentage</p>
<p>points.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>More results from NBC survey</p>
<p>ItÆs not clear when the Supreme Court will make a decision about</p>
<p>the Florida recount, but time is rapidly running out if it hopes to avoid Page 12</p>
<p>further constitutional complications.</p>
<p>The first in a series of deadlines comes Tuesday, the date</p>
<p>stipulated by the U.S. Constitution for Florida and every other state to</p>
<p>have selected their slates for the Electoral College.</p>
<p>If that deadline isnÆt met, the Constitution gives state</p>
<p>legislatures the power to choose the electors, and FloridaÆs</p>
<p>Republican-controlled Legislature, which is meeting in a special session,</p>
<p>has said it will step into the dispute if the courts havenÆt settled it by</p>
<p>then.</p>
<p>But many constitutional scholars argue that because the actual</p>
<p>voting by electors doesn’t occur until Dec. 18, Florida’s slate could be</p>
<p>chosen after Tuesday if manual recounts were resumed but not completed by</p>
<p>then. The validity of a slate of electors selected in this manner could be</p>
<p>challenged in Congress.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>&#8220;THEIR VOICE IS FINAL&#8221;</p>
<p>Watch the latest NBC and MSNBC reports on the Florida presidential</p>
<p>dispute.</p>
<p>Boies said on NBC’s &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; Sunday that if the justices</p>
<p>rule in Bush’s favor, it would be &#8220;the end of it. &#8230; Their voice is</p>
<p>final. They have the power to decide this&#8221;ö</p>
<p>But he declined to predict whether the vice president might delay a</p>
<p>concession until another case seeking to throw out Florida absentee</p>
<p>ballots works its way through appeal. &#8220;I’m not going to say what’s going</p>
<p>to happen in terms of pending Florida Supreme Court appeals,&#8221; Boies said.</p>
<p>Even if Gore wins the case, the high court would need to restart</p>
<p>the recount process and have it completed within a day or else any Gore</p>
<p>claim to victory would likely remain open to challenge.</p>
<p>In written briefs filed Sunday, both sides relied heavily on core</p>
<p>arguments they have repeatedly used in both state and federal courts:</p>
<p>Bush’s team maintained that the Florida court violated both the U.S.</p>
<p>Constitution and federal law by acting in conflict with Florida state law</p>
<p>and the state Legislature, thus violating federal requirements that only a</p>
<p>state Legislature may set the process of choosing presidential electors.</p>
<p>The Republican’s lawyers also said the standard for the recounting of</p>
<p>ballots was &#8220;arbitrary, standardless and subjective,&#8221; and violated federal</p>
<p>law by trying to set rules for resolving election disputes after Election</p>
<p>Day.</p>
<p>Gore’s team argued that the Florida high court’s decision &#8220;does nothing</p>
<p>more than place the voters whose votes were not tabulated by the machine</p>
<p>on the same footing as those whose votes were so tabulated.&#8221; The</p>
<p>Democrat’s lawyers also contended the Florida court merely acted to</p>
<p>clarify state law, not change it, and thus fulfilled its proper role of</p>
<p>&#8220;judicial review&#8221; in the election dispute.</p>
<p>Page 13</p>
<p>Full text of the Bush team&#8217;s briefs</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Full text of the Gore team&#8217;s briefs</p>
<p> </p>
<p>MSNBC.com’s Alan Boyle, Jon Bonn<span style="font-family:WP Greek Century;">1</span>, Mike Brunker and Miguel Llanos,</p>
<p>NBC’s Norah O’Donnell and Pete Williams and The Associated Press</p>
<p>contributed to this report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>U.S. Supreme Court documents in the Florida case</p>
<p>Florida election statutes</p>
<p>Florida Supreme Court documents filed in election cases</p>
<p>Opinions of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals</p>
<p>Leon County, Fla., Circuit Court</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fla. lawmakers hear from experts</p>
<p>Indecision 2000: Where we are</p>
<p>Follow case with MSNBC, NBC</p>
<p>Poll: Court right, but motive doubted</p>
<p>WashPost: Scalia holds pivotal role</p>
<p>MSNBC is optimized for</p>
<p>&#8221; Microsoft Internet Explorer</p>
<p>&#8221; Windows Media Player &#8221; MSNBC Terms,</p>
<p>Conditions and Privacy <span style="font-family:WP IconicSymbolsA;">1</span> 2000</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Cover | Headlines | News | Business | Sports | Local | Technology |</p>
<p>Living &amp; Travel | Health</p>
<p>TV News | Opinions | Weather | http://www.msnbc.com/m/c/sh/s.asp?0bb=-13 |</p>
<p>MSN | Comics | Find | About MSNBC | Help | Index</p>
<p>News Tools | Jobs | Write Us | Advertising on MSNBC | Terms, Conditions,</p>
<p>and Privacy&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Bush to urge public to leave divisions behind</p>
<p>George W. Bush smiles in response to reporters&#8217; questions as</p>
<p>he arrives at the state Capitol in Austin, Texas, on</p>
<p>Wednesday.</p>
<p>Bush to urge</p>
<p>public to leave</p>
<p>divisions behind</p>
<p>Presumed president-elect</p>
<p>to speak minutes after Gore</p>
<p>MSNBC STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, Dec. 13, In an address to the nation following the Page 14</p>
<p>tumultuous five-week election battle, George W. Bush planned to beseech</p>
<p>Americans Wednesday to help him heal partisan wounds, aides said. The</p>
<p>Texas governor and presumed president-elect will make his appeal for unity</p>
<p>just minutes after rival Al Gore concedes in his own nationally televised</p>
<p>speech.</p>
<p>Watch the latest NBC and MSNBC reports on the Florida presidential</p>
<p>dispute.</p>
<p>GORE SPENT SEVERAL hours alone with his family at his official</p>
<p>residence in the U.S. Naval Observatory mulling Tuesday night’s U.S.</p>
<p>Supreme Court ruling and privately pondering advice tendered by his</p>
<p>lawyers, advisers and friends, before deciding to drop out at midmorning</p>
<p>Wednesday, sources told NBC News.</p>
<p>Later, aides said the vice president would address the nation at 9</p>
<p>p.m. in a televised speech from the Vice President’s Ceremonial Room of</p>
<p>the Eisenhower Executive Office Building.</p>
<p>They indicated the vice president intended to telephone Bush,</p>
<p>probably before his address.</p>
<p>Almost as soon as Gore’s plans became clear, Bush’s team said the</p>
<p>Texas governor would speak an hour later. Aides indicated that Bush’s</p>
<p>speech would aim to unify Americans and heal partisan wounds inflicted</p>
<p>during the five-week dispute over the Nov. 7 election.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>WASHINGTON TRIP CONSIDERED</p>
<p>The aides to the Republican said a trip to Washington later this</p>
<p>week, perhaps on Friday, was being considered, which they hoped would</p>
<p>include a courtesy call on President Bill Clinton and a meeting with Gore,</p>
<p>if he is willing.</p>
<p>Bush waved to reporters as he strode into the Capitol in Austin,</p>
<p>Texas, at midmorning but just smiled in answer to questions about the</p>
<p>developments. At midday, as he emerged to leave for a workout, Bush said</p>
<p>he had not heard from Gore.</p>
<p>Privately, aides said Bush would not make any public statement</p>
<p>about his victory until Gore had conceded.</p>
<p>With Gore’s concession, the Texan will become the first</p>
<p>presidential candidate since Benjamin Harrison in 1888 to lose the</p>
<p>national popular vote but win the state electoral contest and thus the</p>
<p>White House.</p>
<p>Gore topped his Republican rival by more than 300,000 votes out of</p>
<p>103 million ballots cast nationwide. But Florida’s electoral votes, to be</p>
<p>cast on Dec. 18 and counted on Jan. 6, would give Bush a total of 271</p>
<p>electoral votes to Gore’s 267.</p>
<p> Page 15</p>
<p>How the post-election battle unfolded </p>
<p>Gore’s departure from the race unfolded quickly Wednesday, a day</p>
<p>after the U.S. Supreme Court trumped Florida’s Supreme Court by ruling</p>
<p>against manual ballot recounts in the crucial state.</p>
<p>Lawyers were still speculating early in the morning that the court</p>
<p>had left the door barely cracked open for another challenge. Shortly after</p>
<p>10 a.m., however, Gore campaign chairman William Daley closed that door.</p>
<p>The vice president has directed the recount committee to suspend</p>
<p>activities, he said in a written statement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>PHONE CALL FROM CLINTON</p>
<p>After telegraphing his intention to quit the race, Gore took a call</p>
<p>from President Bill Clinton, who is travelling in Northern Ireland. No</p>
<p>details of their conversation were available. Earlier, Clinton indicated</p>
<p>he might make a statement about the Supreme Court’s decision later in the</p>
<p>day.</p>
<p>Bush’s Republican running mate, Dick Cheney, was in Washington,</p>
<p>meeting with Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi, House</p>
<p>Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois and other GOP lawmakers, part of a</p>
<p>transition to power that now begins in earnest.</p>
<p>The General Services Administration, which controls the federal</p>
<p>governments infrastructure, said it would release $5.3 million in</p>
<p>taxpayer money and an office to Bush as soon as Gore conceded.</p>
<p>In Florida, meanwhile, where the GOP-controlled Legislature was</p>
<p>moving to endorse its own slate of electors for Bush, the state Senate</p>
<p>recessed on Wednesday to see what Gore said before deciding whether to</p>
<p>continue with its special session. State House lawmakers met Tuesday and</p>
<p>named a slate of electors to the Electoral College pledged to support</p>
<p>Bush.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>WHAT GORE WILL SAY</p>
<p>With the decision made to abandon the race, attention turned to</p>
<p>what Gore would say to Americans.</p>
<p>&#8220;U.S. Supreme Court ruling</p>
<p>Wash Post&#8217;s Broder: Bush&#8217;s victory carries a price</p>
<p>Fineman: Is it final?</p>
<p>Russert to Gore: Exit graciously</p>
<p>Hear case, read transcript</p>
<p>Profiles: U.S. justices</p>
<p>Guide to legal battles</p>
<p>Page 16</p>
<p>Webcast: &#8216;PoliticsOnly!&#8217;</p>
<p>Commentary and analysis</p>
<p>Quick guide: Latest facts&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;His speech is going to be the most important speech of his life,</p>
<p>not just for himself but for the country’s said Sen. John Breaux, D-La.</p>
<p>&#8220;What he says will set the tone for the next four years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sources close to the Gore campaign told NBC News that the speech</p>
<p>will &#8220;not be an angry speech.&#8221; They said the vice president, who planned</p>
<p>to write much of the address himself, would urge the country to unite</p>
<p>behind the next president. But they indicated that Gore also would explain</p>
<p>why he fought for five weeks to win the presidency, returning to his theme</p>
<p>that every vote should be counted.</p>
<p>A Gore confidant, who had spoken with the vice president early</p>
<p>Wednesday, said the vice president has told advisers that he considers the</p>
<p>Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling to be a partisan act but did not intend to</p>
<p>criticize the justices in his speech.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>SUPREME COURT REJECTS RECOUNTS</p>
<p>Gore made his decision to drop out after sleeping on a decision</p>
<p>delivered Tuesday night by a deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court that</p>
<p>reversed the Florida high court’s order for new recounts in the</p>
<p>presidential race. Seven members of the nation’s highest court said that</p>
<p>the Florida Supreme Court ruling ordering the recounts presented</p>
<p>constitutional problems. But the court then split 5-4 against new recounts</p>
<p>to remedy the problem.</p>
<p>In the majority were Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and</p>
<p>Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and</p>
<p>Clarence Thomas.</p>
<p>The majority ruled the recount ordered by the Florida court</p>
<p>violated equal rights protections and said that given the time</p>
<p>constraints, there was no way to conduct a new recount that would pass</p>
<p>constitutional standards.</p>
<p>The ruling, five weeks to the day after the presidential election,</p>
<p>said, &#8220;The recount process &#8230; is inconsistent with the minimum procedures</p>
<p>necessary to protect the fundamental right of each voter.&#8221;</p>
<p>U.S. Supreme Court rules on recounts</p>
<p>The court split 5-4 with the majority ruling that time constraints</p>
<p>did not allow a remedy to the constitutional problems presented by</p>
<p>the manual recount procedure as ordered by the Florida Supreme</p>
<p>Court.</p>
<p>Page 17</p>
<p>JusticeAppointed byNew recounts</p>
<p>possible</p>
<p>William H. RehnquistNixonNo</p>
<p>John Paul StevensFordYes</p>
<p>Sandra Day O&#8217;ConnorReaganNo</p>
<p>Antonin ScaliaReaganNo</p>
<p>Anthony KennedyReaganNo</p>
<p>David SouterBushYes</p>
<p>Clarence ThomasBushNo</p>
<p>Ruth Bader GinsburgClintonYes</p>
<p>Stephen BreyerClintonYes</p>
<p>Source: MSNBC research</p>
<p>The justices said the Florida court &#8220;ratified&#8221; uneven handling of recounts</p>
<p>in various counties. The standards &#8220;might vary not only from county to</p>
<p>county but indeed within a single county from one recount team to</p>
<p>another,&#8221; the court said.</p>
<p>Without a recount, the certification of Bush as the narrow winner</p>
<p>over Gore of Florida’s 25 electoral votes &#8211; and thus the presidency -</p>
<p>would stand.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the Dec. 12</p>
<p>date (for choosing electors) will be unconstitutional &#8230; we reverse the</p>
<p>judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering the recount to proceed,&#8221;</p>
<p>the court said.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>UNSIGNED OPINION</p>
<p>The justices issued the main ruling in an unsigned opinion.</p>
<p>Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas went further in a separate opinion, saying</p>
<p>the Florida Supreme Court also violated the Constitution and federal law</p>
<p>in ordering the recount.</p>
<p>Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Stephen Breyer and Ruth</p>
<p>Bader Ginsburg dissented.</p>
<p>In a blistering dissent, Stevens said, &#8220;Although we may never know</p>
<p>with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s</p>
<p>presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is</p>
<p>the nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the law.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Read the U.S. Supreme Court ruling</p>
<p> </p>
<p>SPIRITED DEBATE AFTER DECISION</p>
<p>After the decision was announced, sources said that a spirited</p>
<p>debate broke out among Gore’s advisers about what options might still be</p>
<p>available.</p>
<p>Several of Gore’s senior advisers and lawyers argued that a viable Page 18</p>
<p>path remained: An admittedly longshot bid to ask the Florida Supreme Court</p>
<p>to order a new ballot recount within the guidelines set forth in the U.S.</p>
<p>Supreme Court’s opinion.</p>
<p>Gore went to bed without announcing whether he would back such a</p>
<p>strategy. He had further discussions Wednesday morning with advisers and</p>
<p>his wife, Tipper, before deciding to quit, sources said.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> Page 18</p>
<p>While Gore was expected to set a conciliatory tone in his</p>
<p>concession speech, NBC’s Chip Reid reported there was considerable</p>
<p>bitterness among Gore aides over the court’s ruling. &#8220;The court, along</p>
<p>partisan and ideological lines, voted to run out the clock on the</p>
<p>election,&#8221; said a senior adviser who pointed out that the court had about</p>
<p>two weeks to give the Florida Supreme Court guidance on the matter and</p>
<p>never did. &#8220;It’s very clear a partisan five-vote majority constructed a</p>
<p>way to hand the election to George Bush.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>BUSH PLEASED AND GRATIFIED</p>
<p>Meanwhile, James Baker, the Bush point man in Florida, told</p>
<p>reporters that the Texas governor was &#8220;very pleased and gratified&#8221; with</p>
<p>the ruling.</p>
<p>&#8220;This has been a long and arduous process for everyone involved on</p>
<p>both sides,&#8221; Baker said in a terse statement to reporters. He took no</p>
<p>questions.</p>
<p>In the nation’s capital, cars honked and supporters of Bush cheered</p>
<p>after the ruling was announced.</p>
<p>Several prominent Democrats were quick to come out and say it was</p>
<p>time for Gore to throw in the towel after a five-week battle since</p>
<p>Election Day.</p>
<p>Sen. Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., was among them. &#8220;George Bush has a</p>
<p>very difficult four years ahead &#8230; restoring the confidence of the</p>
<p>American people in the presidency shattered by this election process,&#8221;</p>
<p>said Torricelli. &#8220;People need to put this election behind them and do so</p>
<p>very quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Decision 2000</p>
<p>America Reacts</p>
<p>&#8220;E-mail us about the election</p>
<p>But while Torricelli and others went on television to say Gore</p>
<p>should concede, another top party official pointedly disagreed. &#8220;The</p>
<p>Democratic Party does not think Al Gore needs to concede,&#8221; said Joe</p>
<p>Andrew, the national chair of the Democratic National Committee. &#8220;This is Page 20</p>
<p>his decision to make. We stand united behind him.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of Gore’s legal team, Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe,</p>
<p>initially said he agreed that the decision signalled a conclusive defeat</p>
<p>for Gore, and the &#8220;gracious thing&#8221; would be for Gore to concede. He also</p>
<p>called on Americans to &#8220;rally around&#8221; the decision even if they didn’t</p>
<p>like the results. Tribe later backpedalled, however, saying the decision</p>
<p>was lengthy and complicated and deserved closer study.</p>
<p> Page 19</p>
<p>MSNBC.com’s Mike Brunker, NBC’s David Bloom, Norah O’Donnell,</p>
<p>Claire Shipman and Pete Williams and The Associated Press contributed to</p>
<p>this report.</p>
<p>U.S. Supreme Court documents in the Florida case</p>
<p>Florida election statutes</p>
<p>Florida Supreme Court documents filed in election cases</p>
<p>Opinions of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals</p>
<p>Leon County, Fla., Circuit Court</p>
<p>Bush faces transition pitfalls</p>
<p>WashPost: The price of victory</p>
<p>Florida Senate waits for Gore to act</p>
<p>Gracious concession could help Gore&#8221;</p>
<p>Jana Bommersbach Commentary</p>
<p>&#8220;For the first time in my lifetime, actually the first time in a hundred years,</p>
<p>America has a president who wasn&#8217;t really elected.</p>
<p>George W. Bush will be sworn in as president next month, but half</p>
<p>of America knows he didn&#8217;t win the office and the other half</p>
<p>suspects it.</p>
<p>While on my little vacation, I have watched with dismay and</p>
<p>disgust as the United States Supreme Court dirtied itself by its</p>
<p>astonishing decision that five votes on the court were more</p>
<p>important than thousands of votes in Florida &#8212; and millions of</p>
<p>votes nationwide.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court may have the final say, but it doesn&#8217;t have the</p>
<p>final word and if you&#8217;re listening to the talk shows or national</p>
<p>public radio, you know that legal scholars throughout the nation</p>
<p>are just as shocked at the court&#8217;s jerry rigged decision as I am.</p>
<p>I know what it feels like to lose, but this doesn&#8217;t feel like</p>
<p>that. This feels like being mugged and robbed in an alley. History</p>
<p>is not going to be kind to the court&#8217;s decision or the outcome of</p>
<p>this election.</p>
<p>Page 20</p>
<p>Let us just review for one second. When the U.S. Supreme Court</p>
<p>stopped the recount in Florida last Saturday, the two men were</p>
<p>less than 100 votes apart in a state where 6 million votes were</p>
<p>cast. Less than 100 votes with some 43,000 to re-examine. The only</p>
<p>reason the vote was stopped was because everyone strongly</p>
<p>suspected that if you really counted those votes, Al Gore would be Page 21</p>
<p>the next president. After all, he&#8217;d already won the popular vote</p>
<p>across America. The official popular vote put Gore ahead by</p>
<p>337,576 votes. He&#8217;d actually won more votes than any candidate in</p>
<p>history except for Ronald Reagan, who had won America by a</p>
<p>landslide.</p>
<p>By the time the Supreme Court stopped the recount, most of America</p>
<p>had come to realize that election night predictions that Gore took</p>
<p>Florida weren&#8217;t mistakes at all.</p>
<p>But the high court says stop counting and then three days later,</p>
<p>rules that maybe Florida should count those votes if it had</p>
<p>standards on how to count them all the same, but whoops, it&#8217;s too</p>
<p>late now to count them at all.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s one word that describes their decision: Bushwhacked.</p>
<p>We will someday forgive that Bush stole the presidency, but I hope</p>
<p>we never forget it because you&#8217;re supposed to win the highest</p>
<p>office in the land fair and square. There is nothing fair or</p>
<p>square in what&#8217;s happened here.&#8221;</p>
<p>by Jana Bommersbach</p>
<p>From Page 0 #2 Memes Note Book inside of front cover:</p>
<p>12-23-2000</p>
<p>Page 21</p>
<p>I have been sick fighting an sinus infection that developed from a virus I probably picked up on an old Bowing 737 American Airliner out of Miami Airport in Florida on my way back from a Caribian cruise. I believe I would have recovered from ( what the doctors call an influenza virus) OK but my refill for my daily sinus pill CR Decongestant had run out and when I went to the drug store to get it refilled I found that the pharmaceutical corporations had taken all of those pills off the drug store shelves.</p>
<p>This part of my Analogies on this page 0 #2 Memes will be recorded in the PC records ending with &#8220;dialogue&#8221; recorded at next to last paragraph Page 6 above in thr PC records but on page 135 of #1 Memes Note Book that was last being copied from 12-10-2000 before the Supreme Court of the U. S. A. 12-11-2000 MSNBC.com quote down load there.</p>
<p>Start catchup from #1Memes Note Book copy to PC 11-12-2000 page 135:</p>
<p>Listened to U.S. Supreme Court today as the lawyers for Bush, Harris and Gore gave their oral arguments.</p>
<p>David Bois Vice President Gore’s lawyer was far the most articulate and used the least memes and carried the best dialogue.</p>
<p>This is shown in the MSNBC.com home down load hml starting artist photo of David Bois in focus on one side and Justice Ginsburg on the other side as he gave his oral argument on lifting the stay they have placed on the Florida recount of (what I call here as bad presidential election 2000 voting equipment and process). Art / item NBC news.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Page 22</p>
<p>12-12-2000 page 136 #1 Memes Notebook</p>
<p>12:15 p.m. waiting for U.S. Supreme Court to make their ruling on stay of 2000 Presidential Election recount in Florida for their 25 electoral college votes that will decide the presidency of the United State of America. If the republican justices drag this out for their normal four days or even half of that they will greatly impede the chances the democrats will have to correctly complete their recount of the popular vote that no doubt Al Gore will have in Florida. Also, today as they drag this out, the Florida legislature is giving the 25 Florida certified electoral college votes signed by Jeb Bush the Governor of Florida and brother of George W. Bush the Republican candidate for President to Bush. Their (U.S. Supreme Court and Florida Legislature) corporate special interest gain may be to try and keep this decision out of the federal government congress by insuring there is no other slate of electoral votes and get Bush’s brother Jeb Bush the Governor of Florida to sign the legislators slate of electors. Should this be what develops then JLD Analogy of Political Science will be developed and placed into history to the best of my ability to record the extent the rich will do to take away the poor votes counted.</p>
<p>The defining of rich and poor as well as political memes Rich and Poor will be the study of</p>
<p>JLD Analogy of Political Science with the sub-section JLD Analogy of Economy.</p>
<p>The question now is will the Florida popular vote for Al Gore be revealed to our nation before the presidency is decided or after? Yesterday I downloaded an article from MSCN on the fact that through Florida’s privacy act the true count of this popular vote would be revealed after the inauguration, if it isn’t revealed before by the American media.</p>
<p>On 12-12-2000 I stopped putting into my political science analogies which I checked the end of at 12-26-2000, until after the inauguration 1-20-2001. Now I will continue from 12-12-2000, what I wrote in my notebook &#8211; #1 Memes. Justice Stevens in the dissent to the,U. S. Supreme Court game, that remand back to Florida Supreme Court, verifies my opinion above about what I thought they were up to. So, at 8:44 12-12-2000, now my JLD Analogy of Religiosity is what will guide my future analogies of this tragedy. The Chairman of Democratic committee has now succumbed to the corporate special interest in getting Al Gore now to concede. Lawrence Dell also has succumbed to the money as well as Joe Lieberman. Nightline, 10:35 &#8211; 10:50. Fifteen minutes of saying Bush won a respectful victory presidency given to him by the Supreme Court while cowardly sending it mistakenly back to Florida Supreme Court. I recorded this on my VCR. 10:50 &#8211; Baker gloats that Bush is gratified. This republican conspirator with corporate oil interest speculation has caused our nation great grief that they don’t understand. The lawyers state the election is over as I thought it might happen by the Supreme Court game plan. Kathleen Sullivan, Gore lawyer advisor, says the Supreme Court killed Gore’s chance &#8211; Dissipated Florida Supreme Court also. She said she thought they should have given Gore until December 18 but they said the 12<sup>th</sup>, that was the day before today. Justice Stevens condemned Thomas, Scalia, Kennedy were corrupted the most. Render, democrat chairman, came on but said nothing yet.</p>
<p>11:05 &#8211; Democrat party chairman, Render retracted his statement that Gore should concede and now says Gore should proceed. Now Ed and the party are angry and say the Supreme Court of</p>
<p>Page 23</p>
<p>the U. S. A. are wrong in what they did. They did remand the case and Gore should look at the law of the land to see if there is an available legal remedy for the December 18. Mr. Render clears his position. Gore is downloading information and there is anger in the supporters in his home. Per Justice Stevens critic Gore will not say Bush got the popular vote in Florida. Bush is going to use his father’s Memes on being a great unifier if he claims victory. This is going to be a political science study of memes used by the rich against the poor in JLD Analogy of Political Science in the primarily republican initiatives in our nation. George Stephanopolus, the democratic now news commentator says when Gore comes out he will be gracious though he won’t say Bush got popular vote. David Gurgin, Gore’s leader, said it was over. But if the election is over but the political war has started. Times Headline &#8220;Court Overturns Recount &#8211; Bush Wins.&#8221; The republican party memes in politics has been states rights. Let the states have the power, not the federal government. Why was this in JLD’s Analogy of Political Science with economic sub-category with the paradigm of meme psychology? The corporate special interest of the economically well off wanted to use the state government that they could more easily control for their economic benefit was of the party’s objectives and derived their economic support from. Then, how when the republican party found their position of states rights wasn’t the meme that would advance their ambitions to use in getting their republican candidate for president the electoral votes in Florida they were the first to go to the federal courts in an attempt to keep the poor economic precincts from getting their vote that would give Florida’s popular vote to Gore. In my notebook of #1 memes inside the back cover from Florida’s democratic party on-line I put three pages of the article &#8220;Questions remain on Bush’s service as Guard Pilot.&#8221;</p>
<p>1-21-2001</p>
<p>This Sunday morning &#8220;Meet the Press on NBC’s KNAZ program&#8221;, James Carville said he is following the recount of Florida&#8221;s votes for this years president of U.S.A. and we will soon know who really got the popular vote in florida and if their electoral votes should have gone to the last eight years Vice President Al Gore the democrats candidate.</p>
<p>2-5-2001</p>
<p>I heard on TV Channel 3 I think that the New’s Paper’s recount of the 2000 election votes was to begin today in florida and possibly elsewhere.</p>
<p>Page 24</p>
<p>September 27, 2001 addition.</p>
<p>Now to put in perspective the Terrorist attack on the World Trade Cen-ter twin towers in Manhattan New York and the Pentagon in Washington D. C. with three airliners as well as the forth airliner that the passengers caused to crash in Summer-set Pennsylvania instead of making the tole on innocent lives even higher by hitting another heavy populated area. The tole of this terrorist attack was over two times as large as the attack on Pearl Harbor at the start of the Pacific part of World War Two. The citizens of our nation due to this toll of this terrorist attack were ready to follow the war procuration of our president ( a puppet of special interest corporations) George W. Bush. Putting this war into perspective, it is much different than the part of World War Two that the U. S. fought against Japan. But like the first part of World War Two and all wars the basic social economic problems are the same. These enemies were obvious with their stationary locations of their parent countries air forces , fleets and troops. Even with these obvious targets our government managed to mistake American Citizens of Japanese characteristics as the enemy. The mistakes in this Current Puppet George W. Bush war are much greater.</p>
<p>Page 25</p>
<p>My Analogy of Religiosity’s will be used to put this so called war against Theorist into perspective. The Korean Police Action, I will look up how many innocent victims got their lives taken before our government decision to take this action. Mabe this present war against theoristshould have been declared a police action. The over 5,000 innocent victims killed in the theorist attack are very serious damage to our nations psyche, economy and government politics (decision making process) to take this action (to declare an undeclared) war on theorist.</p>
<p>Page 26</p>
<p>Patriotism is different than religiosity but, each can play on the other. Play is a bad word to use in the analysation of these behaviours. The religiosity of the terrorist that attacked the World Trade Centre Twin Towers and attempted to attack the White House is Islam or any basic religion of the country they come from but a perverted off shoot of Islam. Their Patronize objective though was in relation to the religiosity of a group of individuals within their country and countries. In analysing different religiosity’s and patronises there are many:</p>
<p>1. The Irish Protestant offshoot of IRA religiosity versus Catholic offshoot of religiosity</p>
<p>2. The Palestinian offshoot of Mohamad-ism religiosity versus the Jewish offshoot religiosity.</p>
<p>3. Kosova Bosnia Moslem religiosity offshoot versus Serbian Christian offshoot religiosity of ethnic cleansing group in that country.</p>
<p>4. Yugoslavian Bosnia Moslem religiosity offshoot versus Christian religiosity offshoot ethnic cleansing group in that country and the above country.</p>
<p>5. The USA religiosity offshoot of Capitalism versus the Afghanistan Moslem Islamic offshoot of the Taliban religiosity that the terrorist identify with in theorist networks through out the world.</p>
<p>6. The Russian belief system that used to be communism religiosity offshoot versus Afghanistan Moslem Islamic offshoot religiosity and now their Capitalist offshoot religiosity versus the Chesneyan offshoot religiosity.</p>
<p>PAGE 27</p>
<p>The above half dozen conflicts all have their related patriotism. There are many more to be listed from the time of the start of World War Two’s German religiosity Third Rank Christian offshoot versus the Jewish offshoot religiosity in that country and similar offshoots of the religiosity’s of the Third Rank and other countries. As well as English, Irish and American offshoots of religiosity’s and patriotism Including the offshoots of American religions and religiosity’s and patriotism versus Japanese offshoot from their religion’s religiosity’s patronise Kamikaze on up through African countries conflicts. The Capitalist Christian offshoot coalition in the Gulf War with Moslem, Christian and Jewish Nations Versus Iraq Moslem offshoot of Saddam Hussain religiosity and now Versus Osama bin Laden Islam religiosity offshoot from Saudi Arabian religiosity Moslem, Islam to the new Saudi-funded schooling of Wahhabis.</p>
<p>Page 28</p>
<p>The U. S. capitalist’s religiosity vs. the Russian communist religiosity through its proxy war support of Afghanistan Islamic offshoot schooled by Warby religiosity of Jihad against communist up through 1989 the Governmental religiosity offshoots of capitalism playing upon patriotism is led by the Bush family as President of U. S. puppets to corporations, CEO’s and the military industrial complex to examples in the Middle East with the creation of two monster religiosity’s around two individuals that they helped to create: Sadam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. Sadam Hussein was created by sub-puppets Henry Kissinger, for oil concerned corporations in building to the point an attack against Kuwait was incorporated until our government was found out to have gone too far. The same is true in the creation of the religiosity and patriotism of Afghanistan, Islam, Wahhabism offshoot religiosity monster Osama bin Laden who was trained and supported by our government and handled the finances of supporting Afghanistan against the Russians through the CIA in our cold war against communism religiosity. After Afghanistan northern alliance defeated Russia in their attempt to subjugate them our government puppets were allowed to turn their backs on these people that were used by us and the monster Islamic offshoot religiosity and Osama bin Laden continuous Jihad against capitalism that intruded into the homeland of the religiosity and patriotism that was the result of conflicting with our capitalist offshoot religiosity. In my analogy of religiosity to put our current events into perspective this simplified approach to see whata type of education of the worlds population on their religiosity is needed to further evolve their basic religion so that these offshoot religiosity’s will not be so detrimental to their humanity, survival, security and intellectual self actuation. To start using my analogy on religiosity from the start of my analogy recorded because that is what I know along with people like professor Kenneth Miller Religiosity of Brown University of his concept of supporting classical religions creation-ism in concert with Darwinism and modern science which through I don’t know of this from anything except the briefest exposure to this through TV commentary presentations of the very same sound bites it seems to be in harmony with my analogy.</p>
<p>Page 29</p>
<p> Along with Calvin Beard’s professor of computer studies on religiosity’s at Memphis Methodist University that I don’t know much about except from the briefest encounter with him on vacation a half of a lifetime ago. Where his brief explanation of politics as being a decision making process indicated to me the value of the study of religiosity’s. I will now try and track down more information on these two individuals vocations. I just came across Kenneth Miller’s ideas so that should be easy and he has a book with a title &#8220;On finding Darwin’s God&#8221; on relating God to Darwinism. The Calvin Beard work of 35 years ago may be somewhat harder to track down. Now the definition of corporate executives, some of which they and their business’s I find very bad for the world community to start with I take from the following copy of pages 27 through 30 of &#8220;THE BASICS OF INVESTING Fifth Edition&#8221; by Benton E. Gup CHAPTER 2.</p>
<p>Page 30</p>
<p>Figure 2-2 Common stock ownership. The figure referred to in the 2<sup><span lang="EN-CA">nd</span> </sup>paragraph under the Heading Ownership on the copy of page 30 which is on the top of &#8220;CHAPTER 2 EQUITY SECURITIES&#8221; page 31 which I make a drawing of below:</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/Image7.gif" alt="" width="11" height="38" align="left" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Page 31</p>
<p>As stated before the basics of war is economics and the (love of death) that is when a group of people or an individual become frustrated enough He, She or they will in order to gain some semblance of control in death as the vehicle of control either some perceived enemy or their own. In all levels of creatures with intelligence their evolution of their genes has been accompanied by the evolution of their memes. Homo Sapiens intelligence in understanding their environments the best they can in responses and consequences of their actions within it developed religions The use of belief systems to frustrate other individuals and members of the group and or other groups for economic advantage became the religiosity, the overall defining memes of that members identity and control that can be replicated by other members. Religiosity’s can be an offshoot of the religion or lack of religion that influences the replication and evolution of a mem.</p>
<p>The psychological involvement of the memes and religiosity must be understood in dealing effectively with the war against terrorist that was started soon after September 11, 2010 in Afghanistan by the USA and UK with a coalition brought about by scripted puppets of global corporations group lead by George W. Bush administration against a group lead by Osama Bin Laden protected by the Teliban initially inside Afghanistan with meme , religiosity of Islamic- Wahhabism religiosity group that have grievances against the perceived cause of their poor economic status.</p>
<p>USA troops ran into Osama Bin Laden trained troops activity in Somalia where their religiosity offshoot from Moslem Islamic religion AlQaeda had already developed a hatred of USA Judo-Christian religion offshoot of Capitalism religiosity and caught the helicopter that was bringing in USA troops that were trying to capture or git rid of a Somalian war lord. The Afghanistan Osama Bin Laden troops were there in Somalia to protect that war lord shot down this helicopter and killed its occupants when another two helicopters tried to rescue their fallen comrades they lost many troops. The USA troops left Somalia because of this action that Afghanistan’s Osama Bin Laden</p>
<p>trained troops, much as Russia had left Afghanistan forced out by USA, CIA including Osama Bin Laden trained troops.</p>
<p>We must learn how these intelligence limiting but highly motivating religiosity’s with the effects in psychology and sociology like in JLD Analogies can be used to educate this worlds populations. As stated before in these sciences like the JLD Analogies of science mentioned before the Scientific methods must be evolved to include integrated knowledge like in all of my JLD Analogies.</p>
<p>Page 32</p>
<p>10-11-01</p>
<p>On the Lair Hour Channel 8 AZ tonight at 6:30 PM half way through the professors on Moslem &amp; Islamic Arabs nailed the reason for our current conflict. These Arabs feel poor like second class world citizens and out of control, this is why the Saudi Arabian warby religiosity offshoot from Moslem Islamic religion Appears like in all wars to give them some control ( they can take the life of advisory and or their own.</p>
<p>From my experience in the example of Navaho heritage and belief system offshoot religiosity versus the USA Judo-Christian ethic in our capitalistic offshoot religiosity in the case of two individuals I met at Hawley Lake Arizona where my father was working with the Indian Bureau training the Apache men how to build small tourist cabin showing them how it was done. As long as he would show them how they would work along wit h him. When they came to build the next cabin they would work with him as long as he showed them how to build it but when he asked Page 32</p>
<p>them to build some of it on their own or start another cabin the would not precipitate or do any more work. In Apache heritage the women would work on the shelters and as long as they had a shelter over their heads to get in out of the weather they were content and unmotivated in the completion of the training.</p>
<p>The Navaho individual had worked at their camp store and she was very trainable. To continue his training the Apache individual went with the Navaho girl to the University of Arizona. The neighbour of mine for a short time a white man and his Mexican wife told me that he and his wife had also went to the University of Arizona when she was his girlfriend. She roomed with the Navaho girl on campus and He roomed with the Apache boy on campus. They were all friends and did well at the University and my neighbour married the Mexican girl and the Apache boy married the Navaho girl. In this group of the for of them the Indians did well and could have competed in our competitive capitalist culture. The Navaho people don’t normally progress in competitive schooling because the slowest and hardest to train in their peer group sets the pace for the will not try and show up their comrades like we do in our competitive capitalistic culture. Their Indian heritage and memes drew them back to Hawley Lake where they worked at the camp store. But still they had a problem this Apache and his Navaho wife. They were not accepted by either of their tribes and they also had a mixed race marriage which was acceptable in the University’s culture but not in the White Mountain area in which their tribes lived. Having lost control of his economic capability in hi heritage he became very frustrated and eventually to gain control he committed suicide. His wife then wanted the security of a tribe but neither her Navaho or his Apache tribe would accept her.</p>
<p>Now with this above experience and offshoot religiosity’s and memes what could have been done to understand and prevent the unresolvable conflict. As the professor on the 10-11-01 Lair Hour said we have a class and religious problem. Class comes from each groups social economic cast system. Religion comes from individuals in the groups attempt to comprehend where they come from and what are they to do to survive if possible.</p>
<p>11-27-01</p>
<p>After Lair hour Egyptian writer Ali Salim understands what my dilemma consist of, which I will explain.</p>
<p>Antony Lewis a professor in USA and a American citizen is from Afghanistan and he also knows what my dilemma consist of .</p>
<p>The San Diego Tribune executive John Perkins ( my impression as being a Republican uncle Tom and I will check this out to see if there is any truth in my impression) is an example of what has formed my dilemma, which ill also explain.</p>
<p>In the USA President Reagan in encouraging the Afghanistan people ti fight as the did to force the Russian invasion out of their nation of Afghanistan used the Religiosity that was convenient to his Capitalistic Religiosity to fight for GOD against the Russian Infidels.</p>
<p>My dilemma in this new analogy on believing all people should be treated as equals and religiosity’s that are used to not treat people as equals is described below:</p>
<p>I detest the Wahhabism Religiosity spinoff from the Moslem Islamic religion that in the Taleeban government of Afghanistan that took the jobs from the Afghanistani women and made them second class citizens. Also the use of this religiosity to create to mislead their people into martyrdom in a Jihad against other religiosity’s that they rationalize into the only cause of their lack of control. The use of these frustrations to give those who frustrated people to gain control Page 33 over people that are not considered as equals. But as much as I detest this Wahhabism Religiosity I also detest the Capitalistic Religiosity and how it doesn’t treat people as equals and caters to the Corporations that operate as if they have more rights than individuals that they do not treat as equals.</p>
<p>There is much more to this new Analogy of my dilemma but we will start the description here:</p>
<p>Using my analogies up to this point (see all of JLDAnalogies) I must now first concentrate on the other side of my dilemma to be used in this present analogy’s dilemma.</p>
<p>Page 33</p>
<p>I have strong feelings of patriotism and love for my family and fellow citizens. To deal with the dilemma of my thinking in my analogies I must do as Ali Salim the Egyptian writer says he does with his dilemma of how to live with his advisories in a culture is to write about it. The similar case that I am in where the majority of my fellow citizens with disapprove of some of my thoughts and analogies the one thing I can do for my piece of mind and aspirations to contribute to humanity is to keep on writing about these thoughts and analogies. In regard to peace of mind I member about 50 years ago I read a book written by 2 psychologist a man and his wife titled Peace of Mind and in it writing about the abnormal person it was stated that this person trended to write on the wall so large that the normal person had to realise he could read it as he was running away. I hope the majority of my fellow citizens which are the norm in our culture might be able to read my small writing as they run away from my thoughts.</p>
<p>In 1990 the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan was what The USA citizens considered bad and the Taleeban good, Night ine channel 15 Arizona TV ABC show points out this dilemma that the USA Presidential Administration has created by its Capitalistic Religiosity.</p>
<p>11-30-01</p>
<p>The USA Presidential Administration now has created a big problem. There are thousands of Taleeban prisoners it is thought and only a very few Al Qaeda leaders is all the administration supposedly wants. When the Northern Alliance with the aid of the CIA and USA Aircraft Bombing took Kabul and just outside a large prison turned out to be a problem when as a CIS man observed by reporters was killed while interviewing these prisoners that 2 prisoners by bringing grenades in with them blew up sparked an uprising that the USA Aircraft Bombed to subdue and the Northern Alliance was shooting them like fish in a barrel. Some of these poisoners had there arms tied behind them. This part of the PR war is a problem. One of these prisoners was an American it was found out later that joined the Taleban because they were fighting to survive being a poor nation Kandahar is now the problem as the Northern Alliance and a thousand USA military troops approach with the CIA etc. there will be thousands of more prisoners from this town. If all these perishers decide to have a Jehad of martyrs then the USA will have a tremendous problem in their PR War of this current administration.</p>
<p>Until this paradigm of bad psychology in the USA UK, French German , Italian, Russian Capitalistic Religiosity is changed. Now with emerging capitalism in other industrially developing nations these troubles are going to be with us in our world like it has been in Iran, Irak, Bosnia, Kosova, Chesinia, Armenia, Somalia, Palestine, Pakistan, India, Indonesia, and many other nations.</p>
<p>11-29-01</p>
<p>How many civilian innocent people killed in Afghanistan today? Two Kids were hurt and put in hospital. Later today I heard on the radio there were 2 dozen citizens killed in Afghanistan that USA bombing caused. In Israel 2 suicide bombers injured 100 and killed 25.</p>
<p>Page 34</p>
<p>JLD Analogy of Capitalism Religiosity that got the USA into a coalition with England and other developing industrialised nations in the 2001 war against terrorism. There are Moslem persons on this earth and most of these persons are not from industrialized nations or industrial developing nations. These persons do not have a wealthy standard of living and are often exploited by industrialised nations. The Judo-Christian ethics of industrialised nations have evolved this capitalistic religiosity.</p>
<p>JLD Analogy of Capitalistic Religiosity in a nation is an offshoot from the Christian and of the Judo Religions that the industries and governments have rationalised into this capitalistic religiosity. The memes of individuals that replicate the capitalistic religiosity are often tied to the memes of the nations patriotic replications. This has developed into the psychological bad paradigm in our USA government’s politics (decision making process). The practice of separating church and state has not been followed. John Ashcroft the USA Attorney General said today 12-3-2001 that he was scrutinising religion in this war against terrorism. The Presidential Administration war on terrorism already is profiling Arabs, and now is profiling the Moslem religion. These actions in the current presidential administration’s replicated throughout the justice system and military in their personal relations war will cause the USA enormous problems. Already Nations like Spain will not release to the USA suspects of Al Qaeda because of the USA current administration’s obtaining from the Congress the ok to have military tribunals in this undeclared war.</p>
<p>With the patriotism is commercialism in the exaggerated mems of bad psychology in individuals of our nations capitalistic religiosity. This bothers me when the opportunistic George W Bush with the aid of corporations monies and influence acquired the presidency of our nation appears in travel advertisement using patriotism to sell in order to stimulate our economy under his administration’s bad memes.</p>
<p>I am a person that all my life due to my upbringing have never had discrimination thoughts and memes against anybody. But in the progress of my career have had increasing dislikes for the extensive development of commercialism and irresponsibility of corporate behaviours that have effected our government and justice systems. I have been in hopes during this time that our fellow citizens would have evolved in their capability of staying out of war. The police action instead of our congress and senate declaring war in Korea and Vietnam were attempts our government pursued in this, but as commercialism and greed of corporations increased the Gulf War Coalition fighting lead by our former president Bush without the declaration of war by our congress and senate was the replication of these bad psychological commercialised special interest corporations memes that have evolved now in the same groups of individuals to the behaviour under our current presidential administration, from the Gulf War Administration to the present war against those with a terrorist religiosity offshoot from the Moslem Islamic Religion that oppose these memes of our and other industrially developed nations has brought me to discriminate the behaviours of all the source causing individuals trying to influence the economies of our world by using war. I was in hopes that our citizens would come to realise like I have that the basics of what causes war is economics of different groups. The other basic of the cause of war is the lack of control individuals have in their economics and government. Another basic human bad psychological meme is that if frustration in the lack of control gets to be too much to bear, you can kill yourself and or kill the individuals that are frustrating you in your lack of control, bad behaviours that I hope our world citizens can evolve out of as I have. There is an intelligent</p>
<p>Page 35 </p>
<p> </p>
<p>way of dealing with these bad memes and I discriminate against the behaviour of individuals that want to control their more affluent positions in their economies by frustrating and taking away the control other individuals have.</p>
<p>An example of specifics on how the above applies is in the experience of my economics the Republican Political (decision making process) Party and their catering to the richer citizens and corporations of our nations benefit me. Though my personal economics are better due to results from their decision making process, I still discriminate against their politics. My peace of mind has never been in trying to economially succeed by gaining more money in my career. The memes I formed as a youth replicating from my father who replicated from the rural agriculture background of his father which was not to strive to prosper at the detriment of others. These memes are similar to those in the Navaho’s heritage. I’m a patriotic American that desires that which is good for my fellow citizens. I want to produce value that will benifit our socity as well as the world community.</p>
<p>My dilemma would be less and my peace of mind would be greater if my fellow citizens would be able to follow their consciousness and if they wouldn’t allow the capitalist religiosity with corporate commercialism to brain wash them into memes that are being pushed at them to be replicated in this bad psychology. Now the question is what can I do to reveal to my fellow citizens a reason to look into this.</p>
<p>In the past war happened when two nations or groups of people (within a nation and or outside of the nation) became depressed economially like in World War Two. Since then the capitalist have realised that a nations economy can be stimulated by war and corporations profiting from the military industrial complex. These observations need to be researched and if found to be true this can be used to reveal to the citizens of these nations what is going on and my fellow citizens will have a clear reason to do something to stop these bad psychological replications of the mems that corporations in our nations industrial military complexes are using to profit from the determent of people that they don’t treat as their equal.</p>
<p>12-07-01</p>
<p>TV channel 2 Arizona, Dateline, &#8220;The Roots of Rage&#8221; like in Newsweek written by international editor Fareed Zakaria, raised in India in a secular Moslem family writes. In this essay there are five parts. Starting on Page 22 &#8220;Why do They Hate Us? Copied below is the last part of this essay part &#8220;IV. What To Do&#8221;:</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Page 36</p>
<p>9-16-2008</p>
<p>Today on C-Span broadcast of our Senate early this afternoon Arizona time Berninie Sanders Independent political party spoke on the political and economic dilemna in our nation. When he was in the House of Representives Phil Gramm led legistration that deregulated financial institutions which is the cause of the financial dilemna and stock market  crash yesterday. The regulation that was put in place in 1930 was what was to prevent the facters that caused the 1929 stock market crash to cause another crash. Phil Gramm&#8217;s legislation reversed that prevention. Gorge W. Bush and John Mcain were of simular mind set. Phil Gramm was the financial advisor to John McCain&#8217;s campain . See Page 7 (12-10-00) above is the only referance to Gramm before this paragraph. Phil Gramm after providing the Enron loop hole in our financcal legistration went on to lead us into the bad energy policies in our econimy. His wife was the head of our goverment&#8217;senergy regulation inforcment that was deluted and has brought us to todays energy delimina. So that history dosn&#8217;t repeat itself like in the 1929 crash our goverment shoud repeal the bad polocies that were promoted by the individuals in this paragraph. A new post has been started.</p>
<p>9-17-08</p>
<p>The crash of Lehman Brothers that survived the 1929 crash earlier this week didn&#8217;t get a bailout by our government when they went banckrupt like was done for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  Bank of America bought out Countrywide and Merrill Lynch.  Banks like Bear Sterns was bailed out by us tax payers. Now AIG is being bailed out. Senator Shelby asked before noon Arizona time today on CNBC if AIG bailout is enough of our taxpayyers money.  Gold increasted $80 a ounce also the value of Silver.</p>
<p>Candidate Obama for president at noon Arizona time said in Nevada that Phil Gramm was to blame for todays problem and John McCain took national finance advise from Phil Gramm. Political economic professor said tonight on Leherer newshour that these bailouts shouldn&#8217;t have happened for private interest. Our government should be concerned about our plubic interest. </p>
<p>9-18-08</p>
<p>England come out today strongly against Shortselling and the Dow ralied. The leaders of both houses of our goverment met together with the leaders of our goverment&#8217;s financial institution met today and our financial market ralied even more.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/Image5.gif" alt="" width="8" height="144" align="left" /><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/Image6.gif" alt="" width="13" height="43" align="left" /></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/120/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=120&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/jack-l-doans-political-decision-making-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/Image7.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/Image5.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/Image6.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Electron Model Recurrence in next Jack L. Doan&#8217;s &#8220;J_Wave 4 Dimensional 137 small to 1 J_Electron</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/old-electron-model-recurrence-in-next-jack-l-doans-j_wave-4-dimensional-137-small-to-1-j_electron/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/old-electron-model-recurrence-in-next-jack-l-doans-j_wave-4-dimensional-137-small-to-1-j_electron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/old-electron-model-recurrence-in-next-jack-l-doans-j_wave-4-dimensional-137-small-to-1-j_electron/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old Electron Model Resurrected In the atomic world, retro is in style. Almost a century after physicists showed that electrons don&#8217;t naturally move in simple orbits like planets around the sun, but instead smudge into waves, the simple orbit is making something of a comeback: Researchers forced an electron into a planetlike orbit and kept [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=119&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-118" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/old-electron-model-recurrence-in-next-jack-l-doans-j_wave-4-dimensional-137-small-to-1-j_electron/118/" title="old-electron-modeljpg.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/old-electron-modeljpg.jpg?w=480" alt="old-electron-modeljpg.jpg" /></a></p>
<h2>Old Electron Model Resurrected</h2>
<p>In the atomic world, retro is in style. Almost a century after physicists showed that electrons don&#8217;t naturally move in simple orbits like planets around the sun, but instead smudge into waves, the simple orbit is making something of a comeback: Researchers forced an electron into a planetlike orbit and kept it steady for thousands of revolutions. Their feat shows that it&#8217;s possible to precisely control the movement of an electron within an atom indefinitely&#8211;a trick that may eventually lead to better lasers.</p>
<table border="0" align="left" width="350" cellPadding="5">
<tr>
<td>The above image was moved from here in Jack L. Doan&#8217;s copying of this Kim Kireger&#8217;s article.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Old model revisited.</b> A new study shows that electrons can be forced to move in classical orbits.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Back in the early days of atomic theory, Ernest Rutherford and Niels Bohr proposed a model of the atom that showed electrons as particles orbiting the nucleus. Later, this model was overhauled, when physicists decided that it made more sense to describe electrons as waves, swinging through areas that sweep out, fan-shaped, from the nucleus. But even after this wave-like description of the electron was accepted, some physicists insisted that it must be possible to tame the electron into a particle-like creature. Erwin Schrödinger thought so. Famous for the wave equation that describes electron orbitals, Schrödinger devised combinations of waves that move together like a particle. But other physicists claimed that this would only work in contrived situations, not real atoms.</p>
<p>Now, physicists Haruka Maeda and Thomas Gallagher of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville have shown that both Schrödinger and his detractors were right. It&#8217;s possible to force an electron to orbit like a particle, by manipulating an atom. First, they pointed lasers at a lithium atom until its outermost electron had a very high energy. Then they pulsed a microwave field around the atom. The field resonated with the electron&#8217;s motion and forced the electron to orbit at the same frequency as the field; the regular kicks from the microwave field kept the electron at this frequency. The electron then orbited the nucleus in an ellipse 15,000 times before the researchers stopped the experiment, they report in 2 April <i>Physical Review Letters</i>.</p>
<p>The experiment is &#8220;very clean [and] beautiful,&#8221; says Dominique Delande of the Pierre &amp; Marie Curie University in Paris. &#8220;There are absolutely no ambiguities in what they have observed.&#8221; Previous researchers have tried similar techniques but only succeeded for tens of orbits of the electron. According to Delande, locking the motion of the electron with a microwave gives great control over an atom, and it might be used to produce extremely pure light for certain types of lasers.</p>
<p><b>&#8211;KIM KRIEGER</b></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=119&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/old-electron-model-recurrence-in-next-jack-l-doans-j_wave-4-dimensional-137-small-to-1-j_electron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/old-electron-modeljpg.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">old-electron-modeljpg.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/112/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/112/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Thomson, Science Director and Jim D. Bourassa, Executive Director, at an international scientific conference at Imperial College, London, UK  The Aether Physics Model and Superstring theory It is clear that the string theorists were very close to our Aether Physics Model (APM): the &#8220;graviton&#8221; is theorized to be 2-spin, like our Aether Unit, their [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=112&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;"><a title="j_elctrnspnjpg.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-113" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/112/attachment/113/"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_elctrnspnjpg.jpg?w=480" alt="j_elctrnspnjpg.jpg" /></a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">David Thomson, Science Director and Jim D. Bourassa, Executive Director, at an<br />
<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-09/qai-pio090206.php" target="new">international scientific conference</a> at Imperial College, London, UK </span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;"> </span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;"><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;">The Aether Physics Model and Superstring theory</span></strong></span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;"> </span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">It is clear that the string theorists were very close to our Aether Physics Model (APM): the &#8220;graviton&#8221; is theorized to be 2-spin, like our Aether Unit, their elimination of a point particle (which allows a merging of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity by eliminating infinities) by defining the &#8220;atoms&#8221; of spacetime resembles our Aether Unit, their vibrating string is similar to our tubular loxodrome, the sizes are exactly the same (at quantum-scale), and string theorists see the need for 10 or 11 dimensions, like our APM. They even come close to the Aether Unit geometry with their Calabi-Yau shapes. However</span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">, Strings are theorized to be one-dimensional, linear structures. The APM incorporates linear structures as well as two-dimensional structures (tubular loxodrome). We have a multidimensional approach, which is based entirely upon analyzing the quantum constants and the data that produced them.</span></p>
<div><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">An important difference between the Superstring theory and APM is that we recognize dimensions as including not only length, but frequency, mass, and charge. Mass is a single dimension and there are two different types of charge, each having two dimensions. So there is the one dimension of mass, two dimensions of frequency, three dimensions of length, and four dimensions of charge, a total of 10 dimensions. There is also the pseudodimension of sphericity, commonly referred to as 4pi.</span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">It is one of the strong suits of the Aether Physics Model that it precisely defines dimensions and units, which is something the Standard Model and String Theory fails at. And we also provide the logic and evidence to support our position. This is a very important point; our foundation is not made up with arbitrary assumptions. Our physics foundation is constructed from a clear analysis of the data.</p>
<p>What we did, by combining a quantum-scale mathematical framework and a quantum-scale Aether, is to finish the work that string theorists started, by creating a <a href="http://www.16pi2.com/apm_predictions.htm">comprehensive and testable</a> Aether Physics Model. They were so close, but by trying to stay within the Standard Model system, they could not break out into the truly revolutionary discovery that we bring. By quantifying the Aether from the empirical data, we have succeeded where Albert Einstein failed. We have successfully unified all the forces. This theory of a quantum scale Aether (equal to 16pi2 times Coulomb’s constant) is the key to unlocking the universal laws.</p>
<p>Modified by Jack L. Doan by moving the image from here to the front of this post. Otherwise the J_Electron Spin will be the same around J_Waves as <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-09/qai-pio090206.php" target="new">international scientific conference</a> image in front of this post shows.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">&#8220;David Thomson and I had independently arrived at the same conclusions (the structure of first generation particles as toroidal geometry with 2 opposing streams and a simple explanation of the forces and of the photon). I had created a Planck-scale Aether model, and Dave had created an integrated mathematical model. We then joined our research, resources, and talents and created a comprehensive and testable &#8220;Thomson-Bourassa Theory of Everything&#8221;.</span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;"> </span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">The precisely measured values characterizing the Standard Model are for the most part unchanged in the Aether Physics Model The Aether Physics Model offers new insights into the mechanics and electromagnetics of the subatomic realm.</span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">A central concept of the Aether Physics Model is the Aether surrounding physical matter is active and dynamic, contributing to the maintenance of subatomic particle angular momentum. This dynamic aspect of Aether is mathematically represented through Coulomb&#8217;s Constant and the gravitational constant. The quantum Aether unit is a unit of rotating magnetic field. Coulomb&#8217;s</span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;"> constant is shown to be composed of the speed of light, permeability, permittivity and conductance. The constant of Aether conductance was previously missed by physicists during the past 150 years but is essential for understanding the Unified Force Theory, which the Aether Physics Model produces.</span></p>
<div><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">The Unified Force Theory includes a Unified Charge Theory as it is shown there are two kinds of charge; electrostatic charge and electromagnetic charge. Electromagnetic charge is, in fact, the strong force that binds subatomic particles into atoms. The weak force is shown to be a proportion of electrostatic charge to electromagnetic charge.</span></div>
<p></span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:#222222;font-family:Arial;">Charge itself is shown to always be distributed, as opposed to being a single dimension of charge. There are two significant discoveries related to this observation; 1.) the conductance of space reacts directly with particle angular momentum to produce electromagnetic charge and 2.) a new and more functional system of units has been developed that corrects the single dimension of charge used in units of current, potential, magnetic moment, magnetic flux, etc.</p>
<p>In the Aether Physics Model the quantum realm is shown to be built of quantum measurements. Using quantum measurements for developing a system of units greatly enhances the understanding of the geometry of subatomic particles as the geometrical constants of 4pi and 16pi² regularly appear at the quantum level.</p>
<p>As a result of the Aether Physics Model, the term &#8220;Aether&#8221; is once again brought into the scientific lexicon as space-time (or more accurately, space-resonance) is shown to include mass, charge, geometrical shapes, and is driven by a massive, dynamic Gforce. The Aether is clearly identified and shown to have an active part in maintaining the existence of the physical Universe.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;">Differences between the Aether Physics Model and the Standard Model</span></strong></p>
<p>1. In the Aether Physics Model charge is always represented as a distributed charge (i.e. coul² instead of coul)</p>
<p>2. All subatomic particles are seen just as experiment and mathematics presents them, as primary angular momentum (two-dimensional matter); not as solid particles and not as waves. This eliminates wave/particle duality.</p>
<p>3. The photon in the Aether Physics Model is essentially an outward expanding electron/positron and not a point particle. The outward expansion causes the photon to lose the electrostatic charge but retain its electromagnetic charge. The photon is composed of both matter and antimatter, which are stored in different regions of the quantum Aether unit.</p>
<p>4. In the Aether Physics Model the electron and proton have two types of charge, electrostatic and electromagnetic. The electrostatic charge has a spherical angle and the electromagnetic charge has a steradian angle. The neutron and photon also have electromagnetic charge, but the neutron has a null electrostatic charge and the photon has no electrostatic charge.</p>
<p>5. The structure of the Aether is such that it appears there are two toroids spinning in opposite directions, which contributes to the structure of subatomic particles and atoms. This configuration allows for half-spin electromagnetic charges, which cover 360 degrees of arc. The half-spin, steradian electromagnetic charges of subatomic particles are attracted together according to the strong force law, which is similar to Coulomb&#8217;s electrostatic force law.</p>
<p>6. In the APM the mass and electromagnetic properties of all subatomic particles always have the exact same mass to electromagnetic charge ratio. Even the Aether has the same mass to electromagnetic charge ratio.</p>
<p>7. In the Aether Physics Model, Aether (space-resonance) is seen as an essential component of reality. All physical matter exists within space-resonance and this space-resonance is dynamic, not lifeless or static.</p>
<p>8. The Aether Physics Model has a mathematically correct Unified Force Theory, the Standard Model does not.</p>
<p>9. The APM also acknowledges a conductance constant for free space, the Standard Model does not. This conductance constant is essential to understanding the true nature of the Quantum realm as it is directly responsible for producing electromagnetic charge.</p>
<p>10. The Aether Physics Model explains General Relativity Theory in terms of the electrostatic charge of the Aether and the strong charge of matter.</p>
<p>e² = 8pi * a * e.emax²</p>
<p>This replaces Albert Einstein&#8217;s explanation as the equality between the space-time curvature tensor and the mass-energy tensor:</p>
<p>G = 8pi * T</p>
<p>Not only does the APM explanation explain why light bends around massive objects, but it also explains plasma physics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jack L. Doan copied the front image and &#8221; Aether Physics Model and superstring theory&#8221; except the 5th paragraph insert, Modified, the rest of this post up to here in quotation marks are not mine.</p>
<p>The next weblog J_Wave 4 Dimensional 137 small to 1 J_Electron; J_Cosmic String Theory of Everything Page continues the research of this concept of Aether compared to mine.</p>
<p>1-2-11 check for update posibility that apears to be OK.</p>
<p></span></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/112/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=112&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_elctrnspnjpg.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">j_elctrnspnjpg.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>J_Electron 4 Dimensional Wave created from J_Photon Waves 137</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/j_electron-4-dimensional-wave-created-from-j_photon-waves-137/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/j_electron-4-dimensional-wave-created-from-j_photon-waves-137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/j_electron-4-dimensional-wave-created-from-j_photon-waves-137/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diagram of  J_Electron that was created from a multiple of  137 J_Gamma ray_Photons in J_Atom&#8217;s inner orbit at Bohr Radius (1/2 the Compton radius) 0.1409340 E-12 cm. The number values in this paragraph are from &#8220;New Physics 2000&#8242;&#8221; inductive Analysis-Fact Sheet  Copyright 2000 Stanley Fay White. This  diagram of J_Electron moving inward from the next [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=111&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_elctrmagntcphtnwvjpg.jpg" title="j_elctrmagntcphtnwvjpg.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_elctrmagntcphtnwvjpg.jpg?w=480" alt="j_elctrmagntcphtnwvjpg.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Diagram of  J_Electron that was created from a multiple of  137 J_Gamma ray_Photons in J_Atom&#8217;s inner orbit at Bohr Radius (1/2 the Compton radius) 0.1409340 E-12 cm. The number values in this paragraph are from &#8220;New Physics 2000&#8242;&#8221; inductive Analysis-Fact Sheet  Copyright 2000 Stanley Fay White. This  diagram of J_Electron moving inward from the next higher orbit to the inner orbit where it will have a wave length  (BohrI c/137) at less than highest orbital speed (c/137) . This diagram of J_Electron radiating J_Photons in multiples of 137 as it moves inward from the J_Electrons 2nd orbit to this 1st atomic orbit. The spin of  J_Electron is clockwise like the right had rule which lined uo in a plane produces a magnetic field. The elementary charge of J_Electron 0.16023875E-18 Coulomb. The density of J_Electron 0.1549E+26 gm/cc. The pulsed electric feild frequency of J_Electron 0.12355902E+21 Hz.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/111/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=111&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/j_electron-4-dimensional-wave-created-from-j_photon-waves-137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_elctrmagntcphtnwvjpg.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">j_elctrmagntcphtnwvjpg.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mathematica New Physical Constancy&#8217;s JLD Edit</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/mathematica-new-physical-constancys-jld-edit/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/mathematica-new-physical-constancys-jld-edit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/mathematica-new-physical-constancys-jld-edit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entries that extend to the right above are my edited input to be used in J_TOE.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=108&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-107" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/mathematica-new-physical-constancys-jld-edit/107/" title="mathamatica-new-constants-jld-edit.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/mathamatica-new-constants-jld-edit.jpg?w=480" alt="mathamatica-new-constants-jld-edit.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The entries that extend to the right above are my edited input to be used in J_TOE.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/108/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=108&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/mathematica-new-physical-constancys-jld-edit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/mathamatica-new-constants-jld-edit.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mathamatica-new-constants-jld-edit.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>J_Wv (JLDoan Electron_Photon Four Dimensional Gamma Wave)</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-gamma-wave/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-gamma-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 05:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-gamma-wave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[name         J. Alfredo G. status       educator age          40s Question -   By using de Broglie&#8217;s equation one find that lambda=3.35A for the electron in the hydrogen atom (speed of electron = 2.187 E6 m/s, according to Bohr&#8217;s atom model).  How can this wave exists in a space of only 0.529A (Bohr radius)? &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Your numbers explain [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=105&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-104" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-gamma-wave/104/" title="j_wvgamma-wave-tcw-qp-corel-photo.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_wvgamma-wave-tcw-qp-corel-photo.jpg?w=480" alt="j_wvgamma-wave-tcw-qp-corel-photo.jpg" /></a>name         J. Alfredo G.<br />
status       educator<br />
age          40s</p>
<p>Question -   By using de Broglie&#8217;s equation one find that lambda=3.35A<br />
for the electron in the hydrogen atom (speed of electron = 2.187 E6 m/s,<br />
according to Bohr&#8217;s atom model).  How can this wave exists in a space of<br />
only 0.529A (Bohr radius)?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Your numbers explain it!  According to Bohr, for a stable orbit, exactly one<br />
wavelength must fit on the path of the orbit.  And sure enough!<br />
2 * pi * 0.529 = 3.32A, awfully close to 3.35A. I suspect a more careful<br />
calculation would produce perfect agreement.</p>
<p>Your question, though, is a very good one, since the electron in the lowest<br />
Bohr orbit is not really a tiny planet circling a sun-like proton.<br />
Nonetheless (luckily for the progress of physics), this simple model works<br />
beautifully, which has always amazed me (and many others.)</p>
<p>Best, Dick Plano, Professor of Physics emeritus, Rutgers University<br />
====================================================<br />
The circumference corresponding with the Borh radius is 3.32A, so this<br />
does not<br />
seem inconsistent to me, given the approximate nature of the model.</p>
<p>Tim Mooney<br />
====================================================<br />
The &#8220;wave&#8221; follows the orbit in the Bohr model.  The path length for the<br />
orbit = 2 * Pi * Bohr radius.</p>
<p>Greg Bradburn<br />
=====================================================</p>
<p>The first line of this copy of J_Wv(Gamma Wave) R  is the Bohr Radius m.  See my #2 BASIC notebook page 33. The J_Ratio divisor 1.616 10^33 cm should have been 1.616 10^-35 m for Planck Length giving a J_Ratio = 2.088619146 10^23 . Also the 3rd line from the bottom G value is from page 353 of this notebook page 787 APPENDIX.  The first constant used is  137 rounded off from : 137.03599911 IFS (Inverse Fine Structure Constant) 1/Joule Second Ampere / Volt(Coulomb^2) from Mathamatica 5 New Physical Constance * DERIVED CONSTANTS FROM RELATIONSHIPS *. Therefor the units of the FSC are Joule Second Ampere / Volt (Coulomb^2).</p>
<p>The 2nd curve of the area of the upper half profile is using 0.5 J_Wv(Gamma Wave Length / 2 ) therefor 1/4  of the 2.4614 10^12 in the &#8211; to + interrogation.</p>
<p>These number values are approximate and meant to be used only for the range of J_Wvs.</p>
<p>The New Physic Constants in the next published jackbe Weblog will be used to check the information above  &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; J. Alferdo G. Question&#8211;.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/105/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=105&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-gamma-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/j_wvgamma-wave-tcw-qp-corel-photo.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">j_wvgamma-wave-tcw-qp-corel-photo.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Part Chapter 2 Formulating the Universe Mathamatica 5</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chapter 2  ( modifications have been made at        { # [digit]inserts}) &#38; Blue Digits are after # 10 insert (27) through (44) in between some of the topic reference&#8217;s of the Text &#8220;Formulating the Universe&#8221;. The Black Digits (1) through (26) are the same except they are before # 3 insert.  &#8220;ETHER OR RELATIVITY Intimately involved in the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=93&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left"><a rel="attachment wp-att-96" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="2-3mm.jpg"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-97" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="2-4mm.jpg"></a><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-5mm.jpg" title="2-5mm.jpg"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-100" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="2-7mm.jpg"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-101" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="2-9mm.jpg"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-102" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="2-10mm.jpg"></a>Chapter 2  ( modifications have been made at        { # [digit]inserts}) &amp; Blue Digits are after # 10 insert (27) through (44) in between some of the topic reference&#8217;s of the Text &#8220;Formulating the Universe&#8221;. The Black Digits (1) through (26) are the same except they are before # 3 insert. </p>
<p align="left">&#8220;ETHER OR RELATIVITY</p>
<p align="left">Intimately involved in the particle-wave riddle in the nature of light mystery is the question of whether or not there is a luminiferous ether (or aether), or light wave medium. If light is a particle, there would not need to be a light wave medium. The particles of light, once emitted, would travel in free space unimpeded until they struck some obstacle or object and were absorbed or reflected. On the other hand, if light is a wave, it would only stand to reason that light is a wave of some medium, just as waves on the sea are water waves, and sound is waves of atoms, whether gaseous, liquid, or solid. Is there, or is there not, a medium for light waves?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">#3    #1         #2       #5             #4 </p>
<p align="left">|     |           |        |              |</p>
<p align="left"><a rel="attachment wp-att-95" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="2-2mm.jpg"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-94" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5//" title="mm-inferometer.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/mm-inferometer.jpg?w=480" alt="mm-inferometer.jpg" /></a></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Fig. 2-1. The Michelson-Morley interferometer was mounted on a large stone, floating on Mercury. It was designed so that it could be rotated on the base and aligned with different angle markings.&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 1              Fig. 2-1 moved here from  below    <a href="//s1c2f2mimoinfrrmtr.gif/">\\s1c2f2MiMoInfrrmtr.gif</a> right after insert # 5</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;The centuries-long wave-particle controversy (which we studied in the last chapter) was, at the same time a debate over whether there is or is not an ether, or light wave medium. For the most part, whenever there was a belief that light is a wave, the n there was a belief in a light wave medium, or ether. And, for the most part, whenever there was a belief that light is a particle, then there was a getting away from the concept of an ether of space.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">A. Wave-Ether Concept</p>
<p align="left">Both the particle and wave concepts go back to ancient times, yet the wave-ether concept appears to have been more highly developed in ancient times than the particle theory. The word &#8220;aether&#8221; itself is an ancient word&#8211;a Latinization of the Greek root , &#8220;which means upper air or sky and relates to the refined fire of the empyrean. (1) From Empedocles and Aristotle through Descartes and Newton to Maxwell and Lodge, the age-old concept of a plenum or an aether has given one solution to the hoary philosophical problem of action-at-a-distance, across seemingly empty space. (2)</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">In its long history, the aether has had a number of different tasks assigned to it, such ascriptions occasionally leading scientists to perhaps multiply aethers beyond necessity. (3) But the purest goal of ether theory has been to find a single ether which can account for all known forces at a distance.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">It [the ether] must be a medium which can be effective for transmitting all the types of physical action known to us; it would be worse than no solution to have one medium to transmit gravitation, another to transmit electric effects, another to transmit light and so on. Thus the attempt to find out a constitution for the aether will involve a synthesis of intimate correlation of the various types of physical agencies, which appear so different to us mainly because we perceive them through different senses. (4)</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">It should also be noted . . . that such a &#8220;unified field theory&#8221; would have been a mechanical theory, thus accomplishing a complete unification of physics that has often been an inspiration and goal to physicists from Oersted and Faraday to Einstein and Wheeler. (5)</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">There have been many and varied ether theories by Descartes, (6) Huygens, (7) Newton, (8, 9) Young, (10) Fresnel, (11) Stokes, Cauchy, Green, MacCullagh, Fitzgerald, Larmor, (12) and Maxwell. (13, 14, 15)</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">B. Corpuscular Theory</p>
<p align="left">At first Newton had ether theories for the transmission of heat through a vacuum (16) and &#8220;as a background for absolute mechanical motion in the Universe.&#8221; (17) Later Newton had less and less place for an ether in his system of physics, until in 1717 &#8220;he equated the Aether with the Vacuum and rested content with a corpuscular theory of light.&#8221; (18) Newton&#8217;s growing authority in physics &#8220;brought hard days on the proponents of the wave theory of light during the eighteenth century, and accordingly on the development and acceptance of aether theories in which the aether functioned as the light medium.&#8221; (19)</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">Due to the influence of Newton and others, the ether theory was almost entirely rejected in the eighteenth century. But it was to come back again in the nineteenth century. &#8220;It is a common practice so far as optics is concerned to call the seventeenth century an era of plenitude in nature, the eighteenth century an era of the corpuscularian theory of light, and the nineteenth century an era dominated by the undulatory or wave theory of light.&#8221; (20) We recognize this progression of thought as a scientific opinion oscillation from, away from, and back to an ether theory.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">C. Wave-Ether Theory</p>
<p align="left">Thomas Young brought back the wave-ether theory of light. (21) Young was the one who resolved the wave model problem with light polarization by suggesting that light may be a transverse wave instead of a longitudinal wave like sound. Fresnel seized upon the transverse wave concept and worked out essentially a &#8220;kinematical&#8221; theory of wave motion. Fresnel believed that the ether, while being molecular with forces acting between the particles, acted like an elastic solid. This theory, called the &#8220;elastic solid theory,&#8221; assumes that the ethereal medium is so constituted as to permit transverse waves to be propagated through it, but not longitudinal waves. (22)</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">There was one more major adjustment to optical ether theories before ether theories came on hard times again. Breakthroughs in electricity and magnetism led to the concept of an electrical ether in space which could support electrostatic and electromagnetic wave-fronts propagating at the speed of light. This theoretical discovery was made by James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879), Scotch physicist, through the insight gained by his remarkable synthesis of knowledge on electric and magnetic effects into a concise set of elegant formulas, which have since been named in his honor. His equations showed that electromagnetic waves ought to exist in empty space, and that they ought to travel with the speed of light. With this added insight, scientists concluded t hat light was indeed an electromagnetic wave of the appropriate frequency, and that therefore the luminiferous ether was somehow electromagnetic in character. Some final contributions to the electrical ether theory put forth the view that electrostatic effects in space are due to polarization of the ether, while magnetic effects are due to the velocity of the ether.</p>
<p align="left">Since Maxwell&#8217;s equations showed that electromagnetic waves ought to exist in empty space (that is, space devoid of atoms and molecules), some scientists consider that Maxwell began the trend toward the belief that an ether is not necessary. But Maxwell did not so regard the matter. He believed firmly in an electrical ether. Maxwell&#8217;s equations contained terms for &#8220;displacement currents&#8221; and &#8220;electric displacements&#8221; in a vacuum as well as in solids. (23, 24) These he interpreted in terms of his theory of &#8220;aether strains.&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">D. Ether Experiment</p>
<p align="left">The more concrete concepts of the nature of the luminiferous ether that resulted from Maxwell&#8217;s work, together with the realization that electromagnetic waves ought to exist in free space, set the stage for an experimental attempt to detect the ether and measure its velocity relative to the earth. Such an experiment was conducted by Michelson (1881) and by Michelson and Morley (1887).&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"># 2 (For the insert of J_Ether explanation of why this experiment failed to detect J_Ether or their ether see INSERT # 7 below inserted into this text.)_____________________________________</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Michelson and Morley constructed an elaborate interferometer mounted on a large stone floating in Mercury. (See Figs. 2-1 and 2-2.) Light from a monochromatic light source was made to strike a half-silvered mirror a. Half of the light was reflected from the half-silvered mirror to mirror c. Half of the light was reflected from the half-silvered mirror to mirror b. Light from b passed through the half-silvered mirror a to d, and light from c reflected from half-silvered mirror a to d. (See Fig. 2-2 .) The paths were equal in length. If the system was at rest relative to the ether, the light traveling the two paths should interfere constructively.</p>
<p align="left">Based on the Galilean transformation (see Eqs. 2-1) and Newtonian mechanics, the reasoning of Michelson and Morley was that if the system (and the earth) moved with velocity V with respect to the ether along the sac axis, the time of flight for the light beam along aca would be longer than the time of flight for the light beam along aba. (The mathematical details are in Figs 2-2 through 2-9.) Thus the two beams should be out of phase and should interfere destructively.</p>
<p align="left">The displacement to be expected from the Michelson-Morley apparatus was 0.4 fringe (if the earth were traveling through an ether).</p>
<p align="left">The actual displacement was certainly less than the twentieth part of this, and probably less than the fortieth part. But since the displacement is proportional to the square of the velocity, the relative velocity of the earth and the ether is probably less than one-sixth the earth&#8217;s orbital velocity, and certainly less than one-fourth [See Fig. 2-10]. (25)</p>
<p align="left">The experimental results of Michelson and Morley were contrary to what we would expect, based on the Galilean transformation. The experiments have since been repeated (with variations) with different wavelengths of light, with starlight, with extremely monochromatic light from a modern laser, at high altitudes, under the earth&#8217;s surface, on different continents, and at different seasons, over a period of some 80 years. We can say that the ether drift is zero to a precision which is best expressed by saying that the speeds of light upstream and downstream are equal within the variation of less than 103 cm/sec, or of 1 part in 1000 of the earth&#8217;s orbital velocity about the sun. (26)&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 3 Part of the Michelson-Morley experiment-Wikiedia, The free encyclopedia  is inserted here by me to answer the question:&#8221;Is there, or is there not, a medium for light waves?&#8221;.</p>
<p align="left">________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;Each year, the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Earth" title="Earth">Earth</a> travels a tremendous distance in its orbit around the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Sun" title="Sun">sun</a>, at a speed of around 30 km/second or over 108,000 km per hour. The sun itself is traveling about the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Milky_Way" title="Milky Way">galactic center</a> at even greater speeds, and there are other motions at higher levels of the structure of the universe. Since the Earth is in motion, it was expected that the flow of aether across the Earth should produce a detectable &#8220;aether wind.&#8221; Although it would be possible, in theory, for the Earth&#8217;s motion to match that of the aether at one moment in time, it was not possible for the Earth to remain at rest with respect to the aether at all times, because of the variation in both the direction and the speed of the motion.</p>
<p>At any given point on the Earth&#8217;s surface, the magnitude and direction of the wind would vary with time of day and season. By analyzing the return speed of light in different directions at various different times, it was thought to be possible to measure the motion of the Earth relative to the aether.</p>
<p>The expected difference in the measured speed of light was quite small, given that the velocity of the earth in its orbit around the sun was about one hundredth of one percent of the speed of light. A number of physicists had attempted to make this measurement during the mid-1800s, but the accuracy demanded was simply too great for existing experimental setups. For instance, the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Fizeau%E2%80%93Foucault_apparatus" title="Fizeau–Foucault apparatus">Fizeau–Foucault apparatus</a> could measure the speed of light to perhaps 5% accuracy, not nearly enough to make any sort of aether wind measurement.</p>
<p><a name="The_experiments" title="The_experiments" id="The_experiments"></a></p>
<h2> <span class="mw-headline">The experiments</span></h2>
<p>Michelson had a solution to the problem of how to construct a device sufficiently accurate to detect aether flow. The device he designed, later known as an <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Interferometer" title="Interferometer">interferometer</a>, sent a single source of white light through a <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Beam_splitter" title="Beam splitter">half-silvered mirror</a> that was used to split it into two beams traveling at right angles to one another. After leaving the splitter, the beams traveled out to the ends of long arms where they were reflected back into the middle on small mirrors. They then recombined on the far side of the splitter in an eyepiece, producing a pattern of constructive and destructive <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Interference" title="Interference">interference</a> based on the length of the arms. Any slight change in the amount of time the beams spent in transit would then be observed as a shift in the positions of the interference fringes. If the aether were stationary relative to the sun, then the Earth’s motion would produce a <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Fringe_shift" title="Fringe shift">fringe shift</a> one twenty-fifth the size of a single fringe.</p>
<p>Michelson had made several measurements with an experimental device in 1881, in which he noticed that the expected shift of 0.04 was not seen, and a smaller shift of about 0.02 was. However his apparatus was a prototype, and had experimental errors far too large to say anything about the aether wind. For a measurement of the aether wind, a much more accurate and tightly controlled experiment would have to be carried out. The prototype was, however, successful in demonstrating that the basic method was feasible.</p>
<p style="width:402px;" class="thumbinner"><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Image:Michelson-morley.png" title="Though using a contemporary laser, this Michelson interferometer is the same in principle as those used in the original experiment." class="image"><img border="0" width="400" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Michelson-morley.png/400px-Michelson-morley.png" alt="Though using a contemporary laser, this Michelson interferometer is the same in principle as those used in the original experiment." height="300" class="thumbimage" /></a></p>
<p style="float:right;" class="magnify"><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Image:Michelson-morley.png" title="Enlarge" class="internal"><img width="15" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/skins-1.5/common/images/magnify-clip.png" height="11" /></a></p>
<p>Though using a contemporary laser, this Michelson interferometer is the same in principle as those used in the original experiment.</p>
<p>He then combined efforts with <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Edward_Morley" title="Edward Morley">Edward Morley</a> and spent a considerable amount of time and money creating an improved version with more than enough accuracy to detect the drift. In their experiment, the light was repeatedly reflected back and forth along the arms, increasing the path length to 11 m. At this length, the drift would be about 0.4 fringes. To make that easily detectable, the apparatus was located in a closed room in the basement of a stone building, eliminating most thermal and vibrational effects. Vibrations were further reduced by building the apparatus on top of a huge block of marble, which was then floated in a pool of mercury. They calculated that effects of about 1/100th of a fringe would be detectable.</p>
<p>The mercury pool allowed the device to be turned, so that it could be rotated through the entire range of possible angles to the “aether wind.” Even over a short period of time some sort of effect would be noticed simply by rotating the device, such that one arm rotated into the direction of the wind and the other away. Over longer periods day/night cycles or yearly cycles would also be easily measurable.</p>
<p>During each full rotation of the device, each arm would be parallel to the wind twice (facing into and away from the wind) and perpendicular to the wind twice. This effect would show readings in a <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Sine_wave" title="Sine wave">sine wave</a> formation with two peaks and two troughs. Additionally, if the wind were only from Earth’s orbit around the sun, the wind would fully change directions east/west during a 12 hour period. In this ideal conceptualization, the sine wave of day/night readings would be of opposing <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Phase_%28waves%29" title="Phase (waves)">phase</a>.</p>
<p>Because it was assumed that the motion of the earth around the sun would cause an additional component to the wind, the yearly cycles would be detectable as an alteration of the magnitude of the wind. An example of this effect is a helicopter flying forward. While hovering, a helicopter’s blades would be measured as travelling around typically at 300 mph at the tips. However, if the helicopter is travelling forward at 150 mph, there are points where the tips of the blades are travelling through the air at 150 mph (downwind) and 450 mph (upwind). The same effect would cause the magnitude of an ether wind to decrease and increase on a yearly basis.</p>
<p><a name="The_most_famous_failed_experiment" title="The_most_famous_failed_experiment" id="The_most_famous_failed_experiment"></a></p>
<h2> <span class="mw-headline">The most famous failed experiment</span></h2>
<p style="width:182px;" class="thumbinner"><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Image:Michelson_Interferometer_Red_Laser_Interference.jpg" title="Interference pattern produced with a Michelson Interferometer using a red laser." class="image"><img border="0" width="180" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Michelson_Interferometer_Red_Laser_Interference.jpg/180px-Michelson_Interferometer_Red_Laser_Interference.jpg" alt="Interference pattern produced with a Michelson Interferometer using a red laser." height="159" class="thumbimage" /></a></p>
<p style="float:right;" class="magnify"><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Image:Michelson_Interferometer_Red_Laser_Interference.jpg" title="Enlarge" class="internal"><img width="15" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/skins-1.5/common/images/magnify-clip.png" height="11" /></a></p>
<p>Interference pattern produced with a Michelson Interferometer using a red laser.</p>
<p>After all this thought and preparation, the experiment became what might be called the most famous failed experiment to date. Instead of providing insight into the properties of the aether, Michelson and Morley’s <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf" title="http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf" class="external text">1887 article</a> in the American Journal of Science reported the measurement to be as small as one-fortieth of the expected displacement but “since the displacement is proportional to the square of the velocity” they concluded that the measured velocity was approximately one-sixth of the expected velocity of the Earth’s motion in orbit and “certainly less than one-fourth.” Although this small “velocity” was measured, it was considered far too small to be used as evidence of aether, and it was later said to be within the range of an experimental error that would allow the speed to actually be zero.</p>
<p>Although Michelson and Morley went on to different experiments after their first publication in 1887, both remained active in the field. Other versions of the experiment were carried out with increasing sophistication. Kennedy and Illingworth both modified the mirrors to include a half-wave “step,” eliminating the possibility of some sort of standing wave pattern within the apparatus. Illingworth could detect changes on the order of 1/300th of a fringe, Kennedy up to 1/1500th. Miller later built a non-magnetic device to eliminate <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Magnetostriction" title="Magnetostriction">magnetostriction</a>, while Michelson built one of non-expanding <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Invar" title="Invar">invar</a> to eliminate any remaining thermal effects. Others from around the world increased accuracy, eliminated possible side effects, or both.</p>
<p>Morley was not convinced of his own results, and went on to conduct additional experiments with <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Dayton_Miller" title="Dayton Miller">Dayton Miller</a>. Miller worked on increasingly large experiments, culminating in one with a 32 m (effective) arm length at an installation at the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Mount_Wilson_observatory" title="Mount Wilson observatory">Mount Wilson observatory</a>. To avoid the possibility of the aether wind being blocked by solid walls, he used a special shed with thin walls, mainly of canvas. He consistently measured a small positive effect that varied with each rotation of the device, the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Sidereal_day" title="Sidereal day">sidereal day</a> and on a yearly basis. His measurements amounted to only ~10 km/s instead of the ~30 km/s expected from the earth&#8217;s orbital motion alone. He remained convinced this was due to <em>partial</em> entrainment, though he did not attempt a detailed explanation.</p>
<p>Though Kennedy later also carried out an experiment at Mount Wilson, finding 1/10 the drift measured by Miller, and no seasonal effects, Miller’s findings were considered important at the time, and were discussed by Michelson, <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Hendrik_Lorentz" title="Hendrik Lorentz">Lorentz</a> and others at a meeting reported in 1928 (ref below). There was general agreement that more experimentation was needed to check Miller’s results. Lorentz recognised that the results, whatever their cause, did not quite tally with either his or Einstein’s versions of <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Special_relativity" title="Special relativity">special relativity</a>. Einstein was not present at the meeting and felt the results could be dismissed as <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Experimental_error" title="Experimental error">experimental error</a> (see Shankland ref below). To date, no one has been able to replicate Miller&#8217;s results, and modern experiments have accuracies that rule them out.</p>
<p align="left">
<table border="2" cellPadding="4" cellSpacing="0" style="font-size:95%;background:#f9f9f9;border-collapse:collapse;border:#aaa 1px solid;margin:1em 1em 1em 0;">
<tr>
<th width="150">Name</th>
<th width="80">Year</th>
<th width="80">Arm length (meters)</th>
<th width="80">Fringe shift expected</th>
<th width="80">Fringe shift measured</th>
<th width="80">Experimental Resolution</th>
<th width="80">Upper Limit on V<sub>aether</sub></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michelson</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1881" title="1881">1881</a></td>
<td>1.2</td>
<td>0.04</td>
<td>0.02</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michelson and Morley</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1887" title="1887">1887</a></td>
<td>11.0</td>
<td>0.4</td>
<td>&lt; 0.01</td>
<td></td>
<td>8 km/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Morley and Miller</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1902" title="1902">1902</a>–<a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1904" title="1904">1904</a></td>
<td>32.2</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.015</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Miller</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1921" title="1921">1921</a></td>
<td>32.0</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>0.08</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Miller</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1923" title="1923">1923</a>–<a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1924" title="1924">1924</a></td>
<td>32.0</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>0.03</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Miller (Sunlight)</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1924" title="1924">1924</a></td>
<td>32.0</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>0.014</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tomascheck (Starlight)</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1924" title="1924">1924</a></td>
<td>8.6</td>
<td>0.3</td>
<td>0.02</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Miller</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1925" title="1925">1925</a>–<a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1926" title="1926">1926</a></td>
<td>32.0</td>
<td>1.12</td>
<td>0.088</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kennedy (<a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Mount_Wilson_Observatory" title="Mount Wilson Observatory">Mt Wilson</a>)</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1926" title="1926">1926</a></td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td>0.07</td>
<td>0.002</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Illingworth</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1927" title="1927">1927</a></td>
<td>2.0</td>
<td>0.07</td>
<td>0.0002</td>
<td>0.0006</td>
<td>1 km/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Piccard and Stahel (<a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Rigi" title="Rigi">Rigi</a>)</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1927" title="1927">1927</a></td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>0.13</td>
<td>0.006</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michelson et al.</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1929" title="1929">1929</a></td>
<td>25.9</td>
<td>0.9</td>
<td>0.01</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joos</td>
<td><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1930" title="1930">1930</a></td>
<td>21.0</td>
<td>0.75</td>
<td>0.002</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>In recent times versions of the Michelson–Morley experiment have become commonplace. <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Laser" title="Laser">Lasers</a> and <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Maser" title="Maser">masers</a> amplify light by repeatedly bouncing it back and forth inside a carefully tuned cavity, thereby inducing high-energy atoms in the cavity to give off more light. The result is an effective path length of kilometers. Better yet, the light emitted in one cavity can be used to start the same cascade in another set at right angles, thereby creating an interferometer of extreme accuracy.</p>
<p>The first such experiment was led by <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Charles_H._Townes" title="Charles H. Townes">Charles H. Townes</a>, one of the co-creators of the first <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Maser" title="Maser">maser</a>. Their 1958 experiment put an upper limit on drift, including any possible experimental errors, of only 30 m/s. In 1974 a repeat with accurate lasers in the triangular Trimmer experiment reduced this to 0.025 m/s, and included tests of entrainment by placing one leg in glass. In 1979 the Brillet-Hall experiment put an upper limit of 30 m/s for any one direction, but reduced this to only 0.000001 m/s for a two-direction case (i.e., still or partially entrained aether). A year long repeat known as Hils and Hall, published in 1990, reduced the limit of anisotropy to 2&#215;10<sup>-13</sup>.</p>
<p><a name="Fallout" title="Fallout" id="Fallout"></a></p>
<h2><span class="mw-headline">Fallout</span></h2>
<p>This result was rather astounding and not explainable by the then-current theory of wave propagation in a static aether. Several explanations were attempted, among them that the experiment had a hidden flaw (apparently Michelson’s initial belief), or that the Earth’s gravitational field somehow “dragged” the aether around with it in such a way as would locally eliminate its effect. Miller would have argued that, in most if not all experiments other than his own, there was little possibility of detecting an aether wind since it was almost completely blocked out by the laboratory walls or by the apparatus itself. Be this as it may, the idea of a simple aether, what became known as the <em><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/w/index.php?title=First_Postulate&amp;action=edit" title="First Postulate" class="new">First Postulate</a></em>, had been dealt a serious blow.</p>
<p>A number of experiments were carried out to investigate the concept of aether dragging, or <em>entrainment</em>. The most convincing was carried out by Hamar, who placed one arm of the interferometer between two huge lead blocks. If aether were dragged by mass, the blocks would, it was theorised, have been enough to cause a visible effect. Once again, no effect was seen.</p>
<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Walter_Ritz" title="Walter Ritz">Walter Ritz</a>’s <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Emission_theory" title="Emission theory">emitter theory</a> (or ballistic theory), was also consistent with the results of the experiment, not requiring aether, more intuitive and paradox-free. This became known as the <em>Second Postulate</em>. However it also led to several “obvious” optical effects that were not seen in astronomical photographs, notably in observations of binary stars in which the light from the two stars could be measured in an interferometer. If the Second Postulate was correct, the light from the stars should cause fringe shifting due to the velocity of the stars being added to the speed of the light, but again, no such effect could be seen.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Sagnac_effect" title="Sagnac effect">Sagnac experiment</a> placed a modified apparatus on a constantly rotating turntable; the main modification is that the light trajectory encloses an area. In doing so any ballistic theories such as Ritz’s could be tested directly, as the light going one way around the device would have different length to travel than light going the other way (the eyepiece and mirrors would be moving toward/away from the light). In Ritz’s theory there would be no shift, because the net velocity between the light source and detector was zero (they were both mounted on the turntable). However in this case an effect <em>was</em> seen, thereby eliminating any simple ballistic theory. This fringe-shift effect is used today in <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Laser_gyroscope" title="Laser gyroscope">laser gyroscopes</a>.</p>
<p>A possible explanation was found in the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Lorentz%E2%80%93FitzGerald_contraction_hypothesis" title="Lorentz–FitzGerald contraction hypothesis">Fitzgerald–Lorentz contraction</a>, also simply called <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Length_contraction" title="Length contraction">length contraction</a>. According to this hypothesis all objects physically contract along the line of motion (originally thought to be relative to the aether), so while the light may indeed transit slower on that arm, it also ends up travelling a shorter distance that exactly cancels out the drift. In <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/1932" title="1932">1932</a> the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Kennedy%E2%80%93Thorndike_experiment" title="Kennedy–Thorndike experiment">Kennedy–Thorndike experiment</a> modified the Michelson–Morley experiment by making the path lengths of the split beam unequal, with one arm being very short. In this version a change of the velocity of the earth would still result in a fringe shift except if also the predicted <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Time_dilation" title="Time dilation">time dilation</a> is correct. Once again, no effect was seen, which they presented as evidence for both length contraction and time dilation, both key effects of relativity.</p>
<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Ernst_Mach" title="Ernst Mach">Ernst Mach</a> was among the first physicists to suggest that the experiment actually amounted to a disproof of the aether theory. <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Albert_Einstein" title="Albert Einstein">Einstein</a> derived the Fitzgerald–Lorentz contraction from the relativity postulate; thus his description of <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Special_relativity" title="Special relativity">special relativity</a> was also consistent with the apparently null results of most experiments (though not, as was recognised at the 1928 meeting, with Miller’s observed seasonal effects). Today special relativity is generally considered the “solution” to the Michelson–Morley null result. However, this was not universally recognized at the time. As late as 1920, Einstein himself still spoke of a type of ether that was not a “ponderable medium” but something of significance nonetheless:</p>
<dl>
<dd>
<dl>
<dd><em>“&#8230;More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny ether. We may assume the existence of an ether&#8230; Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether&#8230; According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.”</em> </dd>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>The <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Trouton%E2%80%93Noble_experiment" title="Trouton–Noble experiment">Trouton–Noble experiment</a> is regarded as the electrostatic equivalent of the Michelson-Morley optical experiment, though whether or not it can ever be done with the necessary sensitivity is debatable. On the other hand, the 1908 <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Trouton%E2%80%93Rankine_experiment" title="Trouton–Rankine experiment">Trouton–Rankine experiment</a>, which can be regarded as the electrical equivalent to the <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Kennedy%E2%80%93Thorndike_experiment" title="Kennedy–Thorndike experiment">Kennedy–Thorndike experiment</a>, achieved an incredible sensitivity.</p>
<p><a name="Application_to_gravitational_wave_detection" title="Application_to_gravitational_wave_detection" id="Application_to_gravitational_wave_detection"></a></p>
<h2> <span class="mw-headline">Application to gravitational wave detection</span></h2>
<p>Amongst the predictions of Einstein’s later <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/General_relativity" title="General relativity">general theory of relativity</a> is that there exist <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Gravitational_radiation" title="Gravitational radiation">gravitational waves</a>, but as of 2006, these waves have only been <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity#Strong_field_tests" title="Tests of general relativity">indirectly observed</a>. Enormously sensitive, kilometer-scale <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Michelson_interferometer" title="Michelson interferometer">Michelson interferometers</a> (coupled with <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Fabry-Perot_interferometer" title="Fabry-Perot interferometer">Fabry-Perot interferometers</a>) are used in current projects attempting to directly detect gravitational waves, such as <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/LIGO" title="LIGO">LIGO</a> and <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/VIRGO_%28physics%29" title="VIRGO (physics)">VIRGO</a>. <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/LISA_%28astronomy%29" title="LISA (astronomy)">LISA</a> is a planned joint <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/NASA" title="NASA">NASA</a>-<a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/ESA" title="ESA">ESA</a> mission to put three 5 million kilometer <a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wiki/Michelson_interferometer" title="Michelson interferometer">Michelson interferometers</a> in space, with the intent of observing significantly lower-frequency gravitational waves than terrestrial predecessors.</p>
<h2> <span class="mw-headline">References</span></h2>
<ol class="references">
<li><strong><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/wp-admin/#_ref-0">^</a></strong> Earl R. Hoover, <em>Cradle of Greatness: National and World Achievements of Ohio’s Western Reserve</em> (Cleveland: Shaker Savings Association, 1977).</li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>A. A. Michelson and E.W. Morley, Philos. Mag. S.5, 24 (151), 449-463 (1887), <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf" title="http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf" class="external autonumber">[1]</a></li>
<li>A. A. Michelson et al., <em>Conference on the Michelson-Morley Experiment</em>, Astrophysical Journal 68, 341 (1928)</li>
<li>Robert S. Shankland et al., <em>New Analysis of the Interferometer Observations of Dayton C. Miller</em>, Reviews of Modern Physics, 27(2):167-178, (1955)</li>
<li>James DeMeo, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm" title="http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm" class="external text"><em>Dayton Miller&#8217;s Ether-Drift Experiments: A Fresh Look</em></a>, (2002)</li>
<li>For gravitational waves: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/hyperspace/mog21.ps.gz" title="http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/hyperspace/mog21.ps.gz" class="external text"><em>PostScript file</em></a> of the newsletter of the Topical Group on Gravitation of the American Physical Society Number 21 Spring 2003; Google.com can be used to extract the text of the document.</li>
<li>Holger Müller, Sven Herrmann, Claus Braxmaier, Stephan Schiller, and Achim Peters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 020401 (2003) “Modern Michelson-Morley Experiment Using Cryogenic Optical Resonators”</li>
<li>Renaud Parentani, International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol. 17, No.20, pg. 2721-2726 “What Did We Learn from Studying Acoustic Black Holes?”</li>
<li>N. Rashevsky, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v18/i5/p369_1" title="http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v18/i5/p369_1" class="external text"><em>Light Emission from a Moving Source in Connection with the Relativity Theory</em></a>, &#8220;&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>______________________________________________________________</p>
<p>TEXT FORMULATING THE UNIVERSE Chapter 2 continues here.<font face="Courier"> </font></p>
<p align="left"># 4 The first image in this Weblog post was moved there from here in this text book formulating the Universe unknown auther by me and the Part of the Michelson-Morley experiment-Wikiedia, The free encyclopedia  is inserted befor here where the first image Fig. 2-1 was.</p>
<p></font></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><font face="Courier"># 5 A:\\s1c2f2MiMoInfrrmtr.gif Referring to # 1 Fig 2-1 &amp; Fig. 2-2 a new and unique way J_Ethr can be detected is by putting 4 satellites in sink with moon orbit :#4 S the source columator in the one at the right side Fig 2-1 left side Fig 2-2; #2 the half silvered mirror beam spliters at mid  position) and #3 left side Fig.2-1 right side Fig. 2-2[ c  regular adjustable reflector mirror position] with { b another adjustable reflector mirror on the moon} all aligned to focus #5 d to f in closest to earth sink with the moon sattilite telescope #1 position with diagnol glass speed of light adjuster between f and d.</font></strong></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;</p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-2mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-2mm.jpg" /></p>
<p></font><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Fig. 2-2. The Michelson-Morley experimental interferometer consists of light source s, half-silvered mirror a, mirrors b and c, and telescope detector d; f represents focus of telescope. If interferometer is at rest in ether, an interference pa ttern between beams aba and aca . . . # 5a In J_Ethr which the new and unique J_Intrfrmtr can never considered as at rest the speed of light is the same in all directions in J_Ethr but can be slowed in J_Ether + glass or other substance the referance here as if being at rest in the diagram will be adjusted for.</p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-3mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-3mm.jpg" /></p>
<p></font></strong><strong><font face="Courier">Fig. 2-3. . . . is observed at d. If apparatus (and earth) have velocity V with respect to hypothetical ether, we would expect interference pattern to change at d, since the times to traverse aba, aca would now change by different amounts. To see this . . .            # 5b The change caused by the earth moving with the tree satellites in L5 orbit and the moon part of this new and unique J_Intrfrmtr of the white light fringes will be very slight be cause much of the J_Ethr that is trying to be detected is moving with this part of the solar system involved with J_Intrfrmtr so only 1 / d^2 with d being at least the average distance to Poluto planet will be posible to be concidered at rest.</font></strong><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-4mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-4mm.jpg" /></p>
<p></font></strong><font size="2" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p></font><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Fig. 2-4. . . . consider a Galilean frame S&#8217; moving with earth and interferometer. S is a Galilean frame at rest in ether. The speed of light ( c ) &#8211; V / d^2 will give very little change from the speed of light but an ammount detectible in the fractional change in position of an white light fring with the source of this light being the sun concidered as a point soorce through the collumator lense in L5 orbit for the beam to be compared .&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Courier">Fig.2-5 ??</font></p>
<p></font></strong><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;</p>
<p></font></strong><font size="2" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-6mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-6mm.jpg" /></p>
<p></font><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Fig. 2-6.Thus the time to go from a to c&#8217; and back to a&#8217; is</p>
<p></font><font face="Mathematica1Mono">L</font><font face="Courier">t(ac&#8217;a') = (ac&#8217;)/c-V+(ac&#8217;)/c+V / d^2</font><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Courier"><strong><font face="Mathematica1Mono">L</font><font face="Courier">t (a c&#8217; a&#8217;) = (a c&#8217;) / c-V + (ac&#8217;) /c + V/d^2</font></strong></font></p>
<p></font></strong><font face="Courier"><strong>where (ac&#8217;) denotes the distance between a and c&#8217;.</strong></font><font face="Courier"></font><font face="Courier"><strong></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-7mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-7mm.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong><font face="Courier">Fig. 2-7. What is the time </font><font face="Mathematica1Mono">d</font><font face="Courier">t(ab&#8217;a) = 2t&#8217; to go from a to b and back to a? In the Galilean frame S at rest in ether,&#8221;    </font></strong></p>
<p></strong></font><strong><font face="Courier"># 6 The interferometer has velocity V / d^2 to right; light has speed c. This modifacation to Michelson &amp; Morly experiment for J_Intrfrmtr detecting J_Ethr at a much larger scale expecting a much lower change in reference to ( c ) to be indicated by solar white light fringe change in position to that which would be computed for this new and unique J_Intrfrmtr if was considerad to be at rest with all other components of this system including J_Ethr. </font></strong><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left"># 7 The reason that Michelson and Morley experiment didn&#8217;t detect J_Ether or their ether was that J_Ether or their ether is that the speed of light is the is the same ( c ) for a system made up of atoms and their associated J_Ether as well as another similuar system of atoms and their associated J_Ether in its position in the socalled vacuume even though the two systems J_Ether &amp; J_Graviphotons mutualy overlap forming the medium through which gravity and Electromagnetic radiation as well as other forces are propagated. This means that the J_Ether system associated with the Michelson and Morley experiment would be unable to detect the J_Ether. This insert is applicable to this entire text chapters 1 through 7.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;T = t (a b&#8217; a)</p>
<p align="left">a^2 tb</p>
<p><strong></p>
<p align="left">Fig. 2-8.</p>
<p>I^2 = ((V/d^2)^2/c^2) I^2 + (a b)^2 therefor I = (ab)/ (I-(V/d^2)^2/c^2)^1/2, <font face="Mathematica1Mono">L</font><font face="Courier">t (aba&#8217;) = 2t&#8217; = 2(ab)(c^2-(V/d^2)^2)^1/2</font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">I^2 = ((v/d^2)^2/c^2) I^2 + (a b)^2</p>
<p></font></strong></font></strong><font face="Courier">a^2 b^2 -V^2 / c^2  therefor</font><font face="Courier"></font><font face="Courier"><strong></p>
<p align="left">I = (a b)/(I-(V/d^2)^2/c^2)^.5</p>
<p></strong></font><font face="Courier"><strong><font face="Mathematica1Mono">L</font><font face="Courier">t (a b a&#8217;) 2 t&#8217;</font></strong><strong><font face="Courier"> </font></strong></font><font face="Courier"></font><font face="Courier"><strong></strong></font><font face="Courier"><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left"><strong>2 t&#8217; = 2 (a b) (c^2 &#8211; (V/d^2)^2)^.5</strong></p>
<p></font></strong></font></p>
<p align="left"><font face="Courier"><strong>Thus even if (ab) = (ac), the Galilean transformation leads us to expect a . . .&#8221;</strong></font></p>
<p><font face="Courier"><strong># 8 ( using J_Intrfrmtr V / d^2 to detect J_Ethr )          &#8221;</strong></font><font face="Courier"></font><font face="Courier"><strong></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-9mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-9mm.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong><font face="Courier">Fig. 2-9. . . . shift in the interference pattern if the interferometer changes its velocity with respect to the ether. None was observed.&#8221;</font></strong></p>
<p></strong></font><strong><font face="Courier"># 9 Where Michelson &amp; Morly experiment found a nul results be cause J_Ethr is nearly all effective local system on the earth J_Intrfrmtr will find a fraction of the shift indicated below using the average distance to poluto for d in d^2 term used above.   &#8220;&#8212;-&gt;</font></strong><strong><font face="Courier"> </font></strong><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-10mm.jpg?w=480" alt="2-10mm.jpg" /></p>
<p></font></strong><strong><font face="Courier">Fig. 2-10. Michelson and Morley wrote: &#8220;The results of the observations are expressed graphically [in the figure]. The upper is the curve for the observations at noon, and the lower that for the evening observations. The dotted curves represe nt <em>one-eighth</em> of the theoretical displacements. It seems fair to conclude from the figure that if there is any displacement due to the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous ether, this cannot be much greater than 0.01 of the distance be tween the fringes.&#8221; # 9a The .01 of the distance between fringes may be enough to mathamaticaly prove the eistance of J_Ethr if the scientific methode with new technology was used in conducting a new experiment otherwise like (Michelson and Morley, <em>Am. J. Sci.</em> 34, 333 (1887).) The vertical axis is the displacement of the fringes; the horizontal axis refers to the orientation of the interferometer relative to an east-west line.</font></strong><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">The null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment was nothing short of a major scientific scandal that sent scientists scrambling for a suitable explanation.&#8221; # 9b J_Ethr not a stationary ether would have been a much better conclusion. &#8220;The Michelson-Morley experiment was a continental divide,&#8211;a major watershed&#8211;in the concept s not only of light, but also of space and time and physical dynamics, or mechanics. Scientists abandoned the ether theory of light altogether. But interestingly enough, we see that after this major shock, ether theories are coming back again.</p>
<p align="left">Many attempts were made to explain the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without altogether giving up the idea of an ether: It was suggested that bodies moving through space might drag the ether along locally.&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 10 (The above #7 insert would agree with the proceeding sentence.)___________________________________</p>
<p>&#8220;Another idea was that the v elocity of light adds vectorially to that of the source. But both these ideas were fraught with difficulties. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(27)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">The most serious proposal advanced was that bodies which move through the ether suffer a change of shape just sufficient to make the speed of light <em>appear</em> to be the same in various directions. The change that is needed is a contraction in the d irection of motion of the body, such that a body of length L<sup>o</sup> at rest is shrunk to a length L<sup>o</sup>(1 &#8211; V²/c²)<sub>1/2</sub> when in motion at speed V parallel to its length. This effect, called the Lorentz-FitzGerald contracti on, was supposed to follow from Maxwell&#8217;s equations; no one was successful in proving that it actually did, however. Furthermore, later experiments <u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(28)</font></u><font face="Courier"> have shown that a simple length contraction is not alone sufficient; a <em>time-dilation</em> effect is also necessary. This would be most difficult for Maxwell&#8217;s equations to provide, but follows naturally from Einstein&#8217;s theory. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(29)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font></p>
<p></font><font size="4" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">E. Relativity</p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Einstein&#8217;s solution to the Michelson-Morley null result riddle stemmed from the principle of relativity.</p>
<p align="left">It has long been accepted that there is no meaning to absolute translational motion through space. This idea is supported by our everyday experience with the laws of mechanics as they apply inside a uniformly moving automobile, train, or airplane; for in such a &#8220;moving&#8221; reference frame these dynamical laws appear the same as in a laboratory &#8220;at rest&#8221; on the earth. One can describe the situation analytically by saying that the laws of motion are <em>covariant</em>&#8211;i.e., they retain the same form&#8211;with r espect to a transformation of coordinates to a uniformly moving system. . . . This property of the laws of mechanics leads naturally to the supposition that the universe may be so constituted that it is impossible by any kind of experiment whatever to de tect absolute motion through space. This hypothesis is called the <em>principle of relativity</em>.</p>
<p align="left">The principle of relativity was an accepted theory of physics for over two centuries. But when Maxwell, in 1865, formulated his dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field, it appeared that absolute motion through space might be detectable by <em>optical means</em>.</p>
<p>. . . It seems quite clear that, if space is not really empty, but filled with a rigid medium, there might be some meaning to absolute motion after all. And it even appears possible that our speed through this medium might be measured by comparing the speed of light in different directions. Such an experiment was carried out by Michelson (1881) and by Michelson and Morley (1887). </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(30)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">The null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment led Einstein to assert again with force the principle of relativity&#8211;the idea that it is impossible by any kind of experiment whatever to detect absolute motion through space. Previous explanations of the principle of relativity had led to the so-called Galilean transformation:</p>
<p align="left">x&#8217; = x &#8211; Vt; y&#8217; = y; z&#8217; = z; t&#8217; = t. (2-1)</p>
<p align="left">This transformation was the basis for Newtonian classical mechanics. The principle of relativity with the added assumption that the speed of light is constant to all observers led Einstein and others to the Lorentz transformation:</p>
<p align="left">x&#8217; = x-Vt/(1-V^2 t^2/c^2)^1/2, Y&#8217; = y z&#8217; = z, t&#8217; = t+(V^2/c^2) x/ (1-V^2/c^2)^1/2 (2-2)&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 10a</p>
<p align="left">x&#8217; = x &#8211; Vt</p>
<p><strong></p>
<p align="left">y&#8217; = y</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>z&#8217; = z</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>t&#8217; = t</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Y&#8217; = y z&#8217;</strong></p>
<p><strong>y z&#8217;&#8221; it apears Mathamatica 5 dosn&#8217;t reconise &#8221; &#8216; &#8220;</strong><strong></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;x&#8217; = x &#8211; Vt/(1-V^2 t^2 /c^2)^.5</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>t&#8217; = t+(v^2 /c^2) x/ (1-V^2/c^2)^.5</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;This transformation is the basis of Einstein&#8217;s Special Theory of Relativity in which there is relative mass increase, time dilations, and length contraction for objects traveling an appreciable velocity compared to the speed of light as seen by a &#8220;stationary&#8221; observer.&#8221;</strong><strong></p>
<p align="left"># 11 (the # 12 through #23 insertions below in this text explains the proceeding sentance.)__________________</p>
<p>&#8220;The Special Theory of Relativity was developed by Einstein in 1905 as a result of his consideration of objects moving relative to one another with constant velocity. &#8220;In 1915 Einstein developed the theory of general relativity in which he considered objects accelerated with respect to one another.&#8221; <u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(31)</font></u><font face="Courier"> The principle that simplified this problem was the principle of equivalence&#8211;the idea &#8220;that forces produced by gravity are in every way equivalent to forces produced by acceleration, so that it is theoretically impossible to distinguish between gravitational and accelerational forces by experiment.&#8221; </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(32)</font></u><font face="Courier"> In Einstein&#8217;s General Theory of Relativity, </font><font face="Courier">Newton&#8217;s hypothesis that every object attracts every other object in direct proportion to its mass is replaced by the relativistic hypothesis that the continuum is curved in the neighborhood of massive objects. Einstein&#8217;s law of gravity states simply that the world lines of every object is a geodesic in the continuum. A geodesic is the shortest distance between two points, but in curved space it is not generally a straight line. In the same way, geodesics on the surface of the earth are great circle s, which are not straight lines on any ordinary map. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(33)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">While more accurate, relativistic mechanics is much more complicated mathematically than the earlier classical mechanics.</p>
<p>The famous apocryphal statement that only ten people in the world understood Einstein&#8217;s theory referred to the complex tensor algebra and Riemannian geometry of general relativity; by comparison, special relativity can be understood by any college stud ent who has studied elementary calculus. <u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(34)</font></u><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Any operation of and experiment with modern elementary particle accelerators is a test of Einstein&#8217;s Special Theory of Relativity. Several classic tests of the General Theory of Relativity have been performed with good results. These will be presente d in detail in Chapter 4.</p>
<p></font></font><font size="4" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">F. Relativity&#8217;s Weakness</p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Einstein&#8217;s etherless theory of relativity has done remarkably well in all areas except one: the twin or clock paradox. A more careful examination of experimental data shows that Einstein&#8217;s etherless relative space model fails in the tests made to cla rify the clock paradox.</p>
<p align="left">In the twin paradox, one of two twins rockets away from earth a distance into space, turns around, then rockets back. To the traveling twin, the stay at home twin appears to make a round trip in the opposite direction. Which one will age more than th e other, or will they age alike? Will each twin claim that the other aged less because of time dilation? Or will there be a difference in the aging?</p>
<p>In one published harmonization of the twin paradox, </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(35)</font></u><font face="Courier"> the twins broadcast their heartbeats to each other during the trip. Using relativistic Doppler-shifting of the frequencies and relativistic calculations, the autho rs conclude that each twin will agree on how many heartbeats the stay at home twin had, and each twin will agree on how many heartbeats the traveling twin had. The traveling twin will have fewer heartbeats because his time was dilated. The authors concl ude: &#8220;There is really no paradox.&#8221; </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(36)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">But of course! In the beginning of the problem, twin B is assumed to have length contraction of his space (in other words, he is moving), while twin A does not (in other words, he is at rest). As long as both twins are agreed on who is moving and who is not, both will be agreed on who will have fewer heartbeats.</p>
<p align="left">But this misses the whole point of the twin paradox. Einstein did not believe there was any way of determining an absolute space in special relativity. He postulated that one uniformly moving reference frame was as good as another. The theory of rel ativity was thought to be consistent no matter what the rest velocity was assumed to be. Therefore twin A should experience length contraction and time dilation as computed by twin B if twin B assumes he is at rest during his flight.</p>
<p>Some physicists try to harmonize the clock paradox through general relativity, as though the accelerations of twin B affect the positions of his clock. But their equations do not show any acceleration effect on the position of the clocks except for th e changing of velocity and correlated changes in clock speeds. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(37)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">The clock paradox can be put in better perspective by studying triplets instead of twins. Let triplet X stay at home on planet earth. Let triplet Y rocket out in space similar to twin B, and let triplet Z rocket out in space in the opposite direction as triplet Y. After a period of coasting, let triplets Y and Z simultaneously decelerate and rocket back to earth for a close-encounter fly by the earth and each other. Let X, Y, and Z compare their clocks. Then Y and Z should continue to coast for aw hile, then simultaneously decelerate and rocket back to earth for another close-encounter and fly by. Let them again compare their clocks. Finally let Y and Z continue coasting for awhile, simultaneously decelerating and accelerating back to planet eart h, where they land and compare their clocks with triplet X.</p>
<p align="left">Which should have slower clocks? X, Y, or Z? Z should expect Y to have time dilation relative to him according to Einstein&#8217;s theory. Also Y should expect Z to have time dilation relative to him. One cannot appeal to the accelerations and general re lativity to harmonize this contradiction, for the accelerations are symmetrical. Triplet X would expect Y and Z to be time dilated equally.</p>
<p></font><font size="4" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">G. Clock Paradox Experiment</p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">The confusion over the clock paradox was so long-lasting that men decided that only experiment could settle the question.</p>
<p>Perhaps the first experiment to resolve this question was performed by Hafele and Keating in their contracircumglobar journey in jet aircraft with portable cesium beam atomic clocks. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(38, 39)</font></u><font face="Courier"> Other experiments were later made in orbiting vehicles. </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Hafele and Keating put portable cesium beam atomic clocks (very precise clocks that can measure nanosecond differences of time intervals lasting days) in commercial jet aircraft on around-the-world flights. One set of clocks was put aboard a westward around-the-world flight. Another set of clocks was put aboard an eastward around-the-world flight. Another set of clocks was kept at home &#8220;at rest&#8221; on planet earth. Hafele and Keating kept careful flight logs as to altitudes, velocities and directions a s a function of time for both flights. From these flight data Hafele and Keating calculated theoretical time differences through special and general relativity. The general relativity time differences were due to different clock altitudes in the earth&#8217;s gravitational field. The special relativity time differences were due to different plane speeds and directions and the earth&#8217;s rotation rate and different latitudes in the flights. The theoretical time differences were compared with measured time diffe rences with good results.</p>
<p align="left">Notice the data below in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. The tables present the predicted and measured time differences between the &#8220;stationary&#8221; earth clock (which actually travels eastward at about 1000 miles per hour due to the rotation of the earth) and the cl ock on the jet flying eastward around the earth and the jet flying westward around the earth. Not the earth clock, but the clock in the jet flying westward ran the fastest, showing that it was more nearly at rest in the universe than the other clocks.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">TABLE 2-1</p>
<p align="left">Predicted relativistic time differences (nsec). *</p>
<p align="left">EffectDirectionEastWestGravitational144 ± 14179 ± 18Kinematic-184 ± 1896 ± 10Net-40 ± 23275 ± 21Predicted relativistic time differences for atomic clocks in Hafele and Keating&#8217;s contracircumglobar journey in jet aircraft.</p>
<p align="left">*J. C. Hafele and Richard E. Keating, &#8220;Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains,&#8221; <em>Science</em>, Vol. 177, July 14, 1972, p. 167.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">TABLE 2-2</p>
<p align="left">Observed relatavistic time differences..**</p>
<p align="left">Clock Serial No.(nsec)Eastward *Westward *120-57277361-74284408-55266447-51266 Mean ± S.D.-59 ± 10273 ± 7 Predicted ± Error Est.-40 ± 23275 ± 21 Observed relativistic time differences for atomic clocks in Hafele and Keating&#8217;s contra circum globar journey in jet aircraft.</p>
<p align="left">*Negative signs indicate that upon return the time indicated on the flying clocks was less than the time indicated on the MEAN(USNO) clock of the U.S. Naval Observatory.</p>
<p align="left">**J. C. Hafele and Richard E. Keating, &#8220;Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Observed Relativistic Time Gains,&#8221; <em>Science</em>, Vol. 177, July 14, 1972, p. 168.</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p></font><font size="4" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">H. Falsification of Principles of Relativity and Equivalence</p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">These tests have been thought to be proofs of Einstein&#8217;s special and general theories of relativity, for the <em>formulas</em> of special and general relativity were once again proven correct. But somehow a couple of important points have been missed. These experiments show that it is possible (though difficult and expensive) to measure absolute velocity in space through atomic clock experiments. (The westward flying clocks were more nearly at rest than the earth because of the earth&#8217;s daily rotation. ) Thus <em>the principle of relativity</em>&#8211;the supposition that the universe may be so constituted that it is impossible by any kind of experiment whatever to detect absolute motion through space&#8211;<em>is false</em>! The principle is almost true. Almost no phenomena will measure absolute motion in space. Inertia will not show absolute motion. Therefore there is the covariance of physical laws. But relativity is not absolute. Space is absolute. Absolute motion can be detected with atomic clock experiments.</p>
<p>With the falsification of the principle of relativity, Einstein&#8217;s etherless theory of special relativity is undermined. Interestingly enough, the Hafele-Keating experiment, correctly interpreted, also falsifies the principle of equivalence, the founda tion of Einstein&#8217;s general theory of relativity. The principle of equivalence is that it is impossible by any means to detect the difference between gravity and a corresponding acceleration. But with the Hafele-Keating experiment, we see from experiment al data, not just theory, that atomic clocks go at constant rates at constant altitudes in a gravitational field, but go at constant rates at constant velocities, not constant accelerations. With sufficient experiments with atomic clocks it is possible to differentiate between accelerations and gravitational fields. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(40)</font></u><font face="Courier"> Thus Einstein&#8217;s whole Theory of General Relativity is based on a faulty foundation. Again the principle of equivalence is nearly true. Accelerometers ca nnot differentiate between gravity and inertia. But atomic clocks can. Therefore the principle of equivalence is partial, not absolute. </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Some have argued that the motions of the jets around the earth and of the earth itself were accelerated motions, not covered by special relativity. But the special relativistic formulas did harmonize well with the measured results, and besides there is no acceleration term in time dilation&#8211;only velocity terms and gravity terms. Gravity is thus more like a gradient of velocities in space than like an acceleration.</p>
<p align="left">The results of the Hafele-Keating experiment should have been more of a scientific scandal than the Michelson-Morley experiment. But scientists have been slow to discern the true character of those results.</p>
<p></font><font size="4" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">I. Ether Quasi-Relativity</p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">How could Einstein&#8217;s theories of relativity provide the correct formulas for the Hafele-Keating experiment, when his principle of relativity and principle of equivalence are false? Actually, while Einstein made a big point out of the principle of relativity (it was his first postulate) and ascribed his theory to it, his Special Theory of Relativity was not based on the principle of relativity, per se, but on the assumption that there is a covariance of physical laws (which is true) and that the speed of light is constant to all observers (which is also a true assumption and quite separate from the principle of relativity).</p>
<p>The Hafele-Keating experiment shows that there is an absolute space after all. Is there also an ether? Several recent experimental and theoretical results can best be accounted for by an ether system. A hard vacuum seems to have immense positive pressure. Particles like protons are seen to be bubbles in the vacuum. In the bag model of quarks it takes energy to push aside ordinary space&#8211;about 55 million ev/cubic fermi. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(41)</font></u><font face="Courier"> Another interesting recent concept is the &#8220;decay of the vacuum&#8221;&#8211;the electrical ionization of the vacuum in the presence of a strong localized electric charge&#8211;such as the nucleus of a hypothetical atom with Z = 173 or more. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(42)</font></u><font face="Courier"> </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">The easiest way to account for such phenomena would be to theorize an actual fluid of near-zero rest mass particles in the vacuum that can be electrically polarized and ionized,&#8211;a luminiferous ether so to speak. Is there an ether after all?</p>
<p>Recently there has developed renewed interest in an ether, with new evidence of the existence of an ether consisting of a sea of neutrinos and gravitons. Estimates have been made of the density of this ether. <u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(43)</font></u></p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Perhaps there is an absolute space and an ether after all. But what about relativity? Einstein&#8217;s formulas for special and general relativity proved correct in the Hafele-Keating experiment as well as in many other experiments. Certainly we cannot go back to classical mechanics even with an ether. What we need is not an absolute reference frame with an ether merely, or relativity without an ether, but relativity up to a point (quasi-relativity) in an ether. We may see a grand ether-relativity duality in nature similar to and parallel to the particle-wave duality.</p>
<p>It was once popular to believe in an absolute space defined by an ether. But this became unpopular after the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Careful interferometry failed to detect an expected ether drift across the surface of the planet. Einstein accounted for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment by assuming the speed of light is constant to all observers and deriving his Special Theory of Relativity. If there is covariance of physical laws and the constancy of c, the reason will be a null result to every Michelson-Morley type of experiment with or without an ether simply because the speed of light is constant to all observers. Einstein did not say that an ether was incompatible with relativity. He said, &#8220;the introductio n of a &#8216;luminiferous ether&#8217; will prove to be superfluous inasmuch as the view here to be developed will not require an &#8216;absolute stationary space&#8217; provided with special properties, nor assign a velocity vector to a point of the empty space in which electromagnetic processes take place. </font><u><font color="#0000ff" face="Courier">(44)</font></u><font face="Courier"> His calculations of special relativity may not have required an absolute space, but modern experiment has. Also, general relativity introduces a preferred coordinate system if special relativity does not. If Einstein had studied the principle of equivalence of gravity and inertia before the principle of relativity, he might have had a different view of the need for an absolute space. </font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">There is another convincing evidence that there is an ether and an absolute space. For the last 30 years of his life, Albert Einstein attempted to derive a unified field theory in which gravity is united to the electric force. He failed in his attempt. Many others have subsequently tried and failed to do this feat. Scientists have also likened the difficulty of uniting relativity and particle physics to attempts to unite fire and ice. This book will show that in both problems the difficulty is with Einstein&#8217;s etherless theory of relativity. With quasi-relativity in an ether the solutions to the above two problems are possible and can be understood by undergraduate physics students in college if not by those in high school.</p>
<p></font><font size="5" face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Problem Set 2</p>
<p></font><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">Did Maxwell interpret his laws in an ether or without an ether?&#8221; See C, Wave-Ether Theory above bottom line his theory of &#8220;aether straines.&#8221;"</p>
<p align="left"># 12 See also JLDAnoligies #1 through #27 of Science and Above for Jack L. Doan&#8217;s aEther and now the J_Wvs &amp; J_Ether.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;How many forces can you now explain with an electrical ether? [If you finish this volume you will be able to explain them all with an electrical ether.]&#8220;</p>
<p align="left"># 13 All of these unified field forces are explained by J_Wvs &amp; J_Ethr which is being compared to this volume of this text Formulating the Universe from the Internet.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Did the Michelson-Morley experiment prove there is no ether?&#8221; # 14 No because J_Ethr is part of and dominated localy by the system used in their experiment,</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;What did the Michelson-Morley experiment prove?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">#15 That the speed of light is the same in all directions through J_Ethr so it in a classical explainaton the J_Ethr apears to be dragged along with their experiment.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Does Einstein&#8217;s Special Theory of Relativity actually require the assumption of the absolute principle of relativity? On what two postulates is it actually based?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 16 (C:\\Documents and Settings\\Owner\\My Documents\\CONSIS_Co-Varance of Physical Laws.pdf&#8221;) &amp; The speed of light is the same in all directions see the question befor this last one.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Can any experiment be devised to show absolute motion through space?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 17 Yes sub solar system size with current computers &amp; Space technology.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;What devices would be required?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 18 Using a much larger Michelson-Morley experiment with point #1 &amp; #2 on the earth, #3 on one L5 satelite and #4 on another L5 satelite and #5 on the moon see Fig. 2-1 above for J_Wvs &amp; J_Ethr light propagation between systems.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Can any experiment be devised to show the difference between gravity and constant acceleration?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 19 Yes sub solar system size like above.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;What devices would be required?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 20 The same as above with a J_Wvs detector inerferometer new and unique invention that detects the macro reflections of the spiraling spherical grid of J_Wvs &amp; J_Ethr.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;What can account for immese pressure in a vacuum?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 21 The momentum of the tours J_Wvs and the equal and opposite of the momentum of the J_Ethr string core at the center of the J_Wvs.spiraling four deminsionaly out from the nucluii of all atoms in J_Unvrs.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;What could account for the ability of the vacuum to ionize?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 22 J_Wvs can ioniz in a vacuum simular to the way in which 137 of them form an electron in the inner electron shell of an atom.</p>
<p align="left"> &#8221;The ages-long tug-of-war between particle and wave models of light was in this century resolved by the recognition of a profound particle-wave duality. In view of that fact, how would you resolve the paradox between the need for an absolute reference frame with an ether and the need for relativity (up to now without an ether)?&#8221;</p>
<p align="left"># 23 Relativity is the Bases of J_Wvs &amp; J_Ethr E = m c^2 .</p>
<p><strong>The mass increase observation of one system concidered as being stationary relative to the mass of another that are equal when the two systems are stationary relative to each other.At this point the disclosure of what mass is shall be described. The mass of an electron is in each of the J_Electron waves, the accumulative mass of the 137 J_ElctrnPhtnWvs in the electron&#8217;s orbit of the inner electron shell of an atom. The mass of each of the J_ElctrnPhotnWvs that are tordial shaped are also J_GrvtyPhtnWvs that create the J_Ethr center of these J_Wvs that spiral outward toward to their limit in the J_Unvrs. The mass in protons and neutrons that are also the accumulative J_Wvs mass within the atom nucleus so that that the J_Wvs that the tiny strings of &#8220;The String Theory&#8221; have mass a momentum as result of J_WvTrdlWvFrm that in equal and oposite reaction first in the closed tiny strings of these wave forms that have a loop of J_Ether that moves through their core in equal and opposite direction in the loop. The tiny open string that aligns itself to longer cosmolgical strings that form the quark tewistors. in all cases the mass of the enities are the tours J_Wvs action causing an equal and opposite reaction in their J_Ethr core.The mass of all these enities of one inertial system moves at a speed aspecialy approching the speed of light relative to the mass of the enities of another inertial system. This is because the J_Wvs &amp; J_Ethr momentum of the two inertial systems moving relative to each other have an increas in their overlaping inertial instant reaction at a distance to this relative motion of these two inertial systems.</strong><strong> The J_Energy increase as thes 2 inertial systems and their associated mass therefor is increased &#8220;E = M c^2&#8243; gives the total J_Energy that would be created If all the mass in one of the inertial systems was changed into J_Energy. Well except in an atomic explosion this wouldn&#8217;t happen. The energy in the relative motion of the 2 inertial systems and the J_Energy created and therefor the 2 systems of mass also each have the coresponding increases. </strong><strong>  </strong><strong></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;m&#8217; = m / (1-v^2 / c^2)^.5</p>
<p>m&#8217;</strong> The function of increase of mass of two inertial systems moving relative to each other.&#8221;<strong></p>
<p align="left"># 23a The time dilation where if the frequency of one inertal system&#8217;s 137 J_ElctrnPhntnWvs in the its atom&#8217;s inner J_ElctrnShllOrbt is used as a space-time atomic clock is moving relative to another inertial systems&#8217;s 137 J_ElctrnPhtnWvs in its space-time atomic clock the J_GrvtyPhtns which are prportional to its clock frequency are dilated more of these J_Wvs pass a segment of the two systems J_EthrStrgs overlap so that from the system considerd as being stationary the other systems clock is going slower proportional to its J_GrvtyPhtns passing through the same J_EthrStrg overlap section of J_Wvs.</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;t&#8217; = t (1-v^2 / c^2)^.5&#8243;             # 23b The function of decreased number of J_Wvs of a moving systems clock relative to a stationnary system.</p>
<p></strong></font></strong></font></strong></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/93/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=93&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/2nd-part-chapter-2-formulating-the-universe-mathamatica-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/mm-inferometer.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mm-inferometer.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Michelson-morley.png/400px-Michelson-morley.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Though using a contemporary laser, this Michelson interferometer is the same in principle as those used in the original experiment.</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/skins-1.5/common/images/magnify-clip.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Michelson_Interferometer_Red_Laser_Interference.jpg/180px-Michelson_Interferometer_Red_Laser_Interference.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Interference pattern produced with a Michelson Interferometer using a red laser.</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/skins-1.5/common/images/magnify-clip.png" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-2mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-2mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-3mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-3mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-4mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-4mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-6mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-6mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-7mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-7mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-9mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-9mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2-10mm.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2-10mm.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DISCOVER AUGUST 2005 page 30 &amp; 31 with my insert under images</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tiny strings above are open &#38; the tiny strings above are closed strings of &#8220;The String Theory&#8221;.  My previous Weblog DISCOVER AUGUST 2005 page 29 &#38; 30 referred to &#8220;turning the page&#8221; of 29 to see pages 30 &#38; 31 above. My J_v cosmic string is similar to the right side image on that [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=91&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-90" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images//" title="tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-30.jpg"><img width="179" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-30.thumbnail.jpg?w=179&#038;h=228" alt="tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-30.jpg" height="228" style="width:219px;height:206px;" /></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-92" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images//" title="tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-31.jpg"><img width="129" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-31.thumbnail.jpg?w=129&#038;h=219" alt="tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-31.jpg" height="219" style="width:212px;height:225px;" /></a></p>
<p>The tiny strings above are open &amp; the tiny strings above are closed strings of &#8220;The String Theory&#8221;.  My previous Weblog DISCOVER AUGUST 2005 page 29 &amp; 30 referred to &#8220;turning the page&#8221; of 29 to see pages 30 &amp; 31 above. My J_v cosmic string is similar to the right side image on that page 29. The J_V cosmic string is made up of the above tiny strings. The J_Wv is formed by the open strings in the image on the left and the J_Wv cosmic string core that is moving the opposite direction in time is made up of the closed strings that forms gravity &amp; magnetic attractive force fields. Mater and mass are composed of both open and closed tiny strings of &#8220;The String Theory&#8221;.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-90" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images//" title="tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-30.jpg"></a></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/91/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=91&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-30-31-with-my-insert-under-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-30.thumbnail.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-30.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-31.thumbnail.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-august-2005-page-31.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DISCOVER AUGUST 2005 page 29 &amp; 30 with my insert under images</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-29-30-with-my-insert-under-images/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-29-30-with-my-insert-under-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-29-30-with-my-insert-under-images/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This image on the above right side is the nearest to a cosmic J_Wv (JLDoan Four Dimensional Wave). This scan is from DISCOVER AUGST 2005 page 29 letter from discover Stringing along a Theory.  My cosmic J_Wv from the nucleus of an atom into its electron shell forming the electrons&#8217; mass and charge with the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=81&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-80" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-29-30-with-my-insert-under-images//" title="cosmic-string-of-tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-8-07.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/cosmic-string-of-tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-8-07.jpg?w=480" alt="cosmic-string-of-tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-8-07.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>This image on the above right side is the nearest to a cosmic J_Wv (JLDoan Four Dimensional Wave). This scan is from DISCOVER AUGST 2005 page 29 letter from discover Stringing along a Theory.  My cosmic J_Wv from the nucleus of an atom into its electron shell forming the electrons&#8217; mass and charge with the splitting off into electromagnetic fields at times. The equal but opposite direction J_Wv core included cosmic string back to the nucleus forms the force field of gravity. As the cosmic J_Wv proceeds on out from the electron shells of the atom in the form of photons, other electromagnetic radiation, neutrinos and the force field that causes the universe to expand the cosmic string J_Wv core string force field of gravity&#8217;s&#8217; inertia, momentum and other force effects on mass. The J_Wv cosmic string is composed of tiny strings of &#8220;The String Theory&#8221;. The vibratory J_Energy of these strings form the J_Aether, dark energy and mass. This J_Aether is also the medium of the J_Universe in which electromagnetic, gravity force fields are propagated. The next page 30 referred to in the left image&#8217;s article bottom line is in my next Weblog.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/81/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=81&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/discover-august-2005-page-29-30-with-my-insert-under-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/cosmic-string-of-tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-8-07.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cosmic-string-of-tiny-strings-of-the-string-theory-discover-8-07.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Modified &#8220;Formulating the Universe&#8221;by unknown Author by #1 inserts at end</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/modified-formulating-the-universeby-unknown-author-by-1-inserts-at-end/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/modified-formulating-the-universeby-unknown-author-by-1-inserts-at-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/modified-formulating-the-universeby-unknown-author-by-1-inserts-at-end/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Formulating the Universe-Chapter One Chapter 1 PARTICLE OR WAVE This volume derives a unified field theory and a unified particle theory.Formulating a unified theory is a feat not possible without taking advantage of the insight gained through centuries of physical experiment and model building.This chapter and the next shall glean preliminary insights from the evolution [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=67&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong><strong><font face="Courier"></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Formulating the Universe-Chapter One</p>
<p align="left">Chapter 1</p>
<p align="left">PARTICLE OR WAVE</p>
<p align="left">This volume derives a unified field theory and a unified particle theory.Formulating a unified theory is a feat not possible without taking advantage of</p>
<p align="left">the insight gained through centuries of physical experiment and model building.This chapter and the next shall glean preliminary insights from the evolution of</p>
<p align="left">physics theories.From 1650 to 1925 intense speculation prevailed regarding the nature of light</p>
<p align="left">and the mechanism of light transmission.Scientific thought oscillated between</p>
<p align="left">two opposing theoretical models&#8211;the corpuscular theory and the wave</p>
<p align="left">theory&#8211;before a harmoniously paradoxical,duality was seen to explain</p>
<p align="left">light and matter.&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;A.Wave</p>
<p align="left">In several countries of Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries scientists studied</p>
<p align="left">diffraction,or the spreading of light into shadows.It was first observed in</p>
<p align="left">Italy in the 17th century.In England a worker observed the interference colors</p>
<p align="left">of thin films,like an oil film on a wet road surface,or in the iridescent</p>
<p align="left">colors of a butterfly&#8217;s wing.He felt that light consisted of vibrations</p>
<p align="left">propagated at high speed.A scientist in Holland,Christian Huygens,improved</p>
<p align="left">the wave theory.B.Particle</p>
<p align="left">In England Sir Isaac Newton didn&#8217;t attach much importance to the small amount of</p>
<p align="left">spreading of light and believed that rectilinear propagation could not be</p>
<p align="left">reconciled with the wave theory.Polarization phenomena (which can be accounted for by transverse wave motion in a single plane) discovered in the 17th century by a Danish physicist,Erasmus Bartholin,and by Huygens were not consistent with the theory of</p>
<p align="left">longitudinal waves (waves vibrating in the direction of propagation,like compression waves in a coiled spring),which was the only wave theory then</p>
<p align="left">considered.Newton therefore supported the corpuscular theory,although he did</p>
<p align="left">not reject the wave theory completely.&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;Isaac Newton (1642-1727),the discoverer of the law of gravity,calculus,and</p>
<p align="left">Newtonian mechanics,championed the particle model of light.He believed light ,</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">is like a barrage of minute speeding bullets,&#8221;  &#8220;and that the laws applicable to</p>
<p align="left">material objects could account also for light behavior.Moving objects tend to</p>
<p align="left">go in straight lines because of inertia;light travels in straight lines.An</p>
<p align="left">obstacle in the path of a spray of bullets blanks out the spray behind it,just</p>
<p align="left">as the illuminated object casts a shadow.The angle of incidence equals the</p>
<p align="left">angle of reflection for a ball striking a wall and also for light reflected from</p>
<p align="left">a smooth surface (specular reflection).Newton was able to explain diffuse</p>
<p align="left">reflection of light by means of microscopic roughness of the reflecting surface.Newton&#8217;s particle model made the inverse square law of light intensity</p>
<p align="left">intuitively obvious.It also brilliantly anticipated light pressure,and</p>
<p align="left">accounted for absorption heating.However,the particle model did not do so well</p>
<p align="left">with refraction.Refraction is the bending of light at the surface boundary of diverse media,such as air and water,or a vacuum and glass.This change of light ray direction</p>
<p align="left">is always such that</p>
<p><strong>n = Sin[Theta] / Sin[Theta r]</strong><strong></p>
<p align="left">Csc [Theta r] Sin[Theta i]           (1-1)</p>
<p align="left">where sin i is the sine of the angle of incidence,sin r is the sine of the</p>
<p align="left">angle of refraction,and n12 is the relative index of refraction of the two</p>
<p align="left">transparent media.If the light goes from a vacuum to a refractive medium,the</p>
<p align="left">law is</p>
<p align="left">nm = (Sin[Theta i] / Sin[Theta x])</p>
<p></strong><strong></p>
<p align="left">Csc[Theta x] Sin[Theta i]             (1-2)</p>
<p align="left">where nm is the index of refraction of the medium.Newton could account for this observed law of light (Snell&#8217;s law) only by</p>
<p align="left">assuming that the particles of light receive a little push at the surface of the</p>
<p align="left">medium and travel faster in the refractive medium than in air or a vacuum.&#8221;</p>
<p align="left">&#8220;In spite of the opposing wave model,this view was dominant for over a century.But later careful measurements showed that light goes slower in a refractive</p>
<p align="left">medium such as water or glass than in air or a vacuum,not faster.&#8221;  &#8221;According</p>
<p align="left">to Newton&#8217;s particle theory,</p>
<p align="left">c=(299792458)</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p align="left">299792458 Meters per second</p>
<p><strong></p>
<p align="left">nm=c/vm                                (1-3)</p>
<p></strong><strong>where vm is the speed of light in the medium and c is the speed of light in a</strong><strong></p>
<p align="left">vacuum.However,the precise opposite was found to be true.In actuality,</p>
<p align="left">nm=vm/c                                (1-4)</p>
<p align="left">Because of this ddiscrepancy, the particle modelof light appeared to fail.&#8221;</p>
<p>At this </strong><strong>point in this Text &#8220;Formulating the Universe&#8221; J_Wvs &amp; J_Ethr &amp; J_Phtns and classical wave fronts of electrical-magnetic radiation New and Unique explanation is inserted into this text chapters 1, 2 &amp;3 all related to J_TOE as follows:</strong><strong></p>
<p align="left">#1 J_Phtns are not like Newton conceived being like speeding bullets but are part of J_Ethr the medium where J_PhtnWvs that are toridal waves containing many J_ElmntryWvs tiny strings from &#8220;The String Theory&#8221; that create in an equal and opposite reaction in the core of the J_PhtnWvs a cosmological string (J_Ethr) that both the J_Ethr and the J_PhtnWvs move through space-time 90 degrees to the direction of electromagnetic spherical wavefront propagation.The classical spherical wavefront that actuates the J_PhtnsWvs that are moving through space-time in a direction 90 degrees to the classical wave fronts motion that moves at the speed of light ( c ) relative to the classical vacuum of space-time. If the J_Ethr is incorporated with J_ElctrnShll of an atom then the J_Phtn&#8217;s mass &amp; momentum driven by the classical wavefront through the space-time of J_Ethr impacts the mass &amp; momentum of J_ElctrnPhtnWv so that when a J_Quantum amount of energy in the J_ElctrnPhtnWvs that are resonant in the orbit around the nucleus of the atom will cause the addition of this J_Quantum that adds another J_ElctrnPhntnWv to that lower orbits J_ElctrnPhtnWvStrng to move to a J_ElctrnShll that is outside at an integer increase in its radius. The remainder of this chapter 1 and as well as the questions regarding the wave-particle and aether are answered later and at the start of part 3 of this jackbecomspeedne&#8217;s Weblog. </p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p></strong></font></strong></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/67/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=67&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/modified-formulating-the-universeby-unknown-author-by-1-inserts-at-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Part J_Wv (JLDoan Electron_Photon Four Dimensional Wave)</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/2nd-part-j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/2nd-part-j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/2nd-part-j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EW at the top of this Mathamatica 5 program output is 1/2 J_Wv Electron Wavelength (so there is an error in the 2nd orange text line at the top of this output). Before the J_Wv Quark is further disclosed the inner shell of  an atom is described: There are 137 J_Wv electron wavelengths tn [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=66&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-65" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/2nd-part-j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/65/" title="2nd-part-j_wv-electron-wavelength-matha5.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2nd-part-j_wv-electron-wavelength-matha5.jpg?w=480" alt="2nd-part-j_wv-electron-wavelength-matha5.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The EW at the top of this Mathamatica 5 program output is 1/2 J_Wv Electron Wavelength (so there is an error in the 2nd orange text line at the top of this output).</p>
<p>Before the J_Wv Quark is further disclosed the inner shell of  an atom is described: There are 137 J_Wv electron wavelengths tn the circumference of an atoms inner shell. This rounded off length is 6.46 (10^-15) cm. To approximate the image above of 2 wavelengths not to scale Pi was used as the wave length of  1 wavelength so 2Pi is the length of 2 J_Wvs shown.  If the wave in the center was stretched to the x dimension of the box it would be a better approximation of my J_Wv. This image didn&#8217;t print in the first part of this Mathamatica 5 program output copied into the blog post before the last. I will see how it works this time so if anyone should want to print this blog post they could.</p>
<p>The image of the spiral before the image in the paragraph above is a general spiral that will be used later to describe the J_Wv J_Ether connecting the J_Proton to the J_Electron inner shell (JLDoan Electron_Photon Four Dimensional Wave).</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/66/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=66&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/2nd-part-j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/2nd-part-j_wv-electron-wavelength-matha5.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2nd-part-j_wv-electron-wavelength-matha5.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The only similar wave form to my J_Wv seen by me</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/the-only-similar-wave-form-to-my-j_wv-seen-by-me/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/the-only-similar-wave-form-to-my-j_wv-seen-by-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/the-only-similar-wave-form-to-my-j_wv-seen-by-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This image is from Segal Conformal Physics and GraviPhotons                 This would be the crest of J_Wv Quark which orientate themselves as (up, down strange, or as other characteristics&#8217;. This J_Wv Quark is moving up along its center axis. Quarks are the building blocks that most physicist think all mater &#38; energy are made of initially in the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=62&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-64" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/the-only-similar-wave-form-to-my-j_wv-seen-by-me/64/" title="robinson.jpg"></a><img width="373" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/proton_twisclifp.gif?w=373&#038;h=324" alt="proton_twisclifp.gif" height="324" /></p>
<p>This image is from Segal Conformal Physics and GraviPhotons</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-64" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/the-only-similar-wave-form-to-my-j_wv-seen-by-me/64/" title="robinson.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/robinson.jpg?w=480" alt="robinson.jpg" /></a>                This would be the crest of J_Wv Quark which orientate themselves as (up, down strange, or as other characteristics&#8217;. This J_Wv Quark is moving up along its center axis. Quarks are the building blocks that most physicist think all mater &amp; energy are made of initially in the high temperature and pressure at the start of the big bang. My concept is the tiny strings of the &#8220;String Theory&#8221; came before quarks in that environment and are the building blocks or tiny strings of the &#8220;String Theory&#8221; which forms quarks, mass, energy, in my analogy to THEORY OF EVERYTHING.  I haven&#8217;t conceived of how these tiny strings were formed into possibly the &#8220;brames&#8221; of the &#8220;String Theory&#8221;, in this environment. My concept of my J_Wv&#8217;s formation in going from the high temperature heat to less dense, lower temperature heat and pressure these tiny strings formed my J_Wv (like a drop of water moves along a stalagmite forming this core in this process).</p>
<p>I make this disclosure of my Jack L. Doan Concept of &#8220;brames&#8221; and J_Wv Quarks October 24, 2007   </p>
<p>At the bottom of this torus J_Ether cosmic (very small diameter) J_String is formed and reformed from the tiny strings of the &#8220;String Theory&#8221;as it comes down this inner cylinder that becomes the tube through another J_Wv or a J_Wv J_Ether J_String. </p>
<p>The top Fig. 6-3 For a general twistor Z^3 is similar to J_Wv (JLDoan_Wave).</p>
<p>Both the top and bottom robinson image possibly with the tiny strings moving in the direction of the arrow heads form themselves into a membrane &#8220;brane&#8221; in going from the high pressure temperature heat to less high pressure temperature heat like my J_Wvs in taking the path of least resistance. The J_WV Quarks in a strong force attraction combining two in the up configuration with one in the down configuration for a proton  forming J_Wvs and J_WV J_Ether J_String or vice versa for a neutron.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/62/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=62&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/the-only-similar-wave-form-to-my-j_wv-seen-by-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/proton_twisclifp.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">proton_twisclifp.gif</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/robinson.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">robinson.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>J_Wv (JLDoan Electron_Photon Four Dimensional Wave)</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first Mathematical 5 program output in this blog. The graphics are similar to the previous post 1&#8211;22-07 but isn&#8217;t as elongated as that one, which it should be in a to scale Four Dimensional J_Wavelength Waveform. In the Graphics3D above there are 2 J_Wv lengths approximate volume of revolution about the -3.23 [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=60&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg" title="jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg?w=480" alt="jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>This is the first Mathematical 5 program output in this blog. The graphics are similar to the previous post 1&#8211;22-07 but isn&#8217;t as elongated as that one, which it should be in a to scale Four Dimensional J_Wavelength Waveform. In the Graphics3D above there are 2 J_Wv lengths approximate volume of revolution about the -3.23 &amp;+3.23 x axis in the second graphics profile. The small gap between the profile curve and its x axis forms a hole inside the toroidal J_Wvs&#8217; there is small cylinder formed in this volume of revolution. This is the two wavelength part of the cosmic string J_Ether. </p>
<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg" title="jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg"></a></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/60/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=60&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/j_wv-jldoan-electron_photon-four-dimensional-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jldoan_wavej_wv.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>J_Wave top half of Profile</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/j_wave-top-half-of-profile/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/j_wave-top-half-of-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/j_wave-top-half-of-profile/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first photo of the upper half of the profile J_Wv (Jack L, Doan_Wave) that will be evolved into the explanation of the information in this blog up to this point. This two dimensional profile is revolved about its x axis creating a volume of revolution which moves along the x axis in time giving [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=56&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-55" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/j_wave-top-half-of-profile/55/" title="jldoan_wave1_dcp_1253.jpg"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/jldoan_wave1_dcp_1253.jpg?w=480" alt="jldoan_wave1_dcp_1253.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The first photo of the upper half of the profile J_Wv (Jack L, Doan_Wave) that will be evolved into the explanation of the information in this blog up to this point. This two dimensional profile is revolved about its x axis creating a volume of revolution which moves along the x axis in time giving one J_Wv Lgth (Jack L. Doan_Wave Length) in four dimensions. Within this volume there are the tiny strings of the &#8220;String Theory&#8221; of which the J_Wv is composed of moving along the x axis a very fine small diameter cosmic string  moving at the speed of light in the opposite direction. This cosmic string is the J_Ether that has been the topic of my blog up to this post.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/56/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=56&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/j_wave-top-half-of-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/jldoan_wave1_dcp_1253.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jldoan_wave1_dcp_1253.jpg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cosmic Triangle 5th image upload 2nd time</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/54/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/54/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/54/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Source Atoms in JLD’s Analogies approximated location in the Finite Spherical Universe: Pick the point in galaxy cluster with 0.44 Relative Density of Matter 0.6 Relative Density of : Dark Energy (JLD#1Analogy aEther) at -0.04 Spherical &#8211; Curvature of Space time #1JLD Analogy Universe at this point on Ternary Plot. This point is in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=54&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-53" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/54/53/" title="5th-image-after-3rd-part-jld-blog.jpg"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-53" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/54/53/" title="5th-image-after-3rd-part-jld-blog.jpg"></a></p>
<p>The Source Atoms in JLD’s Analogies approximated location in the Finite Spherical Universe:</p>
<p>Pick the point in galaxy cluster with 0.44 Relative Density of Matter 0.6 Relative Density of :</p>
<p>Dark Energy (JLD#1Analogy aEther) at -0.04 Spherical &#8211; Curvature of Space time #1JLD Analogy Universe at this point on Ternary Plot. This point is in Galaxy Cluster Data but not in the Super Nova Data on -0.04 Curvature of Space time #1JLD Analogy Universe. Within these source Atoms the start of #17JLDAnalogy Spiral String aEnergy (Higgs Particle-Energy) and aEther Unified Field Theory including Theory of Everything. Similar Cosmic Triangle to Scientific American February 2001 Page_48 Modified by Jack L. Doan to show #1JLD Analogy aEnergy String Quintessence, Universe.</p>
<p>48</p>
<p>#l JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy and aEther Unified Field Theory Including Theory of Everything not only explains the macro outer limits of the finite universe but also the microscopic and smaller inner limits of the mass and energy of our universe and how chemistry, magnetism, electricity, radiation and other physics are unified. Chemistry with the standard function of valance electrons in #2 JLD Analogy through #16 via #1 JLD Analogy with (vacuum energy &#8211; dark energy aEther with energy outward pressure as well as gravity inward pressure) are balanced in the electron shells in integral points relative to the nucleus of atoms so as to create the valance function.</p>
<p>#l JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory gives aEther in a static but JLD dynamic universe which Einstein dismissed. Now continuing the quote, next paragraph, &#8220;one proposal is that some heretofore undiscovered symmetry in fundamental physics results in a cancellation of large effects, zeroing out the vacuum energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>#l JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy (dark energy &#8211; vacuum energy) Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory of universe with aEther, gives the cancellation of the most of vacuum energy that Einstein cosmological constant gave rise to.</p>
<p>Next before proceeding, another quote from Scientific American, September 2000, page 104, right hand column of article &#8220;A New paradigm for Thomas Kuhn by Steve Fuller&#8221;. &#8220;Fuller marshals an astonishing detailed grasp of recent intellectual history to argue that science, as we know it, has outlived its usefulness. The paradigms of normal science are not the ideal form of science, he says, but rather &#8220;an arrested social movement in which the natural spread of knowledge is captured by a community that grants relative advantage by forcing other communities to rely on its expertise to get what they want.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fuller is especially effective at reconstructing the debates between Ernst Mach and Max Planck about the science at the beginning of the 20<sup>th</sup> century, which he takes as emblematic of all such debates since. In Fuller’s dichotomous scheme, Mach championed an instrumentalist philosophy of science; Planck was a realist. Mach lodged science in every day psychological experience; Planck reduced everyday experience to the ultimate constituents of physics. Mach exalted technology; Planck promoted abstract problem solving. Mach was a liberal democrat, intent on empowering &#8220;citizen scientists&#8221;; Planck was the state corporatist, who thought ordinary folks had no claim on &#8220;real&#8221; science.</p>
<p>Kuhn is squarely on the side of Planck, Fuller says. The paradigms of normal science, Fuller goes on to assert confer a phony legitimacy and autonomy of scientific practice. Alternative versions of the &#8220;truth&#8221; are delegitimized, and establishment science (with its consumerist-military alliances) becomes the only game in town. Young scientists are acculturated within the paradigm and spend the rest of their careers tweaking theories. Dissent is frowned upon. The real problems of society are ignored in the pursuit of the next decimal place.&#8221;</p>
<p>Though I haven’t read Kuhm, I agree with Fuller. From fundamental facets of my Analogy of Science page 2 of Jack L. Doan’s Analogies, page 30 of quote from &#8220;The Relativity Explosion,&#8221; chapter 8 matches principles, page 121, my discussion on this page 30 points out why I agree with Fuller.</p>
<p>49</p>
<p>My new paradigm presented in JLD Analogies as the way to JLD’s Unified Field Theory including JLD’s Theory of Everything.</p>
<p>In reference to the ternary graph, page 46 above, vacuum energy is proportional to dark energy both of which, by JLD Analogies, are not constant in energy for volume of space but are proportional to #l JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy which is proportional to JLD Analogy String aEther. Quote from page 47, Scientific American, January 2001 The Quintessential Universe by Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Paul J. Steinhardt, mid page, &#8220;Until recently, cosmologists have focused simply on proving the existence of dark energy. Having made a convincing case they are now turning their attention to a deeper problem: Where does the energy come from? The best-known possibility is that the energy is inherent in the</p>
<p>fabric of space. Even if a volume of space were utterly empty &#8211; without a bit of matter and radiation &#8211; it would still contain this energy. Such energy is a venerable notion that dates back to Albert Einstein and his attempt in 1917 to construct a static model of the universe. Like many leading scientists over the centuries, including Isaac Newton, Einstein believed that the universe is unchanging, neither contracting or expanding. To coax stagnation from his general theory of relativity, he had to introduce vacuum energy or, in his terminology, a cosmological constant. He adjusted the value of the constant so that its gravitation repulsion would exactly counterbalance the gravitational attraction of matter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now the creation of my Analogies #2 through #16 that will be studied similar to my study of the creation of #l JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy Unified Field Theorem including JLD Theory of Everything. The environment for the creation of #2 JLD Analogy through JLD #16 Analogy is different than it was for the creation of #1 JLD Analogy where in the first place the largeness of this spiral in relation to its developing atom; whereas my other analogies are smaller in relation to the same atom they are part of or related to. The #2 JLD Analogy of the Electron Cloud of its related atom formed by its #l JLD Spiral String aEnergy that creates in its related atom as well as in other atoms in high density of parts of other atoms related to #l JLD Analogy spiral parts of aEnergy strings so as to come in contact with other parts of the inward bound spiral string that creates spin-off of aEnergy into very small electron cloud particle size bundles or quantum bundles of split-off aEnergy string that stay in like quantum.</p>
<p>My next #17JLDAnalogy will be in developing the explanation of the Higgs Particle which if CERN’s LEP (Large Electron-Positron collider was allowed to be extended instead of being dismantled due to CERN’s (decision making process) politics based on money would become the largest particle 115 GeV Higgs Mass compared to the 1 GeV protron Mass, which might turn out to be part of #1JLDAnalogy.</p>
<p>Quote from Scientific American February 2001 page 17 &amp; 19. PHYSICS_ELEMENTARY P PARTICLES Higgs Won’t Fly CERN declines a massive opportunity to find the Higgs particle</p>
<p>&#8220;Postulated independently by British Physicist Peter Higgs and others in 1964, the Higgs plays a unique role in particle physics.In one guise, the Higgs is a field permeating the universe and giving the other particles their mass. If the field were turned off, the particles making up your body would presumably fly apart at the speed of light like so many photons. We have no way of directly detecting the all-pervasive Higgs field, but its other guise– individual Higgs particles, like tiny concentrated knots in the field–should be producible in violent collisions at accelerators. By studying the particle, physicists can verify the theory and pin down the Higgs’s many unknown properties.</p>
<p>50</p>
<p>In 2000 researchers optimized the 11- year -old LEP to conduct one last search for the Higgs, pushing it to achieve collision energies of 206.5 billion electron volts (GeV)–about 14GeV beyond its original design parameters. Most likely the Higgs would be too massive to fall within LEP’s extended reach, but in the summer, physicists saw signs of Higgs particles. Out of By comparison, a proton is 1 GeV millions of collisions, nine produced Higgs candidates. A one-month extension to LEP yielded additional results, sufficient to conclude that the odds that the results were noise were one in 250–a tantalizing result but uncertain to proclaim &#8220;discovery.&#8221; The data indicated that the Higgs has a mass of about 115- GeV.(the remaining collision energy goes into creating a so-called Z particle at 91 GeV). By comparison, a proton is 1 GeV. A 115-GeV Higgs would agree nicely with predictions of Supersymmetry models–the idea that particles in the Standard Model have &#8220;Supersymmetric&#8221; partners.&#8221;</p>
<p>2-3-2001</p>
<p>Next, the development of #17 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy (Higgs particle-energy) as part of #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy and aEther Unified Field Theory Including Theory of Everything in exploring the possibility the spiral radius of this combination is less than the finite radius of the spherical universe. The first question is how much of the #17 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy (Higgs particle &#8211; energy) extends beyond the radius of the proton particle #3 JLD Analogy. First, could this be the #17 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy (Higgs particle-energy) that extends to the radii of the different levels of electron clouds in its associated atom? Also, could this #17 JLD Analogy be in combination with #1 JLD Analogy be the super symmetric partners?</p>
<p>This mass 115 GeV (the remaining collision energy goes into creating Z particle at 91 GeV). By comparison , a proton is 1 GeV. This data from top left of page 18 of Scientific American February 2001. Allegorically the start of #1 JLDAnalogy with this #17 JLD from the 1 GeV proton page 36. First see if #17 JLD Analogy could be the link between the proton and the electron cloud like in hydrogen atom. Allegorize the smashing of a hydrogen proton by a positron accelerated by 206.5 billion electron volts (GeV) about 14 GeV greater than LEP(Large Electron Positron Collider) was designed for. The original LEP would have been, I assume, 206.5 GeV minus 14 GeV. So, the original LEP was 192.5 GeV. The #17 JLD Analogy (Higgs dark energy) Spiral String aEnergy equals 115 billion electron volts (GeV). #2 JLD Analogy Spiral String electron aEnergy electron volts with the value of 1 electron volt times 115 is the energy imparted to an electron when it is accelerated through a potential difference of 1 volt from &#8220;Physics for Engineering Technology, page 105, last sentence, third paragraph. Physics for Engineering Technology by Joseph, Pomeranz, Prince and Sacher.</p>
<p>Now, before continuing, here is a quote from Popular Science, February 2001, page 74, second paragraph. &#8220;But if the universe is flat, what is dark energy? Although there are a number of proposals, says Perlmutter, no one really has any clue what it could be. And the best theoretical calculation of the value of the cosmological constant overestimates the weight of all the dark energy in the universe by a whooping factor of 10^100! Exercising his gift for understatement, Turner wonders if &#8220;maybe we are missing some deep principle.&#8221;"</p>
<p>The principle of #17 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy Unified Field Theory including JLD Theory of Everything is integrating this information with #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String a Energy Unified Field Theory including JLD Theory of Everything. The start of this integrating is with #17 JLD Analogy</p>
<p>51</p>
<p>Spiral String aEnergy as a part of its associated atoms mass.</p>
<p>E=mc^2 m=E/c^2 115 GvE/(2.998(10^8) meter per second)^2=M</p>
<p>M=8.534(10^-26)(newton)eV/meter/seconds ^2</p>
<p>Reviewing mass in &#8220;Physics for Engineering Technology&#8221;, page 124, Momentum equals mass * velocity =mV.</p>
<p>If an experiment indicates that two different objects have the same amount of inertia, the two objects may be said to have the same inertial mass. Originally the gram and the kilogram were defined in terms of the mass of a standard volume of water at normal temperature (20 degrees C): The mass of 1 cubic centimeter of water is 1 gram.</p>
<p>From page 126 density = mass/volume using the Greek letter p (rho) is usually used as a</p>
<p>mathematical symbol for density. The definition for density gives us the formula p=m/V</p>
<p>It is obvious from the definition of the gram and the kilogram that the density of water is 1 gram per cubic centimeter (1 gm. / cm.^3) or 1 kilogram per liter (1 kg. / l.). A common method of measuring the mass of objects. The indicator of the balance arm is centered when the force of gravity on the object equals the force of gravity on the standard mass. Since the operation of the equal &#8211; arm balance depends on the force of gravity, the mass determined in this way is called the gravitational mass of the object. Many experiments have established that the inertial mass and the gravitational mass of an object are equal.</p>
<p>If the object and the balance are moved to a different planet (or to a different place on the earth), the force of gravity will change. Before continuing on page 127 a different way of weighing an object on a spring scale &#8220;indicates how the force of gravity acting upon a 1-kg. Mass will vary.)&#8221; A 1 kg. Weight at the Canal Zone Panama = 2.198 pounds on an American spring scale and in Greenland it equals 2.209 pounds and on the moon = 0.365 pounds. The inertial mass and gravitational mass are equal on a balance with standard weight that will measure the mass of the standard weight the same even on the moon or a different planet or at a different place on the earth. The rate of change in momentum equal mass * the rate of change in velocity (acceleration).</p>
<p>Page 129 The force of gravity (in standard location on earth where gravity is 9.8 meters per second ^2) is usually referred to as the weight W, if the force W is the only force acting, the object would have an acceleration of 9.8 meters / second^2, using Newton’s second law of motion:</p>
<p>FR=ma W=mg=(standard mass) 5 kilogram (9.8 meters per second/^2)</p>
<p>=49kg. &#8211; meters / second^2 = 49 newtons</p>
<p>Page 131 Newton’s Third Law of Motion &#8220;For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction&#8221; is stated on this page.</p>
<p>Page 148 Centripetal force Fc=mv^2/r</p>
<p>Page 149 For a rotating mass F=ma centripetal = m4pi^2 frequency ^2r</p>
<p>52</p>
<p>Reviewing mass for a second time in text Introduction to College Physics by Rogers D. Rusk</p>
<p>page xvii &#8220;The mass of an object is the measure of its inertia and inertia is the tendency of a body to resist being set in motion or to resist any change in motion. It would be as difficult to throw a &#8220;fast&#8221; baseball horizontally on the moon as it would on the earth, though the ball would actually weigh only one-sixth what it does on the earth. The student , as he progresses through the subject of mechanics , must learn that exact meaning of mass and distinguish it clearly from weight. Mass is the measure of inertia,. Weight is a force, the earth’s gravitational pull on an object.</p>
<p>Since an object of twice the mass of an other has twice the weight at a particular place , weight is proportional to mass.&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 82 Newton’s second law; the dyne; the poundal; the newton</p>
<p>&#8220;Newton’s second law gives a quantitative measure of the effect of an unbalanced force when bodies interact.</p>
<p>Second law: The acceleration (rate of change in velocity) of any body is directly proportional to the force acting on it and is inversely proportional to the mass of the body. If the force is doubled , the acceleration of the body with respect to any chosen frame of reference is doubled and so on. But if the mass, m, is increased, the force, F, must be likewise increased in order to produce the same acceleration, a, these relations are expressed in the fundamental formula of dynamics:</p>
<p>F = ma [Eq. 6-1]</p>
<p>: For the exception, when an object travels with an extremely high velocity, see Einstein’s theory of relativity</p>
<p>Page 164 (4) The velocity of light is an upper limit which the velocity of an object can only approach and never exceed. More surprising perhaps than all else, Einstein predicted that matter is a form of energy and can be converted into energy according to the formula E (energy) = mc^2 where m represents a mass and c represents the velocity of light&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 597 Atomic Mass Unit and Atomic Weights</p>
<p>&#8220;One-sixteenth of the mass of an oxygen 16 atom, or 1.66 (10^-24) gram, is now taken to be the unit of atomic mass. It is called an atomic mass unit. On this scale the ordinary hydrogen atom has a mass slightly more than one mass unit and the average of the isotopes which make up natural silver, for instance, is 107.88 mass units. Atomic weights hence need not be thought of as purely relative numbers but may be thought of as actual weights (or masses) in terms of this new unit.</p>
<p>One might expect then, if hydrogen (or the proton which is a hydrogen nucleus) is the basic constituent of all matter, that the mass of the hydrogen atom should be exactly 1/16th that of oxygen 16. However, a single hydrogen atom by itself has a slightly larger mass. When protons (and neutrons) combine to form a heavier nucleus there is some loss of mass which is transformed into energy according to the Einstein energy-mass relation. The shrinkage in mass represents a loss of energy. Conversely, to separate an atomic nucleus into its components, this amount of energy much be restored to the atom. But this is not so easy and the amount required for the stable atoms is very large; this explains why they are so stable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 559 Path of Electron In Magnetic Field</p>
<p>&#8220;If an electron stream is produced in an evacuated tube by using an accelerating anode with a hole in it, the undeflected beams at A and produce a visible spot on a fluorescent screen. If the stream is deflected during a portion of its path by the magnet NS, the beam will strike the screen at B and the mass of the electron can be calculated from the measured deflection AB. It turns out to be</p>
<p>53</p>
<p>Me = 0.000000000000000000000000000911(10^-28)gm</p>
<p>This is 1/1836 the mass of a hydrogen atom, and the electron is thought to have a diameter l/100,000 that of a hydrogen atom.&#8221; I clarify the shell diameter to the spiral string aEnergy spherical shell diameter of the cloud around its proton.</p>
<p>Page 559 Variation of Mass With Velocity (Einstein’s theory)</p>
<p>&#8220;Measurements by Kauffman and others on the deflection of electrons of different velocities confirmed Einstein’s equation which gives the mass mv at any velocity v in terms of the rest mass m0 (rest with respect to the observer) and the velocity of light, c, as follows</p>
<p>mv = m0/(1-v^2/c^2)^½ [Eq. 36-5]</p>
<p>It will be seen from this that the velocity of the electron can only approach the velocity of light but never reach it, for at that velocity its mass would become infinite.</p>
<p>Page 560 The Ratio of Charge to Mass For An Electron</p>
<p>As previously stated, it was not at first possible to obtain separately either the charge or the mass of an electron, and Eq 36-3 was actually used first to obtain the ratio of charge to mass, but e/m solving for this ratio instead of for mass, we have</p>
<p>e/m = v/Hr [Eq. 36-6]</p>
<p>In which the quantities, v, H, and r are easily obtainable. This ratio is useful because it occurs in so many equations involving the behavior of electrons, and the experimental value is</p>
<p>e/m = 1.76(10^7) abcoul/gm</p>
<p>= 1.76(10^8) coul/gm&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 158 Gravitation And Our Universe</p>
<p>&#8220;In the mks system, it has the value</p>
<p>G = 6.67 (10^-11) newton * meters^2/kg^2</p>
<p>In the English system (when the masses are measured in lbs, the distance in feet, and the force in poundals),</p>
<p>G = 1.066 (10^-9) poundals * ft^2/pounds ^2&#8243;</p>
<p>Page 82 in the middle of Mass versus Weight</p>
<p>&#8220;According to agreement by the International Committee on Weights and Measures this standard reference point is any point where the acceleration of gravity, g, is exactly 980.665 cm/sec^2 or 32.174 ft/sec^2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 159 Determination of the Mass of the Earth</p>
<p>but first Newton’s law of gravity [eq 11-2] from page 157</p>
<p>F = Gm1m2/r^2 [Eq 11-2]</p>
<p>&#8220;Knowing the value of the gravitational constant, Newton’s law of gravitation [Eq. 11-2] makes it possible to calculate the force between any two masses when the distance between their centers of gravity is known. Conversely, if the force is known and one of the masses is unknown, it can be calculated. Since we know that the force between the earth and a one gram mass is one gram of force or 980 dynes, we can hence calculate the mass of the earth.</p>
<p>Page 160 Gravitation and Our Universe</p>
<p>&#8220;Let M be the unknown mass of the earth. Then by eq. 11-2</p>
<p>980 dynes = 6.67(10^-8)*1(gm)*M(gm)/r^2(cm^2)</p>
<p>Where r = radius of earth = 4,000 miles = 640,000,000 (64(10^7)) centimeters (approximately). From this</p>
<p>54</p>
<p>M = 6(10^27)grams (approx.)</p>
<p>= 6 thousand billion billion metric tons</p>
<p>(1 thousand kilograms = 1 metric ton)</p>
<p>= 6.6 thousand billion billion English tons</p>
<p>It should not be forgotten that when the earth pulls on a 1 gram mass with a l gram force, the 1 gram mass is also pulling on the earth with the same force (Newton’s third law).&#8221;</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/54/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=54&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/54/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th image after 3rd part this blog section page 44</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           44                                                                                                                                                  Pluto Neptune Uranus Saturn Jupiter Ceres Mars Earth Venus Mercury                                                                                                                                                 45 Newton put all of gravities effects together later after Kepler’s Law above. Then Einstein showed the masses outside of the solar system above had some effect on the planet’s orbits. My analogy integrates this information and shows that JLD Unified [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=46&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-45" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/45/" title="period-in-earth-years.JPG"></a>                                                                                                                                       </p>
<p>                                                                                                                                                   44</p>
<p>                                                                                                                                                 Pluto</p>
<p align="left"><a rel="attachment wp-att-45" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/45/" title="period-in-earth-years.JPG"><img align="left" width="125" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/period-in-earth-years.JPG?w=125&#038;h=313" alt="period-in-earth-years.JPG" height="313" style="width:432px;height:431px;" /></a>Neptune</p>
<p>Uranus</p>
<p>Saturn</p>
<p>Jupiter</p>
<p>Ceres</p>
<p>Mars</p>
<p>Earth</p>
<p>Venus</p>
<p>Mercury</p>
<p>                                                                                                                                                45</p>
<p>Newton put all of gravities effects together later after Kepler’s Law above. Then Einstein showed the masses outside of the solar system above had some effect on the planet’s orbits. My analogy integrates this information and shows that JLD Unified Field Theory applies to gravity, momentum, magnetism, electron charge fields, why masses moving relative to the rest of the mass in the universe move along a space-time curve that appears to be a straight line that gives centrifugal force.</p>
<p>&#8220;Chemistry&#8221; Addison-Wesley, third edition, copyright 1993, by Wilbraham , Staley, Simpson, Matta, page 247.</p>
<p>&#8220;In contrast, the quantum mechanical model is primarily mathematical. It has few, if any, analogies in the visible world.&#8221; Before the above on page 247 another quote &#8220;The energy level of an electron is the region around the nucleus where it is likely to be moving, the rungs of a ladder are analogists ton the fixed energy levels of the electrons.&#8221; Page 260 of the above book 11 thru 7 the Quantum Concept</p>
<p>&#8220;Planck was trying to quantitatively describe why a body like a chunk of iron appears to change color as it is heated. First it appears black, then red, yellow, white, and blue as its temperature increases. Planck found he could explain this if he assumed that the energy of a body changes only in small discrete units. By analogy, a brick wall can be increased or decreased a size only by units of 1 or more bricks. Planck showed mathematically that the amount of radiant energy, E absorbed or emitted by a body is proportional to the frequency of the radiation. E (symbol proportional to) V or E = hx V</p>
<p>h = 6.6262 (10^-34) J &#8221; J &#8211; a joule of energy.</p>
<p>JLD Analogy of the Ten Dimensions of JLD Analogies of Spiral String aEnergy and aEther in Unified Field Theory of Everything:</p>
<p>First Dimension Line between 2 points</p>
<p>Second Dimension 2 lines between 3 points</p>
<p>Third Dimension 4 lines between 4 points</p>
<p>Fourth Dimension Time</p>
<p>Fifth Dimension Spacetime arc of outward spiral string aEnergy</p>
<p>Sixth Dimension Spacetime arc of inward spiral string aEnergy</p>
<p>Seventh Dimension Combination of Fifth &amp; Sixth Dimensions aEther</p>
<p>Eighth Dimension Electron spiral string aEnergy quantum</p>
<p>Ninth Dimension Proton spiral string aEnergy quantum</p>
<p>Tenth Dimension Neutron, photon and all other spiral string aEnergy quantum&#8217;s</p>
<p>JLD’s Analogies of Science by present day microscopes or transducers let aEnergy and aEther of my #1 Analogy be integrated into &#8220;dark energy&#8221; in quoting from the article &#8220;The Quintessential Universe&#8221; by Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Paul J. Steinhardt in Scientific American, January 2001, page 47. In speaking of the normal mass dark mass and dark energy that makes up the universe quoting from page 49, part of its upper right paragraph &#8220;although the dark energy represents a huge amount of mass, it is spread so thinly that its energy is less than four electron volts per cubic millimeter &#8211; which, to a particle physicist, is unimaginably low. The weakest known force is nature involves an energy density 10^50 times greater.&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 46</p>
<p>&#8220;Extrapolating back in time, vacuum energy gets even more paradoxical.&#8221;</p>
<p>#l JLD Analogy along with the other 16 JLD Analogies integrated into the 10 dimensions of the aEnergy string theories making up in the case of #l JLD Analogy aEther and the theory of everything in JLD’s Unified Field Theory accounts for the unimaginably weak force in every cubic millimeter of the finite universe. Like in the above quoted paragraph lets assume that the average dark energy in JLD’s Analogies is 4 electron volts for every cubic millimeter in the finite universe. Assume that even if this dark energy was visible in the aEnergy string of JLD’s Analogies the cross section of this average string would be so small that the microscopes and present day transducers cannot make it visible to our human eyes.</p>
<p>Like in the quoted article above, if the #l JLD Analogy aEnergy (dark energy) was 10^50 times that average dark energy it would be at the energy density that the force of gravity is at in the vicinity of the solar system on an average, lets assume: These spiral strings in #1 JLD Analogy when the inward part of this (dark energy) aEnergy on its way toward the nucleus of its source atom crosses the outward part of another spiral of (aEnergy in this given aEther) of another atom in a mass at some distance with the inverse square of this distances gravity force would be an attractive force that would tend to decrease that distance.</p>
<p>Next assume that when similar spirals at many magnitudes of greater distances nearer to the in spacetime of these spiral strings of aEnergy (dark energy) that is much weaker by this magnitudes of greater radii to nearer to where the outward parts turn to become inward parts of their respective spirals these light parts of aEnergy (dark energy) repels each other causing the universe to expand in this volume of aEther causing galaxies to be in expansion relative to each other.</p>
<p>The next step is to fit the assumptions above into a hypothesis that works in JLD Analogy Theory of Everything in a Unified Field Theorem. On the same page 49 of Scientific American a quote from mid-page &#8220;The universe expands at an accelerating pace. The growing vacuum energy comes at the expense of the gravitational field.&#8221; In #l JLD Analogy expansion out to the spiral outward part of (vacuum energy &#8211; dark energy) aEnergy where the spiral turns into the inward part of the spiral string and this is not at the expense of #l JLD Analogies gravitational field. Next continue the quote next paragraph.</p>
<p>&#8220;The concepts may sound strange, and even Einstein found them hard to swallow. He viewed the static universe, the original motivation for vacuum energy, as an unfortunate error that ought to be dismissed. But the cosmological constant, once introduced, would not fade away. Theorists soon realized that quantum fields possess a finite amount of vacuum energy, a manifestation of quantum fluctuations that conjure up pairs of &#8220;virtual&#8221; particles from scratch. An estimated total vacuum energy produced by all known fields predicts a huge amount &#8211; 120 orders of magnitude more than the energy density in all other matter. That is, though it is hard to picture, the evanescent virtual particles should contribute a positive, constant energy density, which would imply negative pressure. But if this estimate were true, in acceleration of epic proportions would rip apart atoms, stars and galaxies. Clearly the estimate is wrong. One of the major goals of unified theories of gravity has been to figure out why.&#8221;</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-45" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/45/" title="period-in-earth-years.JPG"></a></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/46/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=46&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/4th-image-after-3rd-part-this-blog-section-page-44/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/period-in-earth-years.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">period-in-earth-years.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subsitute For (the bad uploaded image&#8221;Mystery Of Dark Energy by Jim Wilson)</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/subsitute-for-the-bad-uploaded-imagemystery-of-dark-energy-by-jim-wilson/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/subsitute-for-the-bad-uploaded-imagemystery-of-dark-energy-by-jim-wilson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/subsitute-for-the-bad-uploaded-imagemystery-of-dark-energy-by-jim-wilson/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“In what is widely regarded as the most important scientific discovery of 1998, researchers turned their telescopes to measure the rate at which cosmic expansion was deceleratingand instead saw that it was accelerating. They have been gripping the steering wheel very tightly ever since.As deeply mysterious as acceleration is, if you just acceptit without trying [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=41&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">“In what is widely regarded as the most important scientific </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">discovery of 1998, researchers turned their telescopes </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">to measure the rate at which cosmic expansion was decelerating</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">and instead saw that it was accelerating. They have </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">been gripping the steering wheel very tightly ever since.</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">As deeply mysterious as acceleration is, if you just accept</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">it without trying to fathom its cause, it solves all </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">kinds of problems. Before 1998, cosmologists had been </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">troubled by discrepancies in the age, density and clumpiness </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">of the universe. Acceleration made everything click </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">together. It is one of the conceptual keys, along with other </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">high-precision observations and innovative theories,</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">that have unlocked the next level of the big </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">bang theory.</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">The big bang is often described as an event</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">that occurred long ago, a great explosion that </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">created the universe. In actuality, the theory </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">says nothing about the moment of creation,</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">which is a job for quantum physics (or </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">metaphysics). It simply states that as far </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">back as we can extrapolate, the cosmos </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">has been expanding, thinning out and </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">cooling down. The big bang is best </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">thought of not as a singular event but as </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">an on going process, a gradual molding </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">of order out of chaos. The recent observations </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">have given this picture a coherence </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">it never had before.”<span>                                                                                            </span>This quote from Scientific American’2004 issues CD <span> </span>Special Report THE FOUR KEYS TO COSMOLOGY article February 2004 .The concept of Jack L. Doan of a more static but regenerating and degenerating at the end of our present time acceleration. At this time in my Web log I will substitute these quotes for the image Mystery Of Dark Energy by Jim Wilson which I wrongly referenced as being from SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN.(magazine).<span>                                                                         </span><span>                </span>J.L.D October 16 ,2007.                                                   </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">“From the perspective of life on Earth,</font></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">cosmic history started with inflation</span><span style="font-size:8pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">—</span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">a </span></font><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">celestial reboot that wiped out whatever </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">came before and left the cosmos a featureles s</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">place. The universe was without form,</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">and void. Inflation then filled it with an almost </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">completely uniform brew of radiation.</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">The radiation varied from place to place in an</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">utterly random way; mathematically, it was as </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">random as random could be. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">Gradually the universe imposed order on itself. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">The familiar particles of matter, such as electrons and </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">protons, condensed out of the radiation like water </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">droplets in a cloud of steam. Sound waves coursed </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">through the amorphous mix, giving it shape. Matter </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">steadily wrested control of the cosmos away from radiation. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">Several hundred thousand years after inflation, matter </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">declared final victory and cut itself loose from radiation. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">This era and its dramatic coda have now been </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">probed by high-precision observations of the fossil radiation </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">[see “The Cosmic Symphony,” on page 44]. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">Over the ensuing eons, matter organized itself into</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">bodies of increasingly large size: sub galactic scraps, majestic</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">galaxies, galactic clusters, great walls of galaxies.</font></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">The universe we know</span><span style="font-size:8pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">—</span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">a set of distinct bodies separated </span></font><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">by vast expanses of essentially empty space</span><span style="font-size:8pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">—</span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">is a fairly </span></font><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">recent development, cosmologically speaking. This</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">arrangement has now been systematically mapped [see</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">“Reading the Blueprints of Creation,” on page 54]. Starting</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">several billion years ago, matter has been losing control </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">to cosmic acceleration. Evidently the big bang has </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">gotten a second wind, which is good for it but will be bad </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">for us. The ever faster expansion has already arrested the </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">formation of large structures and, if it continues, could </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">rip apart galaxies and even our planet [see “From Slow  down </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">to Speedup,” on page 62].</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">In developing a cohesive and experimentally successful </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">account of cosmic history, cosmologists have settled </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">the disputes that once animated their field, such as the old </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">debates between the big bang theory and the steady state </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">theory and between inflation and its alternatives. Nothing </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">in science is absolutely certain, but researchers now </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">feel that their time is best spent on deeper questions, beginning</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">with the cause of the cosmic acceleration. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">Although the discovery of acceleration was revolutionary,</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">cosmologists’ initial response was fairly conservative.</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">They dusted off an idea of Einstein’s, the so-called </font></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">cosmological constant, which represents a new type of energy</span><span style="font-size:8pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">—</span></font><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">an example of what is more generally known as </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">dark energy. But many physicists are thinking that a revolutionary </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">discovery calls for a revolutionary response. </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">Maybe the law of gravity works differently on gigantic </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">scales than it does on humble, everyday ones [see “Out of</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">the Darkness,” on page 68].</font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">Just as a nuclear missile cannot be fired unless two </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">keys are turned simultaneously, the explosive progress in </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">cosmology has depended on multiple observational and </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">theoretical keys being turned at once. Will the rush of new </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">ideas lead to chaos? Will order reemerge? Must the cosmos </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">be “preposterous,” as one of the authors of this special </font></span><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"><font face="Times New Roman">report once put it? Or will it start to make sense </font></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">again?” </span><span style="font-size:8pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Roman;">—</span><em><span style="font-size:9.5pt;color:#292526;font-family:Sabon-Italic;">George Musser, staff editor</span></em></font><span style="font-size:6pt;color:#292526;font-family:ConduitITC-Medium;"><font face="Times New Roman">NASA/WMAP</font></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-size:6pt;color:#292526;font-family:ConduitITC-Medium;">SCIENCE TEAM</span><span style="font-size:10pt;color:black;font-family:Sabon-Roman;"></span></font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/41/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=41&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/subsitute-for-the-bad-uploaded-imagemystery-of-dark-energy-by-jim-wilson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd image After 3rd Part My Blog</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/3rd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/3rd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/3rd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[37 9-20-2000 The electron cloud in the atoms shells as they rotate about the earth’s axis and taking the path of least resistance are skewed perpendicular in torus shapes that produce a magnetic field parallel to the earth’s axis producing north and south poles a magnetic compass can detect. The formula to be developed and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=40&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/3rdimageafter3rdpart.JPG" title="3rdimageafter3rdpart.JPG"><img width="509" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/3rdimageafter3rdpart.JPG?w=509&#038;h=554" alt="3rdimageafter3rdpart.JPG" height="554" style="width:344px;height:359px;" /></a></p>
<p>37 9-20-2000</p>
<p>The electron cloud in the atoms shells as they rotate about the earth’s axis and taking the path of least resistance are skewed perpendicular in torus shapes that produce a magnetic field parallel to the earth’s axis producing north and south poles a magnetic compass can detect. The formula to be developed and disclosed as the JLD Unified Field Theory is developed comparing #1 JLD Analo.and #4 JLD Analo.the gravity string aEnergy and electrons energy in forming the magnetic field. The counter clockwise spiraling out of aEnergy in #l JLD Analo.due to the rotation clockwise of the earth looking down at the north pole skews the #l JLD Analo.so that at the electron level #4 JLD Analo.aligns the electron cloud particles spiral fields per the right hand rule of magnetic fields. The JLD Unified Field Theory formula comparing aEnergy of #1 JLD Analogy String aEnergy and #4 JLD Analogy String aEnergy compared to electron energy will be developed. The unifying formula of gravity compared with magnetism is to be developed which will be the Unified Field Theory solution that Albert Einstein initiated. First in studying energy start with the quantum theory of radiation. The following quote from &#8220;Introduction of College Physics&#8221; by Rogers D. Rusk Appleton–Century–Crofts, Inc. New York Copyright 1954 page 263 Radiation and Quantum Theory. &#8220;The basic idea on which this theory rests finds application when we discuss the nature of the atom. According to Planck’s Theory, the energy of a quantum is Eq (ergs) = hf [Eq. 17-4]</p>
<p>Where h is a fundamental constant called the Planck constant the value of which equals 6.62 * 10^-27 erg-seconds, and f is the frequency of the radiation. It will be noticed that as the frequency of the radiation is increased, so also is the energy of a quantum of that radiation increase.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quantum Waves</p>
<p>Small 10^-27 meter OD spirals associated with nodes of the atoms #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy radiation outside of its main stream. These small spiral particles, like photons, have their energy level frequency, the most basic infra-red heat energy radiation quantum frequency. These waves don’t proceed on a straight space time curve like photons but on a space time curve like microwaves.</p>
<p>Researching further Discover October 1993, page 98 &#8220;The Ultimate Vanishing&#8221; by Tim Folger &#8220;If Stephen Hawkins is right, and black holes evaporate like snowballs in the sun, then the past is forever severed from the present, the present from the future. For Physicists, that is the stuff of nightmares.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stephen Hawkins and the other physicists in this article are giants on whose shoulders I, not a physicist, can stand on with my further theories that answers their dilemma. As the Australian’s say, No Worry.</p>
<p>&#8220;Susskind, a theoretical physicist at Stanford, and many of his prominent colleagues have lately been pondering the ultimate fate of black holes. Those mysterious, life swallowing chasms in space and time that form, physicists believe, when the core of massive stars implode. In particular, Susskind and his associates, have been considering the very last moments of a black hole’s existence because the death throws of these bizarre non-objects pose an enormous challenge to science. We’ve encountered a major paradox that nobody knows how to reconcile says Susskind.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am working on this paradox with my JLD’s Analogies, my Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory. From Discover 1993, page 101 &#8221; most surprising and counter intuitive discoveries of modern physics – namely, the finding that a vacuum is not empty but is instead a heating sea of pairs of</p>
<p>38</p>
<p>&#8220;virtual&#8221; particles of matter and anti-matter. These particles spontaneously wink into and out of existence, annihilating each other in a display of subtle fireworks too feeble for us to notice. How do these particles arise from nothingness? According to quantum mechanics, no system, not even a vacuum, is utterly bereft of energy. Fluctuating fields of energy pervade the void. Sometimes this energy congeals into a pair of particles. For the briefest of instants, a particle and its anti-matter doppelganger flash into existence, living on energy of the vacuum. Normally these virtual particles don’t stick around for long – they mutually annihilate, transformed once more into energy before anyone even notices their existence, and so repay their debt to the vacuum.</p>
<p>But if there is some external source of energy apart from the vacuum – an electric field or powerful gravitational field – the virtual particles can get enough of an energy boost from the field to survive in the observable universe. They become real particles. In physics, however, there is no such thing as a free lunch. If one system gains energy, another must lose it.&#8221;</p>
<p>From the quote above my #1 Analogy is intuitive, not counter intuitive, on the inward spiral of aEnergy at the center of its respective atom particles are created in its nucleus. In a volume of space time that has a very high density of atoms and #1 Analogies then the phenomenon of black-hole would be present for observation. In lower density volumes mini black holes would not be observable.</p>
<p>Quote continues &#8220;when particle pairs pop out of the vacuum outside a black hole, they can hijack a minute fraction of the hole’s gravitational energy; the virtual particles become real by using energy that had been warping the space around the black hole. With this extra energy, the particles escape sinking immediately back into the restless void. The borrowed energy not only imbues the virtual particles with mass but also gives them a welcome-to-the-real-world kick of momentum: the particles are born on the fly, like bees boiling from a hive, with a random assortment of trajectories. Some of these trajectories point toward the black hole, some away. Usually the black holes capture both particles, and their energy simply returns to the hole. In that case there is no net loss of energy from the black hole but occasionally, Hawking showed, some of these vacuum-spawned particles, born outside the black hole’s point of no return have enough energy and are aimed in the right direction to flee into space, separated from their anti-partners. When these particles escape from the black hole they take with them some of the black hole’s energy. Ever since Einstein’s Theory of Relativity physicists have realized that mass and energy are interchangeable, so that black hole’s energy loss effectively translates into a loss of mass, and the hole shrinks.&#8221;</p>
<p>#1 through #16 and many more JLD Analogies in a subtle and somewhat weaker way than the high density of particles and energy in black holes where the #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy on the inward part of this spiral of each atom involved creates very powerful gravity in this high density aEther and in the analogised end of this inward part of these spirals new particles are created that in the analogy these particles are formed in the nucleus of present and in some case new atoms. The anti-particles are also formed into the neutrons when more than one proton and electron are created. I believe that God (creation intelligent formulator) controls.</p>
<p>Quote from Scientific American October 2000 page 18 &#8220;Astronomy Black Holes&#8221; titled &#8220;The Hole Shebang&#8221; &#8220;Black Holes and Galaxies may be entwined from birth&#8221;. &#8220;One of the great accomplishments</p>
<p>39</p>
<p>of astronomy over the past century has been to explain stars. Despite their amazing variety, stars all go through the same basic life cycle, driven by a few basic processes such as gravitational collapse and nuclear fusion. Now astronomers are on the verge of a similar synthesis for galaxies. From the diffuse ban of light we call the Milky Way to the blinding bright quasars near the edge of known space, galaxies all take shape in much the same way: through mutual interactions and – according to the latest findings – the exertions of super massive black holes.&#8221;</p>
<p>#1 JLD Analogy in forming aEther can exert its effect on galaxies through its weak force gravity. &#8220;According to the latest findings&#8221; above this force in high density fields can collapse energy, and cosmic dust and/or gas, into stars and their collapse into black holes accumulated at the center of the galaxies can per JLD Unified Field Theory also new stars by accumulations of alto ^ alto’s of atoms created through the subtle #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory.</p>
<p>Quote of the (The Hole Shebang) continued second paragraph: &#8220;Black Holes are notoriously destructive, but their creative potential has gradually come to light. Observation of quasars in the 1960&#8242;s and 1970&#8242;s suggested that only a giant hole – a mass of a million or a billion suns – could power them and by the late 1980&#8242;s mammoth holes had taken the credit for all kinds of anomalously luminous galaxies. The pace of discovery has accelerated lately, helped along by the ultra high resolution of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Very Long Baseline Array radial telescope. Stars and interstellar gas clouds near the center of many galaxies are moving abnormally fast whipped up by the gravity of colossal unseen body – most probably a hole, although alternatives both prosaic (dense star clusters) and exotic (neutrino balls) have not been ruled out.&#8221;</p>
<p>High density #1 JLD Analogies that appear as black holes on the inward parts of these aEnergy spirals producing extreme gravity in this concentration of aEther is the &#8220;unseen body&#8221; quoted above though alternative. &#8220;The count of super massive holes is now up to 34, and two remarkable trends have emerged. First, super massive black holes appear, not just in quasars or quasar like galaxies, but in the unostentatious ones too. In fact, the only requirement seems to be an ellipsoidal shape: Either an elliptical galaxy or a bulge in an otherwise flat galaxy, as in our Milky Way. Completely flat galaxies lack large holes. Second, the mass of each hole is roughly proportional to the mass of the ellipsoidal host (as estimated from its brightness). Holes weigh in at 0.15 percent of the mass of their elliptical galaxies or bulges. The Milky Way’s modest hole befits its modest bulge.&#8221;</p>
<p>The above quote takes JLD Theory of Everything nearly to its outer limits. In a galaxy the inward part of all the atoms (#1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy) forming the majority of the galaxy’s aEther in conjunction with the majority of the galaxy’s gravity. At the center of an ellipsoidal shape like that of the galaxy or a bulge in the center of a flatter galaxy the inward spiraling of the aEnergy forms aEther and the gravity at very high density. This is observable as a black hole. The aEnergy on its inward spiral like on its outward spiral in this string #1JLD Analogy takes the path of least resistance of all the #1 JLD Analogies in the galaxies as well as #1 JLD Analogies in the aEther that extends across all galaxies in the finite steady state universe. Quote continued from &#8220;The Hold Shebang&#8221;, page 18, October 2000 Scientific American. &#8220;A third trend has now been discovered by two teams writing in the August 10 Astrophysical Journal Letters: Carl Gephardt and John Kormendy of the University of</p>
<p>40</p>
<p>Texas at Austin, Douglas Richstone of the University of Michigan, and their colleagues; and Laura Ferrarese of the University of California at Los Angeles and David Merritt of Rutgers University. These researchers found that of a black hole is related to the average velocity of stars within its elliptical host, even in areas beyond the hole’s direct influence. In fact within the error bars, the velocity correlation is perfect. It almost has the status of a new law of nature, a kin to Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion. &#8220;I’m surprised it’s as tight as it is,&#8221; Richstone says.</p>
<p>Although the two teams disagree as to the precise formula for this correlation, both analyses imply that black holes are somehow tailor- made for their galaxies. But how? Did the black hole come first and then determine the mass of the ellipsoid, or was it the other way around? Kormendy points out that the stellar velocity depends not just on the mass of a galactic ellipsoid but also on its size: The smaller the ellipsoid the faster its stars move. This extra effect, he argues, is what makes the velocity correlation so much better than the brightness correlation. To have an extra-heavy black hole, a galaxy or bulge must, in addition to being massive, also be unusually small and dense.&#8221;</p>
<p>The correlation from the quote above can be explained relative to #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory forming aEther. The drag of the inward part of this spiral gives its aspect of the gravitational force that accelerates the atoms of the stars in the vicinity of the black hole of gigantic size along these aligned parts of these spirals into what appears to be this black hole. This extremely dense aEther and gravity creates an environment that can tear stars and possibly even molecules apart. Only 0.15 percent of the elliptical galaxies or bulges of flatter galaxies are involved in black holes at any instant. My question, is it possible mass being pulled into a black hole by the inward spiraling aEnergy that manifests itself as gravity at greater than the speed of light around the spiral space-time curve accelerates this mass to a speed greater than the speed of light transforming it into energy by E = Mc^2 equation so as to travel with the aEnergy which eventually all slows down and enters the nucleus of existing or new atoms or escapes the black hole by Hawking’s, &#8220;slow bleeding radiation&#8221;, shrinking the hole. In my research I am integrating information that has been differentiated by others in the above quotes analyzing all the information of these papers by JLD Analogies Spiral String aEnergy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory. I will also do this in the following quote continued. &#8220;In other words, the mass of the hole is determined by whatever fixes the size of the bulge. The size is thought to be set during bulge formation; once gas has condensed into stars, the size is locked in forever. So it seems that neither the hole or the bulge came first; they developed together, limited by the amount of available material and by the gravity of the dark matter that ultimately calls the shots in this universe. The new correlation thus supports theories that quasars are black holes and bulges in the throws of growth. Such episodes, though not always so intense, may be the natural part of the life cycle of most galaxies, triggered by interactions or mergers with other galaxies, the quasar phase overlaps with the appearance of the first stars in the bulge. Some galaxies then acquire a flattened disk such as the one the sun lives in. Other galaxies begin as a disk and later develop a bulge with a black hole.</p>
<p>Richstone, however, worries that this scenario may contradict the available historical evidence, which suggests a gap in time between the onset of quasar activity and that of star formation. Kormendy disagrees but admits that the scenario is still sketchy. Nobody quite knows what created the &#8220;seed&#8221; hole that then grew to massive proportions, how material steered itself into the hole or why the beast</p>
<p>41</p>
<p>decided to stop eating. &#8220;The art of doing science is to try to get the right answer within perfect data,&#8221; he says.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The dark matter that ultimately calls the shots in the universe&#8221;. #1 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory defines &#8220;the gravity of the dark matter&#8221; and the fact the dark matter is matter outside of the hole in the galaxy mainly but even matter in other galaxies in accumulations of infinitely very weak force via The #l JLD Analogy of each atom in the universe that makes up aEther by its spiral string aEnergy Theory of Everything included in Unified Field Theory. This also explains the &#8220;correlation thus supports theories that quasars are black holes and bulges in the throws of growth&#8221;. #1 JLD Analogy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory does a good job with spiral string aEnergy composing aEther in taking the path of least resistance explaining what &#8220;created the &#8220;seed&#8221; hole that then grew to massive proportions, how material steered itself into the hole&#8221; &#8220;&#8221;this is the art of doing science is to try to get the right answer within perfect data&#8221;". Continue the quote of &#8211; &#8220;The Hole Shebang&#8221; &#8211; last paragraph.</p>
<p>&#8220;To improve the data, Hubbel is testing the correlation between black holes and bulges at its weakest points–namely, the heaviest and lightest galaxies. Meanwhile, the Chandra X-ray satellite is probing black holes in galaxies near and far, and ground-based instruments continue to inspect the black hole at the heart of the Milky Way. Over the coming decade new satellites – the Infrared Telescope Facility and the Next Generation Space Telescope– will scrutinize the very earliest galaxies. By then, black holes may have lost their reputation as quintessentially bizarre objects. They are already beginning to seem rather mundane. –George Musser&#8221;</p>
<p>Starting with the last sentence of the above quote first. My JLD Analogy finds that black holes are most revealing that our universe is steady state where here in high density aEther this Analogy is the micro-component of Einstein’s description of gravity in a much more real unified field concept where the inward part of JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy taking the path of least resistance and pico ^ pico magnitude of these atom’s effect of all the mass of the galaxy exert their gravitational weak forces in an infinitely concentrated way around the area of the gigantic hole so as to pull matter of the galaxy into the hole with gravity so powerful in the density of the #1 JLD Analogies of spiral’s string’s of aEnergy making up the extremely high density of aEther in the black hole’s volume that it pulls the matter apart and accelerates the mass in a speed greater than the speed of light transforming the ingested mass into energies so that it travels in the direction that the mass is being accelerated so as to join the aEnergy to its source the end of #1 JLD Analogies individual existing atom’s nucleus or newly created atom’s nuclei. The newly created atoms near the black hole could be part of the quasar associated with the black hole or the end of the aEnergy string spirals could be at any part of the galaxies mass atomic nucluii. Now back to Discover, October 1993, page 106. &#8220;&#8221;it would be a very basic blow to the whole philosophy of science between the future and the past&#8221;"</p>
<p>In 1993 some physicists thought that black holes imploded to remnants which is similar but different than the above. If my analogies are not correct then there would be an end product of remnants of infinite number. Continue quote of Discover page 106 top:</p>
<p>&#8220;These sub microscopic remnants, too, could pop out of the vacuum. The trouble with an infinite</p>
<p>42</p>
<p>number of types of remnants, say remnant critics, is that the probability that they will materialize out of the vacuum also becomes infinite. They would appear everywhere, all the time. &#8220;Basically the universe as we know it would never have come into existence,&#8221; say Strominger, explaining the reasoning of his critics. Instead of creating mostly ordinary elementary particles at early stages of the universe, the universe would have created mostly remnants.&#8221;</p>
<p>In response to these objections, Strominger and others, including Rutger’s physicist Tom Banks, who worked with Susskind in critiquing Hawkings’ attempt to modify quantum mechanics, wrote a second paper, with a more detailed description of remnants, which appeared this past May. Remnants, the paper argues, are in a sense very much like protons, neutrons, and other familiar particles–simple, nondescript objects, remnants all have the same irreducible mass and size, weighing in at about a hundred-thousandth of a gram (an enormous mass for something smaller than an atom). Seen in this light, remnants are no more likely to swarm out of a void than any other particle in the subatomic vestiary. Remnants are so massive, the paper goes on to say, that they would, like the miniature black holes they are, distort space-time. So the researchers have renamed their remnants, calling them cornucopions to suggest the infinitgely long, horn-like shape they believe remnants would have. &#8220;They are like a drain in a sink,&#8221; says Strominger. &#8220;From the outside, the boundary of the drain is just a small circle. But if you look at the volume inside, you’ve got a lot of room.&#8221; Trapped within the unlimited volume of the horn would be all the information about whatever fell into the original black hole.&#8221;</p>
<p>My analogies and theories use one basic symbol of information that integrates and unifies. Therefore, there is no information loss whereas the physicists are dealing with our information explosion and are dissecting all of this information into an infinite number of symbols and frustrated about losing this information in the remnants of black holes. I only quoted parts of Discover October 1993 pages 93 thru 106 article Ultimate Vanishing. I quoted all of Scientific American October 2000 because I agree with 99% of this George Musser article in this The Hole Shebang pages 18 + 20. Now research Instant Physics by Tony Rothman, Ph.D. page 24.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kepler’s Three Laws Of Planetary Motion</p>
<p>l. The planets travel in Ellipses with the sun at one focus. Kepler’s Law #1 All planets orbit the sun in an ellipse, having the sun at one focus.</p>
<p>2. A planet in orbit about the sun sweeps out equal area times. Kepler Law #2 The equal area law says that a planet in orbit around the sun sweeps out equal area in equal times. The planet moves faster near the sun, and so in an given time it travels a greater distance than when it is far from the sun. But near or far the areas swept out in that time are the same.&#8221;</p>
<p>From both masses the sun and the planet, all the #1 JLD Analogies at same space-time intersecting each other on the inward part of their spirals’ strings’ aEnergy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory composing gravity through the aEther with their drag against the outward parts of these same spirals of every atom in both masses. Looking at this aEther of aEnergies spirals’ strings’ space-time a Planera slice through the center of these two masses have an integrated area of this delineated plane contained in its elliptical path of the spiral’s mass around the larger mass so that this area is equal to any other integrated area of any other space-time of the same length in time around this elliptical path. This path delineated also is affected by all masses in the universe inversely times the square of their distance</p>
<p>43</p>
<p>in respect to the relative motion being observed.</p>
<p>My analogies &amp; theories will develop an integration of Isaac Newton who didn’t take into his equations space-time. Kepler, in 1906, Kepler Law’s and Albert Einstein, 3 giants that I can now stand on their shoulders and see that this is possible with #1 JLD Analogy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory.</p>
<p>Why a planet around a star or an electron around the proton and possible neutron in the nucleus of an atom takes an elliptical path rather than a circle even though the paths in some cases are very near circular? This is because of the other #1 JLD Analogies and/or #4 JLD Analogies in the volumetric area of the two or more masses being observed. The true four dimensional path of the mass that is moving relative to others in space-time is elliptical.</p>
<p>Kepler’s Three Laws continued:</p>
<p>&#8221; The square of the product of a planets orbit is proportional to the cube of its average distance from the sun. Kepler’s Law #3 on the vertical&#8221; Log Scale &#8220;axis is shown the cube of the nine planets&#8221; including the asteroid Ceres &#8221; average distance from the sun. On the horizontal axis is shown the square of all the planet’s periods. When one is plotted.&#8221; using the Log Scale on the Y axis so that the Space-Time curve that the cube of the planets distances including the asteroid Ceres points that form coordinates with the square of the times (periods) &#8220;against the other&#8221; a nearly &#8220;straight line results showing that the two quantities are proportional to each other.&#8221; See graph on page 44.</p>
<p>(Distance from the sun)^3 for a planet in our solar system represents the three physical dimensions of the four within that volume. (The period of the revolution of this volume is space-time) ^ 2 represents the motion through space proportional to the area of the circumscribed plane in terms of earth years for different planets.</p>
<p>What is the logic of the correlation of these ingredients of space-time in relativity of motion? Let’s look at the functionality of the components in Einstein’s formula E = mc ^2 in comparing E with gravity in the case we are studying, m the mass of the planet-sun interaction and c ^ 2 (the speed of light squared) in the case we are studying, the development of #1 JLD Analogy Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory aEnergy strings in aEther. Let E be proportional to gravity as mc^2 is proportional to period of elliptical space-time curve in four dimensions which we are studying here in two dimensions the graphs on page 44 and page 47. The graph on page 47 is a ternary graph which I used in inventing glass bonding in Transducer Engineering for Honeywell see my notebook July 2, 1974 —- July 29, 1974 Jack L. Doan 1974 #4 notebook on the back of page 49 &#8220;Low-Melting Inorganic Glasses with High Melt Fluidities Below 400 degrees C.&#8221; by S. S. Flaschen, A. David Pearson, and William R. Northover</p>
<p>The graph that follows on page 44 is similar to Instant Physics From Aristotle To Einstein And Beyond by Tony Rothman, PH.D. page 24 Kepler’s Law #3</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/40/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=40&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/3rd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/3rdimageafter3rdpart.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">3rdimageafter3rdpart.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd image After 3rd Part My Blog</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/2nd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/2nd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/2nd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24 Continue #16 JLD analo, from Page 22 1 Turn Beyond Electron Spherical Shell Nucleus at Center of a Hydrogen Atom this 4 dimensionl diagram could repersent. The next point of Discovery Disclosure is that the Jack L. Doan Analogy Spiral String Energy is that the Energy is moving along this space-time curve of the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=38&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/spiral-inthru-electron-shell.JPG" title="aEnergy Spiral inthru electron shell that I will later explain how 4 dimensional J_Waves form"><img width="532" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/spiral-inthru-electron-shell.JPG?w=532&#038;h=515" alt="aEnergy Spiral inthru electron shell that I will later explain how 4 dimensional J_Waves form" height="515" style="width:505px;height:455px;" /></a></p>
<p>24</p>
<p>Continue #16 JLD analo, from Page 22 1 Turn Beyond Electron Spherical Shell Nucleus at Center of a Hydrogen Atom this 4 dimensionl diagram could repersent.</p>
<p>The next point of Discovery Disclosure is that the Jack L. Doan Analogy Spiral String Energy is that the Energy is moving along this space-time curve of the spiral at approximately 9(10^16)Meters/Second. The value of C^2 in Einstein’s E = MC^2 not E but C^2 so the spiral string energy is moving along the spiral space time spiral path at the speed of C^2 and the next subject is the nodes that are formed in the space time spherical shells formed relative to electrical magnetic waves and/or photons source atoms. Where the inward part of the Jack L. Doan Analogy Spiral String Energy crosses in the neighborhood of the outward part of this spiral is where the Nodes are supporting the passage of waves that are traveling in space time nearly straight space curves at the speed of light C, 3 (10^8) meters / second.</p>
<p>In matter that contains the mass of this space of this source of electromagnetic waves saying the case being discussed the atom and/or atoms that produced the photon and/or photons as a source there are millions of Nodes in the aEther formed by the Jack L. Doan’s #4 Analogy spiral string energies at C^2 speed so that traveling in a nearly straight line space time curve from point source atom and/or atoms traveling passing by these Nodes at the velocity of light. This is how , in this case, there are wave-particle phenomenons at the velocity of light C. In the case of photons and the wave-particle passing through of a transparent atomic structure of glass the Nodes of the aEther are relative to the Nodes of the atoms Jack L. Doan’s #l Analogy of the atoms of the glass and the speed of the wave-particles is set by the index of refraction of this medium. If the photons and their Jack L. Doan’s #4 Analogy spiral string energy traveling relative to other photons from the same source through different thicknesses of this media have their velocities adjusted accordingly so as to conform to the optics of this case. When the wave-particle emerges the velocity C of outer space aEther in this case relative to the nearly straight path by the space time Nodes. These Nodes are also influenced by the gravity part of Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy spiral string energy the inward part of these millions of spirals in this space-time neighborhood and also the similar attraction of Jack L. Doan’s #4 Analogy spiral string energy which there is a change in the density of gravity field of Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy spiral string energy inward part of spirals so as to exert a force by Jack L. Doan’s Unified Field Theory so as to change the velocity in direction toward the center of this density increase.. My theories are different than Einstein’s in definition but end results are similar.</p>
<p>The photon particle in what is assumed to be a stable physical universe has mass that can transmit force on the surface of matter composed of atoms @ valance electron shell level. The photon because of it’s JLD’s #4 Analo.spiral string energy also is wave like. The force that JLD #1 Analo.is a weak force (present day scientific term) a magnitude less than the force of a photon is in its extremity outside of the valance electron shell of the mass of an atom but can be exerted as gravity in the first field of JLD’s mini-fields Unified Fields Theory. The second field is the magnetic field that also can exert a force by JLD’s on matter mass electron shell level as a static magnetic field or as electromagnetic field resulting from electrons flowing through conducting atoms mass so that the JLD #lAnalo.of atomic spiral string energy and JLD ‘s #2 analo. of electron spiral string energy which is both of these cases energy going from higher to lower density in the case of the long conductor the spirals flatten from spiral spherical 4 dimensional shape in the immediate neighborhood of the conductor and similarly into torus shape in the immediate neighborhood of bar magnet.</p>
<p>Third field is that of momentum of mass at a continuous velocity which JLD #1 Analo.spiral string energy creates this force and similarly in the acceleration of mass JLD #1 Analo.</p>
<p>26</p>
<p>The spiral string of energy that has its energy decreased is proportionally to Ar^2 of the spiral and all of these unified fields of the respective JLD Analo.</p>
<p>The inertia of mass of acceleration is like the momentum of mass moving or at rest in that the JLD #1 Analo.has to have the energies mentioned in its string spirals motion changed by the aEther drag to increase or decrease by the interface of moving masses relative to a different motion of other matters mass motion. The similarity of present scientific equations and aEther drag constant and the force of gravity magnetism and the electrical strikes compared to the weak force of gravity and the photon will be compared and studied in developing these analogies and theories, postulates and hypotheses.</p>
<p>The JLD #2 Analo. energy excess flows through the conductors mass flattening the four dimensional spiral to nearly a two dimensional plus time dimension spiral causing the JLD#1 Analo.to also realign so as on the inward part of that spiral to attract the outward part of the spiral of #2 Analo.to attract each other. These spirals once reorientated in the mass #1 JLD Analo.on some matter masses will stay orientated in this configuration even after the excess JLD #2 is not moving in the neighborhood.</p>
<p>8-8-2000</p>
<p>Bought another book &#8220;The Relativity Explosion&#8221; by Martin Gardner, a completely revised updated edition of relativity for the million published by Vintage v104 1976 original start was in 1962. I also bought another book, &#8220;The Universe and Dr. Einstein&#8221; by Lincoln Barnett published by Time, Inc. I glanced at chapter 7 and read chapter 8 of The Relativity Explosion book. Chapter 8 is thoughts that form a good background for JLD #1 Analo.and the reason in the chapters end to compare with JLD #2 Analo. I read chapter 5 of The Universe and Dr. Einstein. The thoughts in this chapter is like those that gave me the concept of my analogies, especially JLD #1 Analo.and my concept of ether, my theory of everything including my Unified Field Theory.</p>
<p>In my experience I have spent days of time, not all in one stretch, but many times 24 hours looking through the telescope t of Michelson-Morley Interferometer on page 33 in this chapter 5. I understand why they didn’t detect the Ether of their concept. The Ether formed by my JLD #1 Analo.(Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy Spiral String Energy) explains why they couldn’t detect their concept and why I can my concept.</p>
<p>Read up through Chapter 3 &#8220;The Universe and Dr. Einstein&#8221; and it agrees with my analogies. Read Chapter 4 and it points out where my analogies go beyond. Read Chapter 6 to start with Einstein didn’t have to reject the entire concept of the Ether theory, just the &#8220;whole idea of space as a field system or framework.&#8221; I wrote in the margin of this book at the start of Chapter 6, page 35 &#8220;Michelson-Morley experiment was that the velocity of light is unaffected by the motion of the earth.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wrote in the area of the experiment &#8211; this is not necessarily true for the solar system moving in the milky way galaxy or the this galaxy moving amongst other galaxies that are not traveling in the same relative motion . And now reading the end of Chapter 6 I see that in my analogies, theory of everything including my Unified Field Theories the Lorentz Transformation in respect to JLD #1 Analo.&amp; #4 must be studied and compared to the math logic of how my explanation of how the throwing out Ether consideration and the necessity of Lorentz Transformation in order to explain the</p>
<p>27</p>
<p>phenomenon and how my analogies, theory of everything including Unified Field Theory of gravity and photon wave particles explanation explains how the Lorentz math works in relation to my analogies and theories.</p>
<p>X’ = (x-vt) / (1-(v^2 / t^2)) ^-2 Y’ = Y Z’ = Z t’ = (t-vt) / (1-(t^2 / c^2)) ^-2</p>
<p>Read Chapter 7, more of the same like the formulas above for me to reconcile. Reading Chapter 8,</p>
<p>M = mo / (1-v^2 / c^2) ^-2 Needs to be studied</p>
<p>The terms I have used in my analogies, thanks to Dr. Einstein, E = Mc^2 I also, before reading Chapter 7, used the terms M = E / c^2 like on page 53 of &#8220;The universe And Dr. Einstein&#8221;.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 9 next. It describes four dimensional space &#8211; time continuum which I need to reconcile with my Analogies, theory of everything including my Unified Field Theory.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 10 that introduces general theory of relativity. My concept of inertia, which started all my analogies of science, hasn’t been discussed yet in my JLD Analo. The JLD #1 Analogy Spiral String Energy gives mass inertia in the acceleration of aEnergy in the energy string path as the mass sets up motion, because of forces exerted on JLD #1 Analo.and it’s reaction to all the other JLD#1 Analo.in an nearly infinite numbers too large to be computed which by their gravity attractions as a different function of the spiral string aEnergy paths. How aEnergy have the equally mass equality of mass resistance to this acceleration or de-acceleration.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 11, The Laws of Gravity that Einstein formulated behave as a field similar to my concept of aEther in my #1 Analogy and #4 JLD Analo.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 12. The effects of gravity are discussed. My analogy explains the bending of light now the effect of gravity on the emission of photons wave light spectrum shift is to be studied.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 13 and the starting point describing the analogy JLD #1 through JLD #15 Analo., theory of everything including Unified Field Theory. The author, Lincoln Barnett, page 86 &#8220;space, though finite, is unbounded; a mathematician would describe its geometrical character as the four-dimensional analogue of the surface of a sphere.&#8221; One (1-^-30) gram / cm^3 density of matter in this analogue with a 2.1 (10^23) mile radius a distance it takes light to travel in 35 billion light years. &#8220;A sunbeam starting out through space at the rate of 186,000 miles a second would, in this universe, describe a great cosmic circle and return to its source after a little more than 200 billion terrestrial years.&#8221; At the end of Chapter 13 on page 87 of &#8220;The Universe and Dr. Einstein.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read Chapter 14. This discussion that goes beyond Einstein into the concept of but not characterized literally by the author into the Big Bang and the decaying or possibly pulsating universe. In my analogies #1 through #15 &amp; my theory of everything including my Unified Field Theory, the initial start was in my concept like in all my analogies the overall shape of the universe is a four-dimensional spiral.</p>
<p>28</p>
<p>Read the final chapter, Chapter 15, where the emphasis on the unified field theory the author, Lincoln Barnett, &#8220;the analogy is not quite exact, however, for if we conceive of the universe as a kind of spotted balloon&#8221;</p>
<p>My analogies, JLD#1 through #15, my theory of everything including Unified Field Theory will possibly fulfill some of the sought after explanation that this book in Chapter 15 eludes to.</p>
<p>08-10-00</p>
<p>Next the appendix of &#8220;The Universe and Dr. Einstein&#8221;, page 110 &#8220;The exposition of the principle of the increase of inertial mass on pages 51-53 follows a quickly comprehended pattern analogous to those employed by many college physics texts.&#8221; In another quote 2 paragraphs down &#8220;In accordance with the theory of relativity the kinetic energy of a material point of mass m is no longer given by the well-known expression M(v^2) / 2 But by the expression (Mc^2) / (1-(v^2) / (c^2)) ^-2</p>
<p>&#8220;By means of a comparative simple considerations we are led to draw the following conclusion: A body moving with the velocity v, which absorbs an amount of energy E0 in the form of radiation without suffering an alteration in velocity in th process, has, as a consequence, its energy increased by an amount E0 / (1 &#8211; (v^2) / c^2) ^-2</p>
<p>&#8220;Thus the body has the same energy as a body of mass (m + E0 / c^2) moving with the velocity v. Hence we can say: If a body takes up an amount of energy E0, then its inertial mass increases by an amount E0 / c^2; the inertial mass of a body is not a constant,but varies according to the change in the energy of the body. He inertial mass of a system of bodies can even be regarded as a measure of its energy. The law of the conservation of the mass of a system becomes identical with the law of conservation of energy&#8230;.&#8221; &#8220;</p>
<p>In another book reading chapter 5 of the &#8220;Relativity Explosion&#8221; page 77 &#8220;The General Theory of Relativity&#8221; the quote &#8220;gravity and inertia are two different words for exactly the same thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>In my Jack L. Doan Analogy Spiral String aEnergy theory &amp; my theory of everything including Unified Field Theory JLD #1 Analo.is the same for gravity and inertia. Just two different aspects of this Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy spiral string aEnergy. The quote above is the same almost as on page 84 of Chapter 5.</p>
<p>This string of aEnergy that moves along the outward part of Jack L. Doan Analogy from higher density to lower density spiraling via. Coriolis force clockwise in the north side of the matter making up mass until outside valance electrons shell level looking outward at a speed greater than the speed of light can be accelerated and made to move at even greater speed in its gravity and/or inertia functions as the inward part of the other JLD #1 Analo.’s come through the same micro-macro neighborhoods on these inward part of aEnergy strings on their way to their respective sources to go to the even lower density void at the atom center of their nuclear neutrons where the void was created by the outward spiraling energy string. Conversely, the higher than the speed of light Jack L. Doan #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy is de-accelerated by the greater than the speed of light as the intensity of the inward part of JLD #1 Analo.’s as their demand to fill the void is lessened or the void becomes smaller. Both gravity and inertia functions are involved. Infrared electromagnetic radiation from the Jack L. Doan analogies</p>
<p>29</p>
<p>in the transmission of heat energy on a straighter space/time curve at the speed of light to move this energy from higher density to lower density and also photons JLD #4 Analo.’s in this same manner with their aEnergy spirals carrying quantum’s of energy in their moving spirals that are also wave-like. The temperature of JLD #1 Analo.’s decrease to -270 degrees c and degrees kelvin where the neutron is stable.</p>
<p>08-11-00</p>
<p>Read the &#8220;Relativity Explosion Book&#8221; Chapter 6, &#8220;Gravity and Space-time&#8221;. Reading Chapter 6 of this book I see Einstein from his mathematical perspective with the popular explanation of his gravity theory. Quote on page 102 &#8220;A grapefruit placed on this sheet (rubber) will make a depression. A marble placed near the grapefruit will roll toward it. The grapefruit is not &#8220;pulling the marble&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
<p>So that a marble would roll toward it as it was by its inertia trying to follow as straight a line possible can also be better explained by my JLD #1 Analo.’s of many atoms in the mass making up the mass of the grapefruit forming a density of inward part of these (impossible to number) JLD Analo.’s taking a path of least resistance for the marbles JLD #1 Analo.’s to move in that same direction towards the grapefruit as the inertia of the marble JLD #1 Analo.’s trended to keep the marble moving in a straight line. This analogue satisfied Einstein’s concept as quoted on page 102 &#8220;The Relativity Explosion&#8221;, Chapter 5, Gravity and Space-time: (a grapefruit placed on this sheet will make a depression. A marble placed near the grapefruit will roll toward it. The grapefruit it not pulling the marble.&#8221;</p>
<p>Page 106 of Chapter 5 The Relativity Explosion quote:</p>
<p>&#8221; Although relativity theory replaces gravity by a geometrical warping of space-time, it leaves many basic questions unanswered Does this warping take place instantaneously through space or does it propagate like a wave motion.&#8221;</p>
<p>At this time in my development of Jack L. Doan’s Analogies, Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory, I say the answer to the above question is neither instantaneously or as a wave at the speed of light , but at a speed greater than the speed of light.</p>
<p>The Jack L. Doan #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy moves through its space-time spiral path at a speed greater than the speed of light but another question is the electro magnet radiation at the speed of light follows a straighter space time curve along the radius of the source of the spiral’s atom. This shorter distance in 4 dimensions than the 4 dimensional space-time distance along the spiral where the aEnergy String is moving relative to say a photon so in its inertial &#8211; gravity function is the String aEnergy accelerated to a speed greater than the already than the speed of light squared (c^2) speed the aEnergy is at.</p>
<p>&#8221; Almost all physicist agree that the warping moves like a wave and the waves travel with the speed of light. There is also good reason to believe that gravity waves consist of tiny indivisible particles of energy called &#8220;gravitons.&#8221; &#8220;</p>
<p>In my JLD #1 Analo.’s the Spiral String aEnergies are these tiny particles energy that could be called &#8220;gravitons&#8221; but they are not standard electro &#8211; magnetic radiated waves. My Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory will deal with this in later computations. Also see the end of Chapter 5 page 107 at the end.</p>
<p>30</p>
<p>&#8221; Einstein and others have tried to develop a &#8220;unified field theory&#8221;that will unite gravity and electromagnetism in one set of mathematical equations. The results have been disappointing. Perhaps some young reader of these words, if he has the creative genius of an Einstein, will someday see how to formulate such a theory.&#8221;</p>
<p>If such a reader man, woman, girl or boy as above should read my Analogies and developing theories and would like to discuss them with me in that persons math formulations I would greatly appreciate this.</p>
<p>The Relativity Explosion chapter 7 Test of General Relativity</p>
<p>The test in this chapter will be studied and compared with My Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy and #4 Analogy and other electromagnetic radiation with my Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory.</p>
<p>Chapter 8 Mach’s Principal page 121</p>
<p>&#8221; From Mach’s point of view, a cosmos without stars would have no space-time structure relative to which the earth could spin. For there to be gravitational (or inertial) fields capable of bulging a planets equator and spilling water over the sides of a rotating bucket, there must be stars to create a space-time structure. Without such a structure, space-time would possess no geodesics.&#8221;</p>
<p>My (Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy &amp; Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory) agrees with Mach’s point of view in the above quote. Each atom in the universes matter has a JLD #1 Analo. At least one spiral string of aEnergy that though it gets to an infinitely, out at the stars in far away galaxies, they are infinitely (too large to compute) number of them so that their weaker than (weak force) accumulation would be a significant force where you applied it back at the mass of the infinitely small piece of matter that this gravity-inertia function is being applied to in conversely all the JLD #1 Analo.’s weaker than (weak force) in this aEther space-time geodesics structure.</p>
<p>I believe Einstein’s theories of relativity are a great mathematical representative theory of space-time tenors that even a non-mathematical proficient person like myself can understand but the real substance this math is dealing with is like Mach’s point of view in the quote above and like my statement after it about my J. L. Doan’s #1 Analogy Spiral String Energy.</p>
<p>Here I quote from the paragraph before the above quote of Mach’s point of view. &#8220;Mach anticipated much of relativity theory, and Einstein has written about the extent to which Mach inspired his early thinking. (Sad to relate, Mach in his old age, after his insights had been incorporated by Einstein into a successful theory, refused to accept relativity.)&#8221;</p>
<p>All of us stand on the shoulders of giants. Einstein was supported like that by Mach. I am supported like that by Einstein and Mach.</p>
<p>Einstein tried to use Mach’s principle in his mathematical description of his model of this in 1917. Page 123 &#8220;There can be no inertia relative to ‘space,’ but only an inertia of masses relative to one</p>
<p>31</p>
<p>another. If, therefore, I have a mass at a sufficient distance from all other masses in the universe, its inertia must fall to zero.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I stated above, my Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy would at an infinite space-time curve distance let inertia only approach zero. Maybe that is why Einstein’s math theory of Mach’s Principle where &#8220;later, serious flaws were discovered in Einstein’s cosmic model and he was forced to abandon Mach’s Principle, but the principle continues to exert a strong fascination over today’s cosmologists. It is not difficult to see why. It carries the relativity of motion to its ultimate. The opposing point of view, the view that assumes a space-time metric even in the absence of stars, is really very close to the old ether theory. Instead of a motionless, invisible jelly called the ether, there is a motionless invisible space-time structure.&#8221;</p>
<p>This above quote has all the ingredients of Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy in that the mathematical flaws which I don’t fully understand led Einstein from Mach’s Principle. The aEther I conceived is different from old ether in that mine is not relatively stationary but moving throughout the universe only tied to the atom of its source. They all then fit either Einstein’s theory of relativity to a large extent and/or Mach’s Principle.</p>
<p>Next paragraph page 123 &#8220;Dennis Sciama, a British cosmologist, has developed an ingenious theory along Machian lines. He gives an entertaining account of it in his popularly written book The Unity of the Universe. According to Sciama, inertial effects due to rotation or acceleration are the result of a relative motion with respect to the total matter in the universe. If this is true, then a measurement of inertia provides a method for estimating the amount of matter in the universe! Sciama’s equations show that the influence of nearby stars on inertia is astonishingly small. All the stars in our galaxy, he believes, contribute only about one ten-millionth of the strength of inertia on the earth. Most of its strength is contributed by distant galaxies Sciama estimates that 80 percent of inertial force is the result of motion relative to galaxies so distant that they have not yet been discovered by our telescopes!&#8221;</p>
<p>I have not read &#8220;The Unity of the Universe&#8221;. And I don’t know the ingredients of Sciama’s math. Maybe our telescopes today can see a few more of the galaxies that make up the 80 percent he refers to in his quote above. He is on the right track in the quotes ingredients relative to Jack L. Doan’s #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy &amp; Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory except I don’t know if his math will be anything like the math that will be developed in my analogies and theories. The end of chapter 8, the Mach’s Principle, fits what I am doing.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 9 continuing in &#8220;The Relativity Explosion&#8221; about the twin paradox. I have Bertland Russell’s book &#8220;The ABC’s of Relativity&#8221; of which I have read about one-half of. Chapter 9, &#8220;The Twin Paradox&#8221;, page 127 mentions in its first paragraph I will read more of it later. I have, 40 years ago, accepted the fact that time could be different in different inertial-gravity relative movements of clocks including atomic and biological.</p>
<p>Read Chapter 10, 11 &amp; 12. The concept of black holes will be studied later, like on page 173, &#8220;They</p>
<p>32</p>
<p>would compress him on all sides and pull him lengthwise in a fine filament that would approach zero thickness as he fell.&#8221; Page 184, chapter 12, &#8220;The remarkable thing about this microwave radiation is its &#8220;isotropy&#8221;- that is, its uniformity in all spatial directions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Could it be relative to the Jack L. Doan Analogies #1 thru #15or maybe #16 Spiral aEnergy theory of everything including Unified Field Theory. This JLD #16 analo.’s that the big bangers think was from then is really from none as spiral energy radiates yet another wave particle.</p>
<p>Made another spiral drawing on AutoCAD 11 of the very small dimensions which I haven’t been able to reconstruct yet. See below.</p>
<p>8-15-2000 @12:30 a.m.</p>
<p>Today I got more insight into JLD Analogies #1-#15 Spiral String aEnergy JLD Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory. The hydrogen, JLD #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy is the simplest to delineate with one spiral string of aEnergy coming out of the nucleus from neutrons starting point to proton then to the one electron shell where it is relative to this atomic #1 and the atoms low mass. This spiral string after this interface proceeds out beyond the outer radius at 10,000 times larger than the 10^-14 diameter for hydrogen. For gold there would be more spiral strings of aEnergy according to its atomic number and greater mass with 10^-14 meters radius and 10,000 times that for the larger radius for gold. The difference in the inertia of the light hydrogen atom in mass plus atomic number factor and gold that is much heavier proportionally. I will state my computation on this later.</p>
<p>If the extra dimensions like in Scientific American, August 2000, page 65 (that I could consider for JLD Unified Field Theory the 4<sup>th</sup> dimension time) quote &#8220;conversely, for a given number of extra dimensions we can compute how large they must be to make gravity strong near 10^-19 meters. If there is only one extra dimension, its radius must be roughly the distance between the earth and the sun. Therefore, this case is already excluded by observation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don’t think it is excluded by observation in JLD #1 Analogy Spiral &#8220;superstring&#8221; aEnergy that would include the dimension of time that coincides with the three-dimensional spiral path that has a circle shell radius of approximately like a drawing below has 1.49637 E+07km radius. Therefore, the JLD Unified Field Theory &#8220;The ultimate unification of gravity with other forces would then take place near 10^-19 meters rather than 10^-35 meters as traditionally assumed.&#8221; Check TC atom spiral 001 hemisphere distance of sphere R=0.00012006731 millimeters. Check 1.206731 (10^-7) meters. 10^-19 meters is inside of R of sphere. Now considering delineation of 2 spirals of different sizes 2.3992 E + 08km with the radius of the sun sphere approximately 1.496371 E + 07 inside that spherical shell also 1.206731 (10^-7) m which has the 1 (10^-19) unifying shell level inside it. So these delineations of #1 JLD analogy spiral (superstring) aEnergy in the 4 dimensions including time coinciding is my simplified concept instead of Scientific American’s, bottom of page 65, delineation yellow circle small extra dimension in circumference of a tube and the upper right hand part, same page, delineation larger extra dimension of a sphere on a three dimensional sphere with description of gravity as the extra dimension in trying to come up with unification.&#8221;</p>
<p>33</p>
<p>Now, with my old and new information I will go back over it from the start. To understand magnetism and electricity I first formed my first concept of magnetism. The concept of this field was that the energy and the outer shell of the atoms of the magnetized material created the fields lines of magnetic force. Likewise the field of the electrons flow through a conductor of electricity caused the outer shells of this conducting material’s atoms higher levels of energy to cause similar lines of force also magnetic to line up around these atoms in a clockwise direction around the axis of the flow away from one atom to the next. The Unified Field concept of inertia and gravity along with magnetism due to electron possibility of infinite cells around atoms. The integrated concept of electron integer make up not withstanding.</p>
<p>Next, about 48 years ago the concept of energy spirals developed and is still being developed starting years ago like I found today on page 77 (this notebook start 7/25/2000 Jack L. Doan’s Unified Field Theory &amp; Analogies blue Pen-Tab 70) the Japanese concept of hydrogen (T-16). The ordinary hydrogen doesn’t have a neutron like page 80 (this notebook), just a proton spiral of matter around an energy core zone diameter of 1*10^-16 cm dia. The mass of the proton is 1,840 * the mass of an electron. The charge of electron &#8211; is the same in absolute value as the proton plus to be stable the proton of hydrogen doesn’t create a neutron because it isn’t needed to neutralize a second proton in the nucleus area. The aEnergy spirals out from the core through the proton and to the electron in their shells, only one for hydrogen and on into the outer shells in the spiral strings like on page 64 of this notebook. These strings in the outer shells of this atom them return in this spiral path of least resistance return to restore the core on the inward spiral with energy to replace the outward spiral aEnergy.</p>
<p>08-25-00</p>
<p>The aEnergy that comes into the core of an atom like hydrogen page 77 (this notebook) like in the initial Big Bang is energy of high density without form until it in taking the path of least resistance spirals out through the positron layer to the meson layer and if ordinary hydrogen with no neutron can in its clockwise spiral in the northern hemisphere of this matter to take the path of least resistance at the outer boundary of this nucleus spiral out to the electron shell layer where it stays in an energy quantum layer and electron cloud as a short string of aEnergy until the shell level of this inner #1 shell is so dense that it goes to a greater integral level or shell or spirals outward and takes the path of least resistance through outward radial shells as the string spins along its spiral analogies to connect to the proceeding spiral string analogist to the spinning of fibers of cotton on a spinning wheel to form the string of aEnergy that proceeds outward in finding its path of least resistance accelerated by the condition of the string until it reaches its outward limit of the universe where it is no longer part of aEnergy string and tends to re-string inward part of the spiral. The aEnergy may not have a smooth trip in taking the path of least resistance above. On the way in taking the path of least resistance the aEnergy string could go into quark particles configurations up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top (see page 72 and 77 of this notebook) coming out of 5<sup>th</sup> layer the core into the 4<sup>th</sup> layer where spiraling starts. Through the 3<sup>rd</sup> layer of the proton the mass layer spiraling out through spherical meson area the last area on the strings of aEther becoming involved in quark configuration the meson is combination of two quarks and an apion. The atoms other than ordinary hydrogen and neutron that is</p>
<p>34</p>
<p>made up of a proton and an electron which a neutron decays into. The proton is made up of 2 up-quarks and 2 down-quarks. There are many combinations of quarks and sometimes anti-quarks in mesons’ bound atoms. The next group of configurations are the leptons (see page 72 of this notebook).</p>
<p>I made a new drawing on TurboCad v6 spiral drawing layer #16 JLD Analo a delineation of above is created.</p>
<p>08-30-2000</p>
<p>Jack L Doan’s #1 &#8211; #16 Analogies, Theory of Everything including Unified Field Theory the spiral string aEnergy’s quantum accumulation of inward part of spiral of aEnergy into atom nucleus proton and hydrogen regular and protons with neutrons and all other atoms integer nature of electron &amp; higher level electron shells an integer proton release from these shells is due to the particles in the nucleus forming an integer quantities of aEnergy to replace quantities of aEnergy in integer groupings as the aEnergy moves to fill the lower energy due to the units left as aEnergy moves from high density to lower density and taking the path of least resistance.</p>
<p>09-01-2000</p>
<p>At this point the aEther of aEnergy spiraling out beyond the electron’s shell the red dot at the center of the spiral (page 101 of this notebook) that is around the small, very small, nucleus of this hydrogen atom. Go back into electron shell sphere, the small red dot in the center, and work on #17 JLD Analo of the mechanism of electron flow from one atom to another. The high density of electron energy cloud of charges in the electron shell of aEnergy and quantum’s required to balance the protons charge as electron aEnergy spirals from one atom to another #17 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy has a strong but less far reaching effect in aEther. aEther will be discounted except at the last of this paragraph as this JLD Analo is developed. The strong fields set up by the moving quantities of aEnergy called electron flow amperage. Similar to #l J. L. Doan Analogy Spiral String aEnergy and forming aEther by #16 J LD Analo the energy in moving from high density to lower density and the dense sphere shell of electron charges spiral clockwise in the direction of flow. Unlike the energy quantity that was required for #16 JLD Analo in #17 JLD Analo is a strong local area field perpendicular plane to the direction flow of electron energy. As the electron energy moves from one atom to another the electron energy flows as the density in the atoms electron energy shell becomes denser many millions of these planer spirals of the magnetic field are created by moving electron energy from these sources of aEnergy in this new form of magnetic fields that combine to form a larger local area volumetric field. Now aEther will no longer be discounted as this field spiral decreases in their magnetic strength by the inverse of distance squared until the aEnergy is absorbed into the aEther of #1 JLD Analog’s of the local volume atoms source in local matter in a very small amount but by the aEther from atom sources far away by a direct proportion to the distance squared from the local volume atoms where the magnetic aEnergy was created in this #17 JLD Analogy Spiral String aEnergy that is stronger in the local volume than #1 JLD Analo’s gravity field.</p>
<p>35</p>
<p>The #1 JLD Analo. unified field of gravity, inertia-momentum and other weak force effects of spiral string aEnergy now needs a correlation formula to the strong force #16 &amp; #17 JLD Analo.’s Unified Field of Electron, Proton, Photon-radiation and other strong force formulas. The rotation about an axis in space time is the major non-random three dimensional movement in time that will be studied as the basic starting point of my Unified Field Theory Math. In our physical dimensions the rotation of an armature in a magnetic field produces an AC wave of electrons flowing in the conductor of this armature. Waves are the results of rotating motion of particles. The matter of our earth will be studied first then galaxies and atoms later. First look at the aEther generated by the earth. JLD #1 Analogy Spiral String aEnergy in the area of the earth’s matter where every atom of this matter is rotating about the centerline through the poles of the earth so that the strings aEnergy from atoms on the opposite side of this centerline axis have the strongest effect in the points close to the nucleus of these atoms generating this aEther. As this rotation causes the aEther from the opposite side of the axis drags across the JLD #l Analogy Spiral String aEnergy at the atoms electron shells these strings are skewed so as to produce the basic facets of the gravity &#8211; magnetic unified field theory being disclosed here.</p>
<p>But first, next year, February 9, 2001, a quote from The Arizona Republic Health/Science section.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unexpected result may advance physics Experiment shakes Standard Model theory Republic Wire Services New York — Physicist may have poked a hole in their theory of how the universe operates.</p>
<p>Researchers at the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island reported experiments Thursday that showed a subatomic particle deviating slightly from its expected behavior. That tiny discrepancy could provide support for exotic theories.</p>
<p>&#8220;If it holds up, it’s a very exciting finding that can change how we see the world, how we look at matter and how it interacts, &#8220;said physicist Bradley Keister of the National Science Foundation, one of the agency’s supporting the work.</p>
<p>Much of physics today is based on a theory called the Standard Model. The theory has been able to explain three of the four forces in the universe – the strong and weak forces, which hold an atom together, and the electromagnetic force – but not the fourth one, gravity.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you find an experiment that disagrees with it, then that’s fairly significant,&#8221; said James Miller a physicist at Boston University and a member of the team that conducted the Brookhaven research.</p>
<p>The experiment examined the behavior of muons, heavier relatives of electrons, as they floated in a powerful magnetic field. In a magnetic field, a muon modifies its spin, a subatomic property like the rotation of a toy top. 36a</p>
<p>Earlier experiments have found a spin modification fairly close to that predicted by the Standard Model. But the Brookhaven experiment was several times more precise than previous measurements. It concluded the actual change in the muons’ spin differed from predictions by just a few parts in a million.</p>
<p>That small discrepancy suggests something is lacking in the smaller model, though there is still a chance that further results could bring theory and experiment back into line.</p>
<p>The most likely explanation for the anomalous result is supersymmetry, a theory that goes beyond the standard model. In supersymmetry, every known particle has a much heavier counterpart paired with it. Unlike the Standard Model, the theory has a place for gravity and explains why the various particles have the masses that they do.&#8221;</p>
<p>#16 JLD analo. Continued from Page 24 #1 JLD analo. Spiral Red Starts here at Nucleus</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/38/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=38&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/2nd-image-after-3rd-part-my-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/spiral-inthru-electron-shell.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aEnergy Spiral inthru electron shell that I will later explain how 4 dimensional J_Waves form</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>eSpiralAfter3rdPartMyBlog</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/espiralafter3rdpartmyblog/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/espiralafter3rdpartmyblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/espiralafter3rdpartmyblog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=35&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/espiralafter3rdpartjpg.JPG" title="eSpiralAfter3rdPartJPG"><img width="369" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/espiralafter3rdpartjpg.JPG?w=369&#038;h=360" alt="eSpiralAfter3rdPartJPG" height="360" /></a></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/35/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=35&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/espiralafter3rdpartmyblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/espiralafter3rdpartjpg.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">eSpiralAfter3rdPartJPG</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>After 3rd Part My Blog</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/after-3rd-part-my-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/after-3rd-part-my-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/after-3rd-part-my-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next the Energy in Jack L. Doan’s #1Analogy Spiral String Energy (here after in this part of my 23 Papers will be annotated JLD#1Analo. Is similar to that of Fresnel’s Drag in that the velocity of the string energy is accelerated along its spiral space curve path relative to the JLD#1Analo. In relation to other [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=20&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next the Energy in Jack L. Doan’s #1Analogy Spiral String Energy (here after in this part of my 23 Papers will be annotated JLD#1Analo. Is similar to that of Fresnel’s Drag in that the velocity of the string energy is accelerated along its spiral space curve path relative to the JLD#1Analo. In relation to other mass that isn’t moving relative to it. The finite thinness of the string and the force it takes to accelerate it is in the magnitude of the square-root of that of a photon on a similar quantum basses.</p>
<p>                                                                     <a rel="attachment wp-att-33" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/after-3rd-part-my-blog/aenergyespiral/" title="aEnergyeSpiral">aEnergyeSpiral</a></p>
<p>For JLD#1 through #15Analo.’s &amp; Theory of Everything including JLD’s Unified Field Theory I now disclose postulates and hypothesis:</p>
<p>Postulate #1 Everything was not created for all time in the big bang a concept as it is presented by present day science.</p>
<p>Postulate #2 The Energy in JLD’s Analo.’ies were transformed into the physical universes mass in matter and different energies from some of the Energy in JLD’s Analo. Spiral string energy before the 4 dimensional spiral was formed in a high density energy expansion in space-time which in our physical world would appear to be a big bang. The centers of galaxies can start these JLD’s Analo. At the present time in those areas high density of energy that forms strings of energy in a spiral.</p>
<p>Basis of JLD’s theory of everything including JLD’s Unified Field Theory.</p>
<p>Hypothesis:</p>
<p>The extremely high density of energy before the areas at the center of mass like galaxies and after cause:</p>
<p>The energy to form string energy from moving from high density to less density away from the center of extremely high density source formed first before galaxies from this energy only and after large matters mass center like in galaxies from returning strings of this energy. As the strings are formed as it moves from the extremely high density of energy the strings form spirals of these strings of energy first in sub microscopic vortexes that become particles with mass light characteristics like JLD #2 Analo. Through JLD’s Analo’ies through #15 and then as these progress the JLD #1 Analo.’ies are formed in the progression from higher LD #1 Analo. Densities to lower densities of the same with the strings of energy continuously accelerating and forming the spiral at the sub microscopic area initially in the extremely high energy density of strings so as to avoid running into other strings and as strings of the initial particles escape the particles vortex to form larger particles up to atomic size spirals as they progress to lower density JLD’s Analo. Inversely #15 through #1. First moving from #15 through #1 the density of the spiral energy strings increases but then the strings that the energy spiral takes get less dense until it is extremely small except for in the case of JLD #4 Analo. Of the photon particle which stays more constant.</p>
<p>E = MC^2 Comes from the mass</p>
<p>M = E/C^2 Comes from the energy</p>
<p>C^2 is the constant of ratio of JLD’s Analo.spiral string aEnergy that forms aEther plus. The photon JLD #4 Analo.spiral string energy moves inside the sphere of the spiral from the source atom made up of JLD’s Analo.#2, #3 and #5 through #15 in JLD #1 Analo.on the radius of this sphere at the velocity of light C.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/20/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=20&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/after-3rd-part-my-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd part of Analogy to THEORY OF EVERYTHING</title>
		<link>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/3rd-part-of-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/3rd-part-of-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jackbecommspeednet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/3rd-part-of-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a) The light wave through this screen creates a one slit diffraction pattern on the oppiset wall. b) The light wave through this screen creates a two-slit diffraction pattern on the opposite wall.                                                                                                                                                        c) Sending particle-like photons one at a time through two slits results in a two-slit pattern, after enough photons have fallen [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=8&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">a) The light wave through </span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">this screen creates a one slit diffraction pattern on the </span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">oppiset wall.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">b) The light wave through this screen creates a two-slit diffraction</span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"> pattern on the opposite wall.</span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">                         <a title="Part 3 Analogy to Theory of Everything" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/3rd-part-of-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/part-3-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/" rel="attachment wp-att-13"> <img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/image006.gif?w=480" alt="Part 3 Analogy to Theory of Everything" align="left" /></a>                                                                                                                              </span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">c) Sending particle-like photons one at a time through two slits results in a two-slit pattern</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">, after enough photons have fallen on the screen</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"> particle should only be able to go through one slit, but the two-slit pattern indicates</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"> that each photon has somehow gone through both slits, like an extended wave.                        </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">d) This conclusion is confirmed if one or the other slit is shut at random before each photon passes</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">. Then you get 2 one-slit patterns, not a two-slit pattern.</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">This proves that in (c) each photon particle was nevertheless going through two slits.</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">Jack L. Doan’s Unified Field Theorem #4Analogy Spiral String Energy &#8211; Photon Delineation Wave &#8211; Particle Duality                                                                                    </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">E) Photon Jack L. Doan’s #4Analogy </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">passing through two-slits see above </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">delineated also in enlarged view is one of the billions of Jack L. Doan’s #1Analogy 4 dimensional spiral string energies shown partially not extending to infinity as they do with the one delineated near the sharp edge of a slit where it has a strong influence in bending the wave-particle of the photon’s Jack L. Doan’s #4Analology 4 Dimensional spiral energy string shown in 2 dimensions for simplicity and not to scale which deflects toward the mass close to the sharp edge only one shown in the enlarged view but billions of atoms #1Analogy on both sides of both slits are involved in this two-slit diffraction pattern on the photographic plate. The ether of which a very small part is delineated by the dotted spiral with the strong 4 dimensional matrix made up of the energy strings spiraling even outside of the present day scientific measurement of the atoms space radius influence on the photon #4Analogy spiral string energy also comes from the atoms of the photographic plate’s #1Analogy spiral string energy levels not delineated extended to the photon and beyond. The photon particles approach the slits mutually attracted to each other from their relatively point source in a wave (particle-wave) front so as to have the wave type of diffraction relative to the two-slit interface in the ether’s 4 dimensional matrix so that the wave front appears to split as they come relatively close to the sharp edge of the slits. Therefor they are recorded as particles on the photographic plate in the quantities indicated by the 2 dimensional piles shown for simplification. In the case of high velocity photons see the bottom of page 189 and top of page 190 of Instant Physics Diversity and Unity Quote &#8221; High-energy gamma rays (photons) also strikes the atmosphere but for some reason are not referred to as cosmic rays. When one of these &#8220;primary&#8221; particles strikes an air molecule, its extraordinary energy can be converted by E = mc^2 into many &#8220;secondary&#8221; and even &#8220;tertiary&#8221; particles. Anderson’s position was one of these secondary particles. As we shall see , it is in Quantum Mechanics Page 181,</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">&#8220;The wave-particle duality similar man-made collisions that many particles known today were discovered..&#8221; The 2 dimensional spiral shown below: the Fermat’s Spiral would be a better delineation in the respect of having a outward spiraling part and an inward spiraling part. The inward spiraling part of the Jack L. Doan’s #1Analogy spiral string energy path is the part that creates the gravity force in this field of ether from all the other Jack L. Doan’s analogy spiral string energy from all the other atoms in the universe in Jack L. Doan’s &#8220;Theory of Everything&#8221; Unified Field Theorem. Also in Jack L. Doan’s Analogies #2 through #15 there is the similar attractions between like analogies and in some non-similar analogies.</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">Now though the Fermat’s Spiral is shown in 2 dimensions and is used for illustration the Jack L. Doan’s Analogies spiral string energy paths are 4 dimensional.</span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><a title="fermats-spiral.JPG" href="http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/3rd-part-of-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/attachment/18/" rel="attachment wp-att-18"><img src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/fermats-spiral.JPG?w=480" alt="fermats-spiral.JPG" /></a></span></span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><img style="width:617px;height:799px;" src="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/darkenergy.JPG?w=496&#038;h=664" alt="darkenergy.JPG" width="496" height="664" /></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman';">The above uploaded in jpeg format. &#8221; The Mystery Dark Energy &#8220;  Jim Wilson page was coppied above after J_Waves which will be Disclosed later in this Blog.</span></span></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>12/14/2011 The reason that Michelson &amp; Morley experiment failed to detect J_Ether and their Aether was that it is attached to the earth. Each atom of the earth contribute to it so it not only is dragged along with them but their gravitational affect reteaches the moon and beyond. This is the Jack L. Doan Disclosure stated above on this date.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/8/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1784548&amp;post=8&amp;subd=jackbecommspeednet&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jackbecommspeednet.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/3rd-part-of-analogy-to-theory-of-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d8173bf63537e87dc5e4a4a678a5eeaf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jackbecommspeednet</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/image006.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Part 3 Analogy to Theory of Everything</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/fermats-spiral.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fermats-spiral.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://jackbecommspeednet.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/darkenergy.JPG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">darkenergy.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
